Mitigating Hallucinated Translations in Large Language Models with Hallucination-focused Preference Optimization (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Machine Translation (MT) systems based on fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) are at a higher risk of generating hallucinations, which can severely undermine user’s trust and safety. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that intrinsically learns to mitigate hallucinations during the model training phase. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces hallucinations by 89% on an average across three unseen target languages while preserving translation quality. |
Similar Papers
Mitigating Hallucinations and Off-target Machine Translation with Source-Contrastive and Language-Contrastive Decoding (2024.eacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Hallucinations and off-target translations remain unsolved problems in machine translation, especially for low-resource languages and massively multilingual models. |
| Approach: | They propose two methods to mitigate hallucinations and off-target translations with a modified decoding objective without retraining or external models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods reduce translation errors with segment-level chrF2 below 10 by 67-83% on average across 57 tested translation directions. |
How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate across Languages? On Realistic Multilingual Estimation of LLM Hallucination (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | despite LLMs becoming increasingly multilingual, most studies on detecting and quantifying LLM hallucination are English-centric . |
| Approach: | They train a multilingual hallucination detection model and conduct a large-scale study across 30 languages and 6 open-source LLM families. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on an English-centric model and annotates gold data for five high-resource languages. |
Contrastive Decoding Reduces Hallucinations in Large Multilingual Machine Translation Models (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Hallucinations occur when the target side sentence is detached from the source side sentence, or in other words, when there is a low contribution of the source sentence to the generation of the target sentence. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Contrastive Decoding to maximise the log-likelihood difference between a model and the same model with reduced contribution from the encoder outputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm maximises the log-likelihood difference between a model and the same model with reduced contribution from the encoder outputs. |
Regularized Contrastive Decoding with Hard Negative Samples for LLM Hallucination Mitigation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models are prone to generate hallucinations, which can undermine their reliability in high-stakes applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to capture hallucination signals for mitigating hallucis in large language models by regularizing the model's internal signals to a weaker model . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves better hallucination mitigation performance on four benchmarks. |
Word Alignment as Preference for Machine Translation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Hallucination and omission are a problem in machine translation because of an LLM's size and low-resource languages. |
| Approach: | They propose to use word alignment as preference to optimize an LLM-based MT model to mitigate hallucination and omission problems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is able to mitigate hallucination and omission by using word alignment as preference. |
Mitigating Hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Model via Hallucination-targeted Direct Preference Optimization (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are known to hallucinate, which limits their practical applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that uses three types of preference pairs to target hallucinations from their diverse forms and causes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method surpasses most state-of-the-art methods and shows potential for further improvements. |
Addressing Bias and Hallucination in Large Language Models (2024.lrec-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
Nihar Ranjan Sahoo, Ashita Saxena, Kishan Maharaj, Arif A. Ahmad, Abhijit Mishra, Pushpak Bhattacharyya
| Challenge: | This tutorial provides a comprehensive overview of two critical aspects of Large Language Models: bias and hallucination. |
| Approach: | This tutorial provides an overview of two critical aspects of Large Language Models: bias and hallucination. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial delves into the complex dimensions of Large Language Models (LLMs) it outlines ethical considerations pertinent to their development and discusses hallucination, a prevalent issue in generative AI systems such as LLMs. |
The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models - An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediations (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Vipula Rawte, Swagata Chakraborty, Agnibh Pathak, Anubhav Sarkar, S.M Towhidul Islam Tonmoy, Aman Chadha, Amit Sheth, Amitava Das
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models have generated widespread acclaim, but hallucination has also emerged as a by-product. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained discourse on profiling hallucination based on its degree, orientation, and category . they categorize hallucines into six types: acronym ambiguity, generated golem, virtual voice, geographic erratum, time wrap . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method categorizes hallucination into six types based on their degree, orientation, and category . |
V-DPO: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Vision-Guided Direct Preference Optimization (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large vision-language models suffer from hallucination due to over-reliance on the Large Language Model (LLM) backbone. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to improve visual context learning by using a large-scale preference learning algorithm to improve hallucination. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on human-annotated hallucination datasets. |
Tutorial Proposal: Hallucination in Large Language Models (2024.lrec-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Grasping the intricacies of hallucination in LLMs can be daunting, especially for those new to the field. |
| Approach: | This tutorial aims to bridge the gap between the field and the field of hallucination . it will explore the key aspects of hallucinonation, including benchmarking, detection, and mitigation techniques . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial will explore the key aspects of hallucination in LLMs . it will also explore the specific constraints and shortcomings of current approaches . |