Papers by Yize Cheng

4 papers
Schoenfeld’s Anatomy of Mathematical Reasoning by Language Models (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models expose reasoning traces, yet their underlying cognitive structure and steps remain difficult to identify and analyze beyond surface-level statistics.
Approach: They propose a framework that explicitly abstracts reasoning traces into functional reasoning steps such as Analysis, Explore, Implement, Verify, etc.
Outcome: The proposed framework reveals reproducible thinking dynamics and structural differences between reasoning and non-reasoning models, which are not apparent from token-level views.
Tool Preferences in Agentic LLMs are Unreliable (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) can now access a wide range of external tools thanks to the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
Approach: They expose a vulnerability in prevalent tool/function-calling protocols by editing tool descriptions to find out which tools are used by LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed changes in the tool descriptions can increase the usage of tools from LLMs when competing with alternatives.
DyePack: Provably Flagging Test Set Contamination in LLMs Using Backdoors (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Open benchmarks are essential for evaluating large language models, but their accessibility makes them likely targets of test set contamination.
Approach: They propose a framework that leverages backdoor attacks to flag models that used benchmark test sets during training.
Outcome: The proposed framework detects models that trained on benchmark test sets without loss of logits or internal details . it can prevent false accusations while providing strong evidence for every detected case of contamination.
Your LLM Agents are Temporally Blind: The Misalignment Between Tool Use Decisions and Human Time Perception (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language model agents assume a stationary context, failing to account for real-world time elapsed between messages.
Approach: They construct a dataset of multi-turn user–agent message trajectories across 76 scenarios . they collect human preferences between "calling a tool" and "directly answering" they also examine whether existing models lack human temporal perception .
Outcome: The results show that existing models display poor alignment with human temporal perception . the findings provide insights to foster the development of more time-aware and human-aligned agents.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations