Papers by Yupu Hao
Event Ontology Completion with Hierarchical Structure Evolution Networks (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for event detection require predefined schemas, but manual defining is expensive and labor-intensive. |
| Approach: | They propose a task to achieve event clustering, hierarchy expansion and type naming . they propose 'neighbor Contrastive Clustering' module and a Hierarchy-Aware Linking module . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms baseline methods on three datasets. |
Look Light, Think Heavy: What Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Can and Cannot Do (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing open-source models often yield only marginal overall improvements, possibly due to an overemphasis on mathematical reasoning at the expense of broader capabilities. |
| Approach: | They evaluate 12 multimodal tasks using 14 non-reasoning models and 8 reasoning models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is effective in multimodal reasoning tasks, the authors show . they show that it lacks the ability to maintain deep visual introspection throughout the reasoning process. |
Pushing the Limits of LLM Tool Calling via Experiential Knowledge Integration and Activation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches treat tool use as a problem of prompt design, API documents specification, or supervised or unsupervised alignment. |
| Approach: | They propose a knowledge-augmented tool execution framework that integrates experiential knowledge with reasoning-width-expanded inference and knowledge-aware training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves on BFCL-V3 and AppWorld on three model scales. |
Complex Event Schema Induction with Knowledge-Enriched Diffusion Model (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on event schema induction have been hindered by errors and data quality issues. |
| Approach: | They propose a knowledge-enriched discrete diffusion model that distills event scenario knowledge from LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves outstanding performance across evaluation metrics. |
SKIntern: Internalizing Symbolic Knowledge for Distilling Better CoT Capabilities into Small Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have high computational costs and privacy concerns due to their high computational expenses and data privacy. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that empowers SLMs to internalize symbolic knowledge and few-shot examples gradually through a progressive fine-tuning process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by over 5% while reducing inference costs by up to 4 across a wide range of SLMs in both in-domain (ID) and out-of domain (OOD) tasks. |
Spectral Disentanglement: Rank-Aware Task Adaptation for Rehearsal-free Continual Learning in LLMs (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Continual Learning (CL) for Large Language Models faces a fundamental Stability-Plasticity Dilemma . Rank-Blindness enforces a single rank constraint across diverse tasks, leading to catastrophic forgetting of earlier tasks and underfitting on complex new ones. |
| Approach: | They propose a rank-spectrum-based rehearsal-free framework that explicitly disentangles knowledge into two orthogonal subspaces. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves a superior stability-plasticity balance compared to single-rank baselines. |
Evaluating Personalized Tool-Augmented LLMs from the Perspectives of Personalization and Proactivity (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Personalized tool utilization is essential for aligning large language models (LLMs) with user preference in interaction scenarios with various tools. |
| Approach: | They propose a key-point-based LLM evaluation method that mitigates biases by manually annotating key points for each test case and providing them to LLM as the reference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method mitigates biases in the LLM-as-a-judge system by manually annotating key points for each test case and providing them to LLM as the reference. |