ToolHaystack: Stress-Testing Tool-Augmented Language Models in Realistic Long-Term Interactions (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Beong-woo Kwak, Minju Kim, Dongha Lim, Hyungjoo Chae, Dongjin Kang, Sunghwan Kim, Dongil Yang, Jinyoung Yeo
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations assume tool use in short contexts, offering limited insight into model behavior during realistic long-term interactions. |
| Approach: | a benchmark is a tool to test long-term tool use in large language models . the tool includes multiple tasks execution contexts and realistic noise . |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark tests the tool use capabilities in long-term interactions. |
Similar Papers
ACEBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Tool Usage (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Chen Chen, Xinlong Hao, Weiwen Liu, Xu Huang, Xingshan Zeng, Shuai Yu, Dexun Li, Yuefeng Huang, Xiangcheng Liu, Wang Xinzhi, Wu Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs’ tool usage face several limitations: limited evaluation scenarios, lacking assessments in real multi-turn dialogue contexts; narrow evaluation dimensions, with insufficient detailed assessments of how LLM use tools; and reliance on LLM or real API executions for evaluation, which introduces significant overhead. |
| Approach: | ACEBench is a benchmark for evaluating tool usage in Large Language Models . it categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
| Outcome: | ACEBench categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilities (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Jiarui Lu, Thomas Holleis, Yizhe Zhang, Bernhard Aumayer, Feng Nan, Haoping Bai, Shuang Ma, Shen Ma, Mengyu Li, Guoli Yin, Zirui Wang, Ruoming Pang
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have led to a growing interest in tool assisted LLMs . toolSandbox includes stateful tool execution, implicit state dependencies between tools . |
| Approach: | a new tool-based evaluation tool is released to help LLMs evaluate their tool-use capabilities. a tool-driven evaluation tool includes stateful tool execution, implicit state dependencies between tools and a built-in user simulator. |
| Outcome: | the toolSandbox evaluation benchmark shows that open source and proprietary models have a performance gap . the benchmarks show that even the most capable LLMs are challenged by state dependent tasks . |
Rethinking Stateful Tool Use in Multi-Turn Dialogues: Benchmarks and Challenges (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Hongru Wang, Wenyu Huang, Yufei Wang, Yuanhao Xi, Jianqiao Lu, Huan Zhang, Nan Hu, Zeming Liu, Jeff Z. Pan, Kam-Fai Wong
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks that assess Language Models (LMs) as Language Agents (LAs) for tool use focus on stateless, single-turn interactions or partial evaluations, overlooking the inherent stateful nature of interactions in multi-turn applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-turn dialogue dataset with stateful tool interactions considering the whole life cycle of tool use across six key tasks in three stages . they also build VirtualMobile – an embodied virtual mobile evaluation environment to simulate API calls and assess the robustness of the created APIs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset evaluates 13 open- and closed-source LLMs and provides detailed analysis at each stage. |
RoTBench: A Multi-Level Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models in Tool Learning (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Junjie Ye, Yilong Wu, Songyang Gao, Caishuang Huang, Sixian Li, Guanyu Li, Xiaoran Fan, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Current research emphasizes LLMs’ capacity to utilize tools in well-structured environments while overlooking their stability when confronted with the inevitable noise of the real world. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-level benchmark to evaluate the robustness of large language models in tool learning by establishing five external environments with varying levels of noise. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the GPT-4 model in tool learning in three critical phases: tool selection, parameter identification, and content filling. |
DICE-BENCH: Evaluating the Tool-Use Capabilities of Large Language Models in Multi-Round, Multi-Party Dialogues (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing function-calling benchmarks focus on single-turn interactions but ignore complexity of real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that constructs practical function-calling datasets by synthesizing conversations through a tool graph that maintains dependencies across rounds. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework synthesizes conversations through a tool graph that maintains dependencies across rounds and a multi-agent system with distinct personas to enhance dialogue naturalness. |
ToolSpectrum: Towards Personalized Tool Utilization for Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches focus on functional tool selection following user instructions while overlooking the critical role of context-aware personalization in tool selection. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs’ capabilities in personalized tool utilization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates LLMs' capabilities in personalized tool utilization. |
TRUEBench: Can LLM Response Meet Real-world Constraints as Productivity Assistant? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks fail to evaluate large language models' instruction-following capabilities . current benchmarks lack multilinguality, implicit constraints and multi-turn dialogue . |
| Approach: | a new benchmark is designed to evaluate large language models' instruction-following capabilities . the benchmark features input prompts across 12 languages and includes inter-instance multilingual instructions . |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark for large language models (LLMs) is designed to assess their performance in real-world settings. |
TAIL: A Toolkit for Automatic and Realistic Long-Context Large Language Model Evaluation (2024.emnlp-demo)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods for long-context large language models are overly simplistic and require extensive human annotations. |
| Approach: | They propose an automatic toolkit to create realistic evaluation benchmarks . they use a document-grounded benchmark to generate question-answer pairs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed toolkit provides a way to create realistic evaluation benchmarks and visualize performance metrics of evaluated models. |
StableToolBench: Towards Stable Large-Scale Benchmarking on Tool Learning of Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Zhicheng Guo, Sijie Cheng, Hao Wang, Shihao Liang, Yujia Qin, Peng Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yang Liu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have witnessed remarkable advancements in recent years, prompting the exploration of tool learning. |
| Approach: | They propose a virtual API server and stable evaluation system to assess the stability of large-scale real-time APIs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks demonstrate the stability of the proposed system and its caching system. |
ToolHop: A Query-Driven Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Hop Tool Use (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Junjie Ye, Zhengyin Du, Xuesong Yao, Weijian Lin, Yufei Xu, Zehui Chen, Zaiyuan Wang, Sining Zhu, Zhiheng Xi, Siyu Yuan, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang, Jiecao Chen
| Challenge: | Effective evaluation of multi-hop tool use is critical for analyzing the understanding, reasoning, and function-calling capabilities of large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset that provides rigorous evaluation of multi-hop tool use. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 49.04% accuracy across five model families. |