COIG-P: A High-Quality and Large-Scale Chinese Preference Dataset for Alignment with Human Values (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
Siwei Wu, JinCheng Ren, Xeron Du, Shuyue Guo, Xingwei Qu, Yiming Liang, Jie Liu, Yunwen Li, Tyler Loakman, Tianyu Zheng, Boyu Feng, Huaqing Yuan, Zili Wang, Jiaheng Liu, Wenhao Huang, Chenglin Cai, Haoran Que, Jian Yang, Yuelin Bai, Zekun Moore Wang, Zhouliang Yu, Qunshu Lin, Ding Pan, Yuchen Eleanor Jiang, Tiannan Wang, Wangchunshu Zhou, Shenzhi Wang, Xingyuan Bu, Minghao Liu, Guoyin Wang, Ge Zhang, Chenghua Lin
| Challenge: | Existing Chinese preference datasets suffer from limited scale, restricted domain coverage, and insufficiently rigorous data validation. |
| Approach: | They propose an LLM-based data annotation pipeline with no human intervention to annotate Chinese preference datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline outperforms existing Chinese preference datasets on AlignBench and Chinese Reward Benchmark. |
Similar Papers
COIG-CQIA: Quality is All You Need for Chinese Instruction Fine-tuning (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Yuelin Bai, Xeron Du, Yiming Liang, Leo Jin, Junting Zhou, Ziqiang Liu, Feiteng Fang, Mingshan Chang, Tianyu Zheng, Xincheng Zhang, Nuo Ma, Zekun Moore Wang, Ruibin Yuan, Haihong Wu, Hongquan Lin, Wenhao Huang, Jiajun Zhang, Chenghua Lin, Jie Fu, Min Yang, Shiwen Ni, Ge Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing datasets for Chinese instruction tuning are not well-aligned with Chinese users’ interaction patterns. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Chinese instruction tuning datasets to improve instruction fine-tuning for Chinese users. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that Chinese models achieve competitive performance in diverse benchmarks. |
Cheems: A Practical Guidance for Building and Evaluating Chinese Reward Models from Scratch (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xueru Wen, Jie Lou, Zichao Li, Yaojie Lu, XingYu XingYu, Yuqiu Ji, Guohai Xu, Hongyu Lin, Ben He, Xianpei Han, Le Sun, Debing Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing Chinese resources are small in scale and limited to specific domains, making them insufficient for LLM post-training. |
| Approach: | They propose a Chinese-annotated reward model and a preference dataset to address this gap . they evaluate Chinese RMs on CheemsBench and construct an RM that captures human preferences . |
| Outcome: | The proposed RM achieves state-of-the-art performance on CheemsBench and CheeMePreference. |
AlignBench: Benchmarking Chinese Alignment of Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xiao Liu, Xuanyu Lei, Shengyuan Wang, Yue Huang, Andrew Feng, Bosi Wen, Jiale Cheng, Pei Ke, Yifan Xu, Weng Lam Tam, Xiaohan Zhang, Lichao Sun, Xiaotao Gu, Hongning Wang, Jing Zhang, Minlie Huang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang
| Challenge: | Effective evaluation of alignment for emerging Chinese LLMs is still significantly lacking, calling for real-scenario grounded, open-ended, challenging and automatic evaluations tailored for alignment. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-dimensional benchmark for evaluating LLMs’ alignment in Chinese with 8 main categories, 683 real-scenario rooted queries and corresponding human verified references. |
| Outcome: | The benchmark uses a human-in-the-loop data curation pipeline, 683 real-scenario rooted queries and human verified references. |
CoAct: Co-Active LLM Preference Learning with Human-AI Synergy (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to learn from preference-based feedback are expensive and scarce. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that synergistically combines self-rewarding and active learning through human-AI collaboration. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods on three reasoning benchmarks and achieves average improvements of +13.25% on GSM8K, +8.19% on MATH, and +13.16% on WebInstruct. |
A Grounded Preference Model for LLM Alignment (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Tahira Naseem, Guangxuan Xu, Sarathkrishna Swaminathan, Asaf Yehudai, Subhajit Chaudhury, Radu Florian, Ramón Astudillo, Asim Munawar
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from factual inconsistency and hallucination despite recent advances . training a preference model requires substantial human annotation, which is expensive and labor-intensive. |
| Approach: | They propose to generate synthetic grounded preference data and train a Grounded Preference Model to assess the overall quality of grounded responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate much better grounded responses as judged by GPT4 and achieves the TRUE faithfulness Benchmark. |
FaST: Feature-aware Sampling and Tuning for Personalized Preference Alignment with Limited Data (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have focused on personalizing conversational assistants to meet specific user preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset to analyze a problem where only a small set of preference annotations can be collected per user. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach leverages high-level features discovered from the data, achieving the best overall performance. |
CodeArena: Evaluating and Aligning CodeLLMs on Human Preference (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jian Yang, Jiaxi Yang, Wei Zhang, Jin Ke, Yibo Miao, Lei Zhang, Liqun Yang, Zeyu Cui, Yichang Zhang, Zhoujun Li, Binyuan Hui, Junyang Lin
| Challenge: | Code large language models (codeLLMs) focus on synthesizing the correct code snippet, ignoring the alignment with human preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark code-based on 40 categories and 44 programming languages to emulate real-world coding tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that open-source code LLMs perform better than open-sourced ones. |
Dissecting Human and LLM Preferences (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that human and Large Language Model preferences are important for model fine-tuning and evaluation. |
| Approach: | They dissect the preferences of human and 32 different Large Language Models to understand their quantitative composition. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is compared with 32 different large language models using real-world user-model conversations. |
A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Joongwon Kim, Anirudh Goyal, Aston Zhang, Bo Xiong, Rui Hou, Melanie Kambadur, Dhruv Mahajan, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Liang Tan
| Challenge: | a recent study has found that preference learning is a key tool for enhancing LLM training and alignment. |
| Approach: | They use a synthetic data generation pipeline to generate 48,000 unique instruction-following prompts with 23 verifiable constraints to obtain preference pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline generates 48,000 unique instruction-following prompts with 23 verifiable constraints that enable fine-grained and automated quality assessments of model responses. |
CM-Align: Consistency-based Multilingual Alignment for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current large language models (LLMs) show a significant performance gap in alignment between English and other languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a consistency-based method to construct high-quality multilingual preference data for improving multilingual alignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is based on three LLMs and three common tasks and shows that it performs better than current methods. |