ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yibo Yan, Shen Wang, Jiahao Huo, Hang Li, Boyan Li, Jiamin Su, Xiong Gao, YiFan Zhang, Tianlong Xu, Zhendong Chu, Aoxiao Zhong, Kun Wang, Hui Xiong, Philip S. Yu, Xuming Hu, Qingsong Wen
| Challenge: | Current mathematical benchmarks focus on evaluating MLLMs’ problem-solving ability, yet there is a crucial gap in addressing more complex scenarios such as error detection. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate multimodal error detection by evaluating two sub-tasks error step identification and error categorization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task evaluates MLLMs' ability to handle multimodal questions compared to text-only models. |
Similar Papers
Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning (MMIR): A New Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are predominantly trained on consistent visual-textual inputs, leaving open the question of whether they can handle semantic mismatches in layout-rich content. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multimodal inconsistency reasoning to assess MLLMs' ability to reason about semantic mismatches in webpages, presentation slides, and posters. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models in detecting inconsistencies in webpages, presentation slides, and posters while remaining vulnerable to inconsistent errors. |
MLLM-Bench: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs with Per-sample Criteria (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wentao Ge, Shunian Chen, Hardy Chen, Nuo Chen, Junying Chen, Zhihong Chen, Wenya Xie, Shuo Yan, ChenghaoZhu ChenghaoZhu, Ziyue Lin, Dingjie Song, Xidong Wang, Anningzhe Gao, Zhang Zhiyi, Jianquan Li, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methodologies for multimodal large language models are limited in evaluating objective queries without considering real-world user experiences. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria using potent MLLM as the judge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation paradigm shows that it can be used to evaluate multimodal large language models with per-sample criteria. |
A Survey of Mathematical Reasoning in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Model: Benchmark, Method & Challenges (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yibo Yan, Jiamin Su, Jianxiang He, Fangteng Fu, Xu Zheng, Yuanhuiyi Lyu, Kun Wang, Shen Wang, Qingsong Wen, Xuming Hu
| Challenge: | This survey provides **the first comprehensive analysis of mathematical reasoning in the era of multimodal large language models** . integrating large language model with mathematical reasoning tasks is becoming significant as AI advances . |
| Approach: | They review over 200 studies published since 2021 and examine the state-of-the-art developments in Math-LLMs . they identify five major challenges hindering the realization of AGI in this domain . |
| Outcome: | The authors examine the state-of-the-art developments in Math-LLMs with a focus on multimodal settings. |
Are Multimodal LLMs Robust Against Adversarial Perturbations? RoMMath: A Systematic Evaluation on Multimodal Math Reasoning (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent-released MLLMs have shown remarkable performance on various multimodal math reasoning benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They introduce RoMMath, the first benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities and robustness of multimodal large language models in handling multimodal math reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on a broad spectrum of 17 MLLMs and demonstrates that they are robust to adversarial perturbations. |
MultiChartQA: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Multi-Chart Problems (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing chart understanding benchmarks focus on single-chart tasks, neglecting multi-hop reasoning required to extract and integrate information from multiple charts. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates MLLMs’ capabilities in four key areas: direct question answering, parallel question answering and comparative reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates MLLMs’ capabilities in four key areas: direct question answering, parallel question answering and comparative reasoning. |
Exploring and Evaluating Multimodal Knowledge Reasoning Consistency of Multimodal Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | MLLMs have achieved significant breakthroughs in understanding across text and vision, but current models still face inconsistencies in reasoning outcomes. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate multimodal large language models using a multimodal knowledge reasoning dataset to examine the extent of consistency degradation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation tasks show that MLLMs are inefficient at integrating knowledge across modalities . |
Exploring Response Uncertainty in MLLMs: An Empirical Evaluation under Misleading Scenarios (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yunkai Dang, Mengxi Gao, Yibo Yan, Xin Zou, Yanggan Gu, Jungang Li, Jingyu Wang, Peijie Jiang, Aiwei Liu, Jia Liu, Xuming Hu
| Challenge: | Existing studies have focused mainly on visual–textual misalignment, leaving largely unexplored the MLLMs’ ability to preserve an original correct answer when confronted with misleading information. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage evaluation pipeline to quantify the response uncertainty phenomenon by eliciting each model’s original response on unperturbed inputs and injecting explicit (false-answer hints) and implicit (contextual contradictions) misleading instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model overturns a correct answer in 65% of cases after receiving a single deceptive cue. |
MMRefine: Unveiling the Obstacles to Robust Refinement in Multimodal Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances have enabled MLLMs to tackle complex challenges such as mathematical reasoning and multimodal understanding. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal refinement benchmark to evaluate the refinement capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) the benchmark categorizes errors into six error types to highlight areas for improvement in effective reasoning enhancement. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates the refinement capabilities of multimodal large language models across six scenarios. |
Unveiling Uncertainty: A Deep Dive into Calibration and Performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models combine visual and textual data for tasks like image captioning and visual question answering. |
| Approach: | They propose temperature scaling and iterative prompt optimization to calibrate MLLMs and enhance model reliability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed techniques improve MLLMs and improve model reliability. |
Towards Unified Multimodal Large Language Models: A survey (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are emerging but lack a systematic framework to connect them and situate current trends within a broader landscape. |
| Approach: | They present a systematic review of unified Multimodal Large Language Models . they outline the foundational concepts and prerequisites for understanding them . |
| Outcome: | The present review provides a systematic and systematic overview of unified MLLMs . it discusses persistent challenges and identify promising directions for future research . |