Papers by Jianping He

7 papers
MAPS: Motivation-Aware Personalized Search via LLM-Driven Consultation Alignment (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing personalized product search methods assume that users’ query fully captures their real motivation, but in practice, user's queries do not always articulate the requirements.
Approach: They propose a Motivation-Aware Personalized Search method that embeds queries and consultations into a unified semantic space via LLMs and utilizes a Mixture of Attention Experts (MoAE) to prioritize critical semantics.
Outcome: Extensive experiments on real and synthetic data show that the proposed method outperforms existing methods in retrieval and ranking tasks.
Towards Hierarchical Multi-Step Reward Models for Enhanced Reasoning in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing Process Reward Models (PRMs) are vulnerable to reward hacking and require expensive, large-scale annotation of reasoning steps.
Approach: They propose a reward model approach which evaluates both individual and consecutive reasoning steps from fine-grained and coarse-grounded level.
Outcome: Empirical results show that the proposed model performs better than existing PRMs and is more robust than existing models.
QueryLink: Leveraging Query-Memory Alignment for Long-Term Reasoning in LLM Agents (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to integrating external memory prioritize memory organization while overlooking a critical semantic gap between implicit, intent-driven queries and explicit, narrative-based memories.
Approach: They propose a framework that leverages Query-Memory Alignment to project both queries and memories into a shared semantic space.
Outcome: The proposed framework significantly outperforms SOTA methods on the LoCoMo and LongMemEval benchmarks and can be integrated as a plug-and-play component to boost existing vector-based systems like A-MEM.
Instruct-of-Reflection: Enhancing Large Language Models Iterative Reflection Capabilities via Dynamic-Meta Instruction (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches involve models iterating and improving their previous responses based on internal reflection ability or external feedback.
Approach: They propose a reflection framework that leverages meta-thoughts and self-consistency to enhance the iterative reflection capability of Large LanguageModels.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves an average improvement of 10.1% over established baselines in mathematical and commonsense reasoning tasks, highlighting its efficacy and applicability.
The Dark Side of Function Calling: Pathways to Jailbreaking Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have remarkable capabilities, but their security implications have been overlooked.
Approach: They propose a “jailbreak function” attack method that exploits alignment discrepancies, user coercion, and the absence of rigorous safety filters.
Outcome: The proposed attack exploits alignment discrepancies, user coercion, and the absence of rigorous safety filters on six state-of-the-art LLMs.
ORMind: A Cognitive-Inspired End-to-End Reasoning Framework for Operations Research (2025.acl-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising results in various domains, but their practical application in industry-relevant operations research presents significant challenges and opportunities.
Approach: They propose a cognitive-inspired framework that enhances optimization through counterfactual reasoning . they use a workflow that transforms requirements into mathematical models and executable solver code .
Outcome: Experiments show that ORMind outperforms existing methods in the NL4Opt dataset and ComplexOR dataset.
Similarity = Value? Consultation Value-Assessment and Alignment for Personalized Search (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods rely on semantic similarity to align historical consultations with current queries due to the absence of ‘value’ labels, but this lacks exploration of needs in user consultations.
Approach: They propose a consultation value assessment framework that evaluates historical consultations from three novel perspectives: (1) Scenario Scope Value, (2) Posterior Action Value, and (3) Time Decay Value.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms baselines on public and commercial datasets on both retrieval and ranking tasks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations