Evaluating Personalized Tool-Augmented LLMs from the Perspectives of Personalization and Proactivity (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Personalized tool utilization is essential for aligning large language models (LLMs) with user preference in interaction scenarios with various tools. |
| Approach: | They propose a key-point-based LLM evaluation method that mitigates biases by manually annotating key points for each test case and providing them to LLM as the reference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method mitigates biases in the LLM-as-a-judge system by manually annotating key points for each test case and providing them to LLM as the reference. |
Similar Papers
ToolSpectrum: Towards Personalized Tool Utilization for Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches focus on functional tool selection following user instructions while overlooking the critical role of context-aware personalization in tool selection. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs’ capabilities in personalized tool utilization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates LLMs' capabilities in personalized tool utilization. |
Personalized Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs by Individual Preferences (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current benchmarks average preferences across all users to compute aggregate ratings . this overlooks individual user preferences when establishing model rankings . |
| Approach: | They compute personalized model rankings using ELO ratings and Bradley-Terry coefficients . they find users exhibit substantial heterogeneity in topical interests and communication styles . |
| Outcome: | The results show that individual rankings of LLM models diverge dramatically from aggregate rankings . a compact combination of topic and style features provides a useful feature space . |
TAPS: Tool-Augmented Personalisation via Structured Tagging (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to personalise tool use overlook the role of personalisation in guiding tool use. |
| Approach: | They propose a tool-augmented large language model that integrates user preferences into goal-oriented dialogue agents by leveraging a structured tagging tool and an uncertainty-based tool detector. |
| Outcome: | The proposed solution significantly improves the ability of LLMs to incorporate user preferences, achieving the new state-of-the-art for open source models on the NLSI task. |
ACEBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Tool Usage (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Chen Chen, Xinlong Hao, Weiwen Liu, Xu Huang, Xingshan Zeng, Shuai Yu, Dexun Li, Yuefeng Huang, Xiangcheng Liu, Wang Xinzhi, Wu Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs’ tool usage face several limitations: limited evaluation scenarios, lacking assessments in real multi-turn dialogue contexts; narrow evaluation dimensions, with insufficient detailed assessments of how LLM use tools; and reliance on LLM or real API executions for evaluation, which introduces significant overhead. |
| Approach: | ACEBench is a benchmark for evaluating tool usage in Large Language Models . it categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
| Outcome: | ACEBench categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
LLMs + Persona-Plug = Personalized LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jiongnan Liu, Yutao Zhu, Shuting Wang, Xiaochi Wei, Erxue Min, Yu Lu, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Zhicheng Dou
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated extraordinary capabilities in natural language understanding, generation, and reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a plug-and-play LLM model that embeds a user-specific embedding for each individual by modeling her historical contexts through a lightweight plug-in user embedder module. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on various tasks in the language model personalization (LaMP) benchmark show that the proposed model significantly outperforms existing personalized LLM approaches. |
API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Minghao Li, Yingxiu Zhao, Bowen Yu, Feifan Song, Hangyu Li, Haiyang Yu, Zhoujun Li, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li
| Challenge: | Recent research has demonstrated that Large Language Models (LLMs) can enhance their capabilities by utilizing external tools. |
| Approach: | They propose a runnable evaluation system consisting of 73 API tools and an annotation system for 314 tool-use dialogues with 753 API calls. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark assesses the effectiveness of existing LLMs by analyzing 314 tool-use dialogues with 753 API calls. |
Persona-Augmented Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs Across Diverse Writing Styles (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current benchmarks for evaluating Large Language Models do not capture the rich variety of communication patterns exhibited by humans. |
| Approach: | They propose a low-cost method to emulate diverse writing styles by rewriting evaluation prompts using persona-based LLM prompting. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the external validity of the benchmarks for Large Language Models (LLMs) based on persona-based prompting. |
PEToolLLM: Towards Personalized Tool Learning in Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing tool learning studies focus on general-purpose tool-use capability, but ignore the importance of personalized tool-user preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to adapt Large Language Models to personalized tool learning task, which is trained through supervised fine-tuning and direct preference optimization. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on PEToolBench show that the proposed framework outperforms existing LLMs in the personalized tool learning task. |
Can LLM be a Personalized Judge? (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new study examines the reliability of large language models (LLMs) for personalization and role-playing evaluation without examining its validity. |
| Approach: | They investigate the reliability of LLM-as-a-Personalized-Judge for personalization . they find that personas provided to LLMs have limited predictive power . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is less reliable than previously thought, the authors show . human annotation reveals that third-person crowd worker evaluations of personalized preferences are even worse than LLM predictions. |
Adaptive Tool Use in Large Language Models with Meta-Cognition Trigger (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wenjun Li, Dexun Li, Kuicai Dong, Cong Zhang, Hao Zhang, Weiwen Liu, Yasheng Wang, Ruiming Tang, Yong Liu
| Challenge: | Existing research expands the tool arrays of large language models (LLMs), but the necessity of using these tools is often overlooked, leading to indiscriminate tool invocation. |
| Approach: | They propose a meta-cognition proxy proxy for LLMs self-assessment of their capabilities, reflecting the model’s awareness of its own limitations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed strategy is fine-tuned-free and costs minimal. |