AJ-Bench: Benchmarking Agent-as-a-Judge for Environment-Aware Evaluation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Wentao Shi, Yu Wang, Yuyang Zhao, Yuxin Chen, Fuli Feng, Xueyuan Hao, Xi Su, Qi GU, Hui Su, Xunliang Cai, Xiangnan He
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to verify agent behaviors in complex environments rely on rule-based verifiers or LLM-as-a-Judge models. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate Agent-as-a-Judge across three domains . the benchmark covers search, data systems, and graphical user interfaces - with 155 tasks and 516 trajectories . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark outperforms existing benchmarks in search, data systems, and GUI domains while revealing open challenges in agent-based verification. |
Similar Papers
R-Judge: Benchmarking Safety Risk Awareness for LLM Agents (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Tongxin Yuan, Zhiwei He, Lingzhong Dong, Yiming Wang, Ruijie Zhao, Tian Xia, Lizhen Xu, Binglin Zhou, Fangqi Li, Zhuosheng Zhang, Rui Wang, Gongshen Liu
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have shown compelling abilities in reasoning, decision-making, and instruction following. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the proficiency of large language models (LLMs) in judging and identifying safety risks given agent interaction records. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the best-performing model, GPT-4o, while no other models significantly exceed the random. |
Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agents (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shihan Deng, Weikai Xu, Hongda Sun, Wei Liu, Tao Tan, Liujianfeng Liujianfeng, Ang Li, Jian Luan, Bin Wang, Rui Yan, Shuo Shang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for LLM-based mobile agents are insufficient to evaluate their capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLM-based mobile agents' planning capabilities . they expand UI operations by incorporating 103 APIs to accelerate task completion . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks are based on 103 collected APIs and real user queries . the data is categorized into three distinct groups: SAST, SAMT, and MAMT . |
A Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Asaf Yehudai, Lilach Eden, Alan Li, Guy Uziel, Yilun Zhao, Roy Bar-Haim, Arman Cohan, Michal Shmueli-Scheuer
| Challenge: | This paper provides the first comprehensive survey of evaluation methods for LLM-based agents . LLMs are static, having fixed knowledge, and confined to text-to-text interaction. |
| Approach: | They analyze the evaluation of LLM-based agents across five perspectives . they identify current trends and key gaps in evaluation methods . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation frameworks and tools are based on five perspectives . the results highlight current trends and identify gaps in future research . |
MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Guoli Yin, Haoping Bai, Shuang Ma, Feng Nan, Yanchao Sun, Zhaoyang Xu, Shen Ma, Jiarui Lu, Xiang Kong, Aonan Zhang, Dian Ang Yap, Yizhe Zhang, Karsten Ahnert, Vik Kamath, Mathias Berglund, Dominic Walsh, Tobias Gindele, Juergen Wiest, Zhengfeng Lai, Xiaoming Simon Wang, Jiulong Shan, Meng Cao, Ruoming Pang, Zirui Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on specific application scenarios, emphasizing task completion but failing to dissect the underlying skills that drive these outcomes. |
| Approach: | They propose a Massive Multitask Agent Understanding benchmark that evaluates LLMs across five domains and offline tasks. |
| Outcome: | The Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark evaluates models across five domains including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics. |
ABC-Bench: Benchmarking Agentic Backend Coding in Real-World Development (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jie Yang, Honglin Guo, Li Ji, Jiazheng Zhou, Rui Zheng, Zhikai Lei, Shuo Zhang, Zhiheng Xi, Shichun Liu, Yuxin Wang, Bo Wang, Yining Zheng, Tao Gui, Xipeng Qiu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have redefined the role of AI in software engineering . current benchmarks focus on localized code generation, but neglect dynamic, full-process requirements of real-world engineering. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate agentic backend coding within a realistic, executable workflow. |
| Outcome: | The ABC-Bench benchmark evaluates agentic backend coding within a realistic, executable workflow. |
Multi-Agent-as-Judge: Aligning LLM-Agent-Based Automated Evaluation with Multi-Dimensional Human Evaluation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jiaju Chen, Yuxuan Lu, Xiaojie Wang, Huimin Zeng, Jing Huang, Jiri Gesi, Ying Xu, Bingsheng Yao, Dakuo Wang
| Challenge: | Existing "LLM-as-a-judge" evaluation frameworks are limited by persona descriptions and are not generalizable to other tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that can automatically construct multiple evaluator personas with distinct dimensions from relevant text documents and instantiate LLM agents with the persona. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can believably simulate human evaluators . it extracts stakeholders' diverse perspectives from the provided research papers and constructs personas for the agents . |
AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Keyu Li, Junhao Shi, Yang Xiao, Mohan Jiang, Jie Sun, Yunze Wu, Dayuan Fu, Shijie Xia, Xiaojie Cai, Tianze Xu, Weiye Si, Wenjie Li, Dequan Wang, Pengfei Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on single agentic capability, failing to capture long-horizon real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates 6 agentic capabilities across 32 real-world scenarios. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that closed-source models outperform open-source model (48.4% vs 32.1%) integrating models with advanced scaffolds to form autonomous agents is a paradigm shift. |
CodeJudgeBench: Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Coding Tasks (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to judge code, but their reliability remains poorly understood. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate Large Language Models as code judges . they find that small reasoning models outperform larger non-reasoning models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates LLM-as-a-Judge models across three coding tasks. |
JuStRank: Benchmarking LLM Judges for System Ranking (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has focused on instance-based evaluation of LLM judges, where a judge is evaluated over a set of responses, or response pairs, while being agnostic to their source systems. |
| Approach: | They propose to validate the quality of the LLM judge itself by comparing system scores to a human-based ranking. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model fails to validate the quality of the judge itself, ignoring critical factors affecting system-level ranking, such as a judge’s positive or negative bias towards certain systems. |
LRBench and Judge-R1: Principled Evaluation and Training of LLM-Based Judges for Long-Context Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating large language models (LLMs) under long contexts are underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) that combines reinforcement learning with multi-turn search to enable grounded and principle-aware evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms single-turn baselines across domains and principles. |