DecisionFlow: Advancing Large Language Model as Principled Decision Maker (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current language models lack the structured deliberation needed for high-stakes tasks such as healthcare and finance. |
| Approach: | They propose a decision-making framework that guides models to reason over structured representations of actions, attributes, and constraints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves up to 30% accuracy gains over strong prompting baselines and enhances alignment in outcomes. |
Similar Papers
LP Data Pipeline: Lightweight, Purpose-driven Data Pipeline for Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Creating high-quality datasets for large language models often relies on resource-intensive, GPU-accelerated models for quality filtering, making the process time-consuming and costly. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that operates entirely on CPUs to streamline the processes of dataset extraction, filtering, and curation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces preparation time and costs while maintaining high data quality while enhancing the applicability of LLMs in specialized contexts. |
Code to Think, Think to Code: A Survey on Code-Enhanced Reasoning and Reasoning-Driven Code Intelligence in LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Dayu Yang, Tianyang Liu, Daoan Zhang, Antoine Simoulin, Xiaoyi Liu, Yuwei Cao, Zhaopu Teng, Xin Qian, Grey Yang, Jiebo Luo, Julian McAuley
| Challenge: | Recent breakthrough models like OpenAI-o1 and DeepSeek-R1 show powerful task-solving capabilities, particularly advances in reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose future research directions that may deepen the synergy, ultimately advancing LLM performance in both complex reasoning and code intelligence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed research may deepen the synergy, ultimately advancing LLM performance in both complex reasoning and code intelligence. |
Rethinking Pragmatics in Large Language Models: Towards Open-Ended Evaluation and Preference Tuning (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to assess social-pragmatic inference in large language models are inadequacy, and preferential tuning is the best approach. |
| Approach: | They propose to use free-form models' responses as a measure to assess social-pragmatic reasoning and advocate for preference optimization over supervised finetuning (SFT). |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms supervised finetuning (SFT) and offers a near-free launch in pragmatic abilities without compromising general capabilities. |
Decisive: Guiding User Decisions with Optimal Preference Elicitation from Unstructured Documents (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for analyzing information from multiple sources are often too complex or fail to capture nuanced preferences accurately. |
| Approach: | They propose an interactive decision-making framework that combines document-grounded reasoning with Bayesian preference inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms general-purpose LLMs and existing decision-support systems in achieving up to 20% improvement in decision accuracy over strong baselines across domains. |
AdaptFlow: Adaptive Workflow Optimization via Meta-Learning (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Runchuan Zhu, Bowen Jiang, Lingrui Mei, Fangkai Yang, Lu Wang, Haoxiang Gao, Fengshuo Bai, Pu Zhao, Qingwei Lin, Saravan Rajmohan, Dongmei Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to large language models rely on static templates or manual workflows. |
| Approach: | AdaptFlow is a language-based meta-learning framework inspired by model-agnostic meta- learning. |
| Outcome: | AdaptFlow outperforms manual and automated workflows on question answering, code generation and mathematical reasoning benchmarks. |
Structured Moral Reasoning in Language Models: A Value-Grounded Evaluation Framework (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in domains requiring moral understanding, yet their reasoning often remains shallow and misaligned with human reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a value-grounded framework for evaluating and distilling structured moral reasoning in large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates 12 open-source models across four moral datasets. |
Can LLMs Reason Like Doctors? Exploring the Limits of Large Language Models in Complex Medical Reasoning (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress in reasoning across multiple domains, but it remains unclear whether their abilities reflect genuine reasoning or sophisticated pattern matching. |
| Approach: | They conduct one of the largest evaluations to date, assessing 77 LLMs . they select three medical question answering (QA) benchmarks targeting reasoning processes . |
| Outcome: | The results highlight the need to improve specific reasoning strategies to better reflect medical decision-making. |
ReasoningRec: Bridging Personalized Recommendations and Human-Interpretable Explanations through LLM Reasoning (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical evaluations demonstrate that ReasoningRec surpasses state-of-the-art methods by up to 12.5% in recommendation prediction while simultaneously providing human-intelligible explanations. |
| Approach: | They propose a reasoning-based recommendation framework that leverages Large Language Models to model users and items, focusing on preferences, aversions, and explanatory reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses state-of-the-art methods by up to 12.5% in recommendation prediction while providing human-intelligible explanations. |
Large Language Models Are Poor Clinical Decision-Makers: A Comprehensive Benchmark (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Fenglin Liu, Zheng Li, Hongjian Zhou, Qingyu Yin, Jingfeng Yang, Xianfeng Tang, Chen Luo, Ming Zeng, Haoming Jiang, Yifan Gao, Priyanka Nigam, Sreyashi Nag, Bing Yin, Yining Hua, Xuan Zhou, Omid Rohanian, Anshul Thakur, Lei Clifton, David Clifton
| Challenge: | Existing studies focus on evaluating large language models in close-ended QA tasks, but many clinical decisions involve answering open-ended questions without pre-set options. |
| Approach: | They construct a benchmark to better understand large language models in the clinic . they use existing datasets to evaluate LLMs in clinical situations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms human experts in multiple medical tasks. |
Efficient Sequential Decision Making with Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to retrain or finetune large language models (LLMs) for decision making suffer from computational burden of gradient updates. |
| Approach: | They propose a model selection algorithm that leverages online model selection algorithms to efficiently incorporate LLMs agents into sequential decision making. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms both traditional decision making algorithms and vanilla LLM agents on a large-scale Amazon dataset. |