MedEthicEval: Evaluating Large Language Models Based on Chinese Medical Ethics (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have been used in clinical decision support, medical education and patient communication. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate large language models in the domain of medical ethics and assess their grasp of medical ethical principles and their application across diverse scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework assesses the models’ grasp of medical ethics principles and their ability to apply them across diverse scenarios. |
Similar Papers
MedRiskEval: Medical Risk Evaluation Benchmark of Language Models, On the Importance of User Perspectives in Healthcare Settings (2026.eacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Jean-Philippe Corbeil, Minseon Kim, Maxime Griot, Sheela Agarwal, Alessandro Sordoni, Francois Beaulieu, Paul Vozila
| Challenge: | Existing risk evaluations focused on general safety benchmarks, resulting in role-dependent vulnerabilities in real-world medical and clinical deployments. |
| Approach: | They propose a patient-oriented dataset called PatientSafetyBench that evaluates a variety of open- and closed-source LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark examines medical risks from 466 open- and closed-source LLMs across 5 risk categories. |
A Comprehensive Survey on the Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Healthcare (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a survey of large language models in healthcare raises critical concerns around trustworthiness . trustworthy of LLMs in healthcare remains underexplored, lacking a systematic review . |
| Approach: | a new survey examines the trustworthiness of large language models in healthcare . a review examines how each dimension affects reliability and ethical deployment of LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The present study examines the trustworthiness of large language models in healthcare . it identifies key gaps in existing approaches and challenges posed by evolving paradigms . |
LLMEval-Med: A Real-world Clinical Benchmark for Medical LLMs with Physician Validation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Ming Zhang, Yujiong Shen, Zelin Li, Huayu Sha, Binze Hu, Yuhui Wang, Chenhao Huang, Shichun Liu, Jingqi Tong, Changhao Jiang, Mingxu Chai, Zhiheng Xi, Shihan Dou, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Current medical benchmarks have limitations in question design, data sources and evaluation methods. |
| Approach: | They propose a new benchmark covering five core medical areas . it includes 2,996 questions created from real-world electronic health records . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model covers five core medical areas and includes 2,996 questions created from real-world electronic health records and expert-designed clinical scenarios. |
CliMedBench: A Large-Scale Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Medical Large Language Models in Clinical Scenarios (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chinese medical large language models (LLMs) are underperforming on this benchmark, especially where medical reasoning and factual consistency are vital. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark with 14 expert-guided clinical scenarios to assess the medical ability of large language models across 7 pivot dimensions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark has been validated in several ways. |
Beyond the Leaderboard: Rethinking Medical Benchmarks for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are proving significant potential in healthcare, prompting numerous benchmarks to evaluate their capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that deconstructs benchmark development into five stages from design to governance and provides a checklist of 46 medically-tailored criteria. |
| Outcome: | The framework deconstructs benchmark development into five stages from design to governance and provides a comprehensive checklist of 46 medically-tailored criteria. |
Large Language Models Are Poor Clinical Decision-Makers: A Comprehensive Benchmark (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Fenglin Liu, Zheng Li, Hongjian Zhou, Qingyu Yin, Jingfeng Yang, Xianfeng Tang, Chen Luo, Ming Zeng, Haoming Jiang, Yifan Gao, Priyanka Nigam, Sreyashi Nag, Bing Yin, Yining Hua, Xuan Zhou, Omid Rohanian, Anshul Thakur, Lei Clifton, David Clifton
| Challenge: | Existing studies focus on evaluating large language models in close-ended QA tasks, but many clinical decisions involve answering open-ended questions without pre-set options. |
| Approach: | They construct a benchmark to better understand large language models in the clinic . they use existing datasets to evaluate LLMs in clinical situations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms human experts in multiple medical tasks. |
Med-CoDE: Medical Critique based Disagreement Evaluation Framework (2025.naacl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods for large language models lack robustness and accuracy in medical contexts. |
| Approach: | They propose an evaluation framework for medical LLMs that measures disagreement between model-generated responses and established medical ground truths. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework captures accuracy and reliability in medical settings. |
Benchmarking LLMs on Authentic Cases from Medical Journals (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing medical benchmarks suffer from performance saturation due to medical exam questions. |
| Approach: | They evaluate the performance of over 20 open-source and proprietary large language models and benchmark them against human medical experts. |
| Outcome: | The new benchmark is based on authentic clinical cases sourced from medical journals and implements rigorous human review process to ensure the quality and reliability of the benchmark. |
Should I Believe in What Medical AI Says? A Chinese Benchmark for Medication Based on Knowledge and Reasoning (2025.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) generate hallucinations when handling unfamiliar information. |
| Approach: | They propose a Chinese benchmark to evaluate large language models' knowledge and reasoning capabilities in medication tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates models in indication, dosage and administration, contraindicated population, mechanisms of action, drug recommendation, and drug interaction across six datasets. |
From Scores to Steps: Diagnosing and Improving LLM Performance in Evidence-Based Medical Calculations (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Benlu Wang, Iris Xia, Yifan Zhang, Junda Wang, null Feiyun Ouyang, Shuo Han, Arman Cohan, Hong Yu, Zonghai Yao
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks assess only the final answer with a wide numerical tolerance, overlooking systematic reasoning failures and potentially causing serious clinical misjudgments. |
| Approach: | They propose a new step-by-step evaluation pipeline that assesses formula selection, entity extraction, and arithmetic computation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the accuracy of large language models on medical benchmarks from 16.35% to 53.19%. |