CrowdAgent: Multi-Agent Managed Multi-Source Annotation System (2025.emnlp-demos)
Copied to clipboard
Maosheng Qin, Renyu Zhu, Mingxuan Xia, null Chenchenkai, Zhen Zhu, Minmin Lin, Junbo Zhao, Lu Xu, Changjie Fan, Runze Wu, Haobo Wang
| Challenge: | Recent approaches to annotate data focus on labeling, but lack holistic process control . a novel system that integrates task assignment, data annotation, and quality/cost management is needed . |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-agent system that integrates task assignment, data annotation, and quality/cost management. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system automates human management by using a collaborative multi-agent system. |
Similar Papers
Task Assignment meets Annotator Modeling: Human-LLM Collaborative Annotation with Constraints (2026.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to label annotation are labor-intensive and time-consuming. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that estimates per-task accuracy from task features using a learning from crowds model and incorporates these estimations into a linear programming formulation that assigns tasks under practical constraints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves comparable accuracy to baseline methods while satisfying given constraints. |
MEGAnno+: A Human-LLM Collaborative Annotation System (2024.eacl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) can label data faster and cheaper than humans . however, they may fall short in understanding of complex contexts, leading to incorrect labels . |
| Approach: | They propose a collaborative approach where humans and LLMs work together to produce reliable labels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system can produce reliable and high-quality labels faster and cheaper than humans . compared to traditional models, it can generate labels faster, at a lower cost . |
Aggregating Crowd of LLMs for Cost-Effective Data Annotation (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise for automated data annotation, yet reliance on expensive commercial models like GPT-4 limits accessibility. |
| Approach: | They propose to build a crowd of LLMs which aggregates annotations from multiple sLLMs using label aggregation algorithms. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms individual sLLMs and human crowd labels yields superior results compared to either method alone. |
BNLP: A Text Annotation Platform for Quality Control of LLM-Generated Annotations (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing annotation tools lack support for Large Language Models (LLMs) or use LLMs as one-off preannotation engines, compromising data reliability. |
| Approach: | They propose a text annotation platform that embeds LLM-assisted labeling into a quality-aware collaborative workflow. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that BNLP reduces annotation time by 74.3% and improves annotation quality by 11.6% over purely manual annotation in LLM-assisted settings. |
WorkTeam: Constructing Workflows from Natural Language with Multi-Agents (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing workflow construction methods require specialized knowledge and task-switching skills. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-agent workflow framework that incorporates a supervisor, orchestrator, and filler agent. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly increases the success rate of workflow construction . the proposed framework is based on a dataset of 3,695 real-world business samples . |
Auto-SLURP: A Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Multi-Agent Frameworks in Smart Personal Assistant (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Auto-SLURP is a benchmark dataset for evaluating multi-agent frameworks powered by large language models. |
| Approach: | Auto-SLURP is a benchmark dataset aimed at evaluating LLM-based multi-agent frameworks . authors propose it extends original SLURP dataset by relabeling data and integrating simulated servers and external services. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset extends the original SLURP dataset for natural language understanding tasks. |
Decoding Time Series with LLMs: A Multi-Agent Framework for Cross-Domain Annotation (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
Minhua Lin, Zhengzhang Chen, Yanchi Liu, Xujiang Zhao, Zongyu Wu, Junxiang Wang, Xiang Zhang, Suhang Wang, Haifeng Chen
| Challenge: | Time series data is ubiquitous across various domains, including manufacturing, finance, and healthcare. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-agent system to generate general and domain-specific annotations for time series data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system outperforms existing methods on synthetic and real-world datasets. |
Crowd-sourcing annotation of complex NLU tasks: A case study of argumentative content annotation (D19-59)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in machine reading and listening comprehension involve the annotation of long texts. |
| Approach: | They propose a way to perform a sentence-by-sentence annotation task with crowd annotators. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can be used to identify claims in a debate speech. |
Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasets (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Having only a few workers generate the majority of dataset examples raises concerns about data diversity . |
| Approach: | They perform a series of experiments to investigate annotator biases in recent NLU datasets . they find that models are able to recognize the most productive annotators . |
| Outcome: | The results show that models can recognize the most productive annotators and do not generalize well to examples from annotator that did not contribute to the training set. |
AgentGym: Evaluating and Training Large Language Model-based Agents across Diverse Environments (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zhiheng Xi, Yiwen Ding, Wenxiang Chen, Boyang Hong, Honglin Guo, Junzhe Wang, Xin Guo, Dingwen Yang, Chenyang Liao, Wei He, Songyang Gao, Lu Chen, Rui Zheng, Yicheng Zou, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang, Zuxuan Wu, Yu-Gang Jiang
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are promising foundations to build generally-capable agents . however, the community lacks a unified interactive framework that covers diverse environments for comprehensive evaluation of agents. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that features 7 real-world scenarios, 14 environments, and 89 tasks for unified, real-time, and concurrent agent interaction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework features 7 real-world scenarios, 14 environments, and 89 tasks for unified, real-time, and concurrent agent interaction. |