IHEval: Evaluating Language Models on Following the Instruction Hierarchy (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zhihan Zhang, Shiyang Li, Zixuan Zhang, Xin Liu, Haoming Jiang, Xianfeng Tang, Yifan Gao, Zheng Li, Haodong Wang, Zhaoxuan Tan, Yichuan Li, Qingyu Yin, Bing Yin, Meng Jiang
| Challenge: | Instruction-tuned language models (LMs) are increasingly deployed as interactive services across various applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate models' ability to follow the instruction hierarchy by comparing their models to a set of benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers 3,538 examples across nine tasks covering cases where instructions in different priorities either align or conflict. |
Similar Papers
Reasoning Up the Instruction Ladder for Controllable Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current models struggle to balance competing directives, causing conflicting instructions. |
| Approach: | They propose to reframe instruction hierarchy resolution as a reasoning task . they use a training dataset to enable this capability by transferring general reasoning capabilities to instruction prioritization . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on safety-critical scenarios beyond the training distribution and jailbreaks. |
Advancing Language Models through Instruction Tuning: Recent Progress and Challenges (2025.emnlp-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | tutorial addresses three critical questions within the field of instruction tuning: (1) What are the current focal points in instruction tuning research? (2) What are best practices in training an instruction-following model? (3) What new challenges have emerged? |
| Approach: | This tutorial presents a systematic overview of recent advances in instruction tuning. |
| Outcome: | The tutorial covers different stages in model training: supervised fine-tuning, preference optimization, and reinforcement learning. |
The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Seungone Kim, Juyoung Suk, Ji Yong Cho, Shayne Longpre, Chaeeun Kim, Dongkeun Yoon, Guijin Son, Yejin Cho, Sheikh Shafayat, Jinheon Baek, Sue Hyun Park, Hyeonbin Hwang, Jinkyung Jo, Hyowon Cho, Haebin Shin, Seongyun Lee, Hanseok Oh, Noah Lee, Namgyu Ho, Se June Joo, Miyoung Ko, Yoonjoo Lee, Hyungjoo Chae, Jamin Shin, Joel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Bill Yuchen Lin, Sean Welleck, Graham Neubig, Moontae Lee, Kyungjae Lee, Minjoon Seo
| Challenge: | a recent study evaluated language models using abstract evaluation criteria that lack the flexibility and granularity of human assessment. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate nine distinct language models' capabilities . they use instance-specific evaluation criteria to mirror human evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates nine distinct capabilities of language models across 77 tasks. |
How do Language Models Reshape Entity Alignment? A Survey of LM-Driven EA Methods: Advances, Benchmarks, and Future (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Entity alignment (EA) is critical for knowledge graph (KG) integration. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy that categorizes methods in three stages: data preparation, feature embedding, and alignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy categorizes methods in three key stages: data preparation, feature embedding, and alignment. |
Find the Intention of Instruction: Comprehensive Evaluation of Instruction Understanding for Large Language Models (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | LLMs are prone to generate responses to instruction-formatted statements in an instinctive manner, rather than comprehending the underlying user intention within the given instructions. |
| Approach: | They propose to use an instruction-following capability benchmark to evaluate LLMs' instruction understanding capability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark analyzes the instruction understanding capability of large language models with four instruction candidates and a single candidate. |
The SIFo Benchmark: Investigating the Sequential Instruction Following Ability of Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Xinyi Chen, Baohao Liao, Jirui Qi, Panagiotis Eustratiadis, Christof Monz, Arianna Bisazza, Maarten Rijke
| Challenge: | Current evaluation resources for instruction following focus on single task instructions, but the instruction sequences in these benchmarks often lack coherence. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate models’ abilities to follow multiple instructions through sequential instruction following tasks using four tasks to assess different aspects of sequential instruction followed. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark outperforms open-source and closed-source models on four tasks assessing different aspects of sequential instruction following. |
InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yiwei Qin, Kaiqiang Song, Yebowen Hu, Wenlin Yao, Sangwoo Cho, Xiaoyang Wang, Xuansheng Wu, Fei Liu, Pengfei Liu, Dong Yu
| Challenge: | Existing methods for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) ability to follow instructions have not been able to provide a detailed analysis of their compliance with instructions. |
| Approach: | They propose a new metric for evaluating Large Language Models' ability to follow instructions and a benchmark for DRFR. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric and benchmark compared with traditional scoring methods and explores annotation sources including human experts, crowd-sourced workers, and GPT-4. |
CAMIEval: Enhancing NLG Evaluation through Multidimensional Comparative Instruction-Following Analysis (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Evaluating the quality of texts generated by language models has always been a challenging task in natural language processing (NLP). |
| Approach: | They propose a multidimensional comparative evaluation method based on instruction-following that combines relevance, factuality, and adherence with a concrete Chain-of-Thoughts process to enhance the accuracy of evaluations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods in correlation with human evaluations on two NLG evaluation benchmarks. |
Towards Better Value Principles for Large Language Model Alignment: A Systematic Evaluation and Enhancement (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable performance across tasks . alignment with human values is critical for their responsible development. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that evaluates value principles along three desirable properties . they propose supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning-based approaches . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves value principles along the three desirable properties of LLMs. |
Beyond Value Benchmarks: Measuring Value-Structure Alignment in Large Language Models via Symmetric Q-Sorts (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) focus on item-level behavioral metrics without capturing how models prioritize competing values as a whole. |
| Approach: | They propose a symmetric human-LLM evaluation framework to measure value-structure alignment . they evaluate 12 LLMs across four model families via 240 replicated Q-sorts . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework measures value-structure alignment across four model families. |