Papers by Nishant Subramani
Personal Information Parroting in Language Models (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern language models memorize millions of PI instances, increasing privacy risks. |
| Approach: | They develop a model that parrots 13.6% of PI verbatim on a manually curated set of 483 instances . they recommend that pretraining datasets be aggressively filtered and anonymized to minimize PI parroting. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the best regex-based PI detectors on a manually curated set of 483 instances of PI. |
Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasets (2022.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
Julia Kreutzer, Isaac Caswell, Lisa Wang, Ahsan Wahab, Daan van Esch, Nasanbayar Ulzii-Orshikh, Allahsera Tapo, Nishant Subramani, Artem Sokolov, Claytone Sikasote, Monang Setyawan, Supheakmungkol Sarin, Sokhar Samb, Benoît Sagot, Clara Rivera, Annette Rios, Isabel Papadimitriou, Salomey Osei, Pedro Ortiz Suarez, Iroro Orife, Kelechi Ogueji, Andre Niyongabo Rubungo, Toan Q. Nguyen, Mathias Müller, André Müller, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad, Nanda Muhammad, Ayanda Mnyakeni, Jamshidbek Mirzakhalov, Tapiwanashe Matangira, Colin Leong, Nze Lawson, Sneha Kudugunta, Yacine Jernite, Mathias Jenny, Orhan Firat, Bonaventure F. P. Dossou, Sakhile Dlamini, Nisansa de Silva, Sakine Çabuk Ballı, Stella Biderman, Alessia Battisti, Ahmed Baruwa, Ankur Bapna, Pallavi Baljekar, Israel Abebe Azime, Ayodele Awokoya, Duygu Ataman, Orevaoghene Ahia, Oghenefego Ahia, Sweta Agrawal, Mofetoluwa Adeyemi
| Challenge: | Lower-resource corpora have systematic issues, including mislabeled or nonstandard/ambiguous language codes. |
| Approach: | They manually audit the quality of 205 language-specific corpora released with five major public datasets. |
| Outcome: | The results show that lower-resource corpora have systematic issues even for non-proficient speakers. |
Extracting Latent Steering Vectors from Pretrained Language Models (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior work on controllable text generation has focused on learning how to control language models through trainable decoding, smart-prompt design, or fine-tuning based on a desired objective. |
| Approach: | They propose to extract latent vectors directly from pretrained language model decoders without fine-tuning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach generates a target sentence nearly perfectly for English sentences . it outperforms pooled hidden states of models on a textual similarity benchmark . |
MICE for CATs: Model-Internal Confidence Estimation for Calibrating Agents with Tools (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models that measure confidence in tool-using agents are poorly calibrated. |
| Approach: | They propose a class of model-internal confidence estimators to assess confidence when calling tools. |
| Outcome: | The proposed class beats baselines on a simulated trial and error (STE) tool-calling dataset using Llama3 models. |
Model Internal Sleuthing: Finding Lexical Identity and Inflectional Features in Modern Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior work suggests hierarchical organization where different layers specialize in capturing distinct levels of linguistic structure. |
| Approach: | They probe 25 models from BERT Base to Qwen2.5-7B focusing on linguistic properties: lexical identity and inflectional features. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model maintains inflectional features across layers while trading off lexical identity for compact, predictive representations. |
GEMv2: Multilingual NLG Benchmarking in a Single Line of Code (2022.emnlp-demos)
Copied to clipboard
Sebastian Gehrmann, Abhik Bhattacharjee, Abinaya Mahendiran, Alex Wang, Alexandros Papangelis, Aman Madaan, Angelina Mcmillan-major, Anna Shvets, Ashish Upadhyay, Bernd Bohnet, Bingsheng Yao, Bryan Wilie, Chandra Bhagavatula, Chaobin You, Craig Thomson, Cristina Garbacea, Dakuo Wang, Daniel Deutsch, Deyi Xiong, Di Jin, Dimitra Gkatzia, Dragomir Radev, Elizabeth Clark, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Filip Ginter, Genta Indra Winata, Hendrik Strobelt, Hiroaki Hayashi, Jekaterina Novikova, Jenna Kanerva, Jenny Chim, Jiawei Zhou, Jordan Clive, Joshua Maynez, João Sedoc, Juraj Juraska, Kaustubh Dhole, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, Laura Perez Beltrachini, Leonardo F . R. Ribeiro, Lewis Tunstall, Li Zhang, Mahim Pushkarna, Mathias Creutz, Michael White, Mihir Sanjay Kale, Moussa Kamal Eddine, Nico Daheim, Nishant Subramani, Ondrej Dusek, Paul Pu Liang, Pawan Sasanka Ammanamanchi, Qi Zhu, Ratish Puduppully, Reno Kriz, Rifat Shahriyar, Ronald Cardenas, Saad Mahamood, Salomey Osei, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Sanja Štajner, Sebastien Montella, Shailza Jolly, Simon Mille, Tahmid Hasan, Tianhao Shen, Tosin Adewumi, Vikas Raunak, Vipul Raheja, Vitaly Nikolaev, Vivian Tsai, Yacine Jernite, Ying Xu, Yisi Sang, Yixin Liu, Yufang Hou
| Challenge: | Evaluations in machine learning rarely use the latest metrics, datasets, or human evaluation in favor of remaining compatible with prior work. |
| Approach: | They propose to use the Generation, Evaluation, and Metrics Benchmark to integrate new evaluation methods into existing evaluations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation infrastructure bridges the gap between the advantages of leaderboards and in-depth and evolving evaluations by allowing model developers to benefit from each other's work. |
SimBA: Simplifying Benchmark Analysis Using Performance Matrices Alone (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern language models are evaluated on large benchmarks, which are difficult to make sense of. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to Simplify Benchmark Analysis using model-centric evaluation numbers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can be applied to HELM, MMLU, and BigBenchLite benchmarks. |