Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) generate outputs that stray from user input or contravene established knowledge.
Approach: They propose a new phenomenon, Authority Bias, where LLMs favor one knowledge source over the other . they propose atomic information that generates conflicts and a Conflict Detection Enhanced Query framework .
Outcome: The proposed framework reduces Authority bias in large language models . it detects conflicts, performs credibility assessment on conflicting paragraphs, and detects perturbed text .

Similar Papers

LLMs are Biased Evaluators But Not Biased for Fact-Centric Retrieval Augmented Generation (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) exhibit significant biases in evaluation tasks, especially in preferentially rating and favoring self-generated content.
Approach: They propose to simulate two critical phases of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks where keyword extraction and factual accuracy take precedence over stylistic elements.
Outcome: The proposed model emulates two critical phases of the retrieval-augmented generation framework.
No Free Lunch: Retrieval-Augmented Generation Undermines Fairness in LLMs, Even for Vigilant Users (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrieval-augmented generation is widely adopted for its effectiveness and cost-efficiency in mitigating hallucinations.
Approach: They propose a practical three-level threat model from the perspective of user fairness awareness.
Outcome: The proposed model shows that RAG can undermine fairness alignment without fine-tuning or retraining.
Mitigating Bias in RAG: Controlling the Embedder (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a promising modular AI system enhances factuality and privacy in large language models . however, each component introduces its own biases into the RAG system, which could cause representational harm and unsafe user interactions.
Approach: They study the conflict between biases of each component and their relationship to the overall bias of the retrieval augmented generation system.
Outcome: The proposed model can be controlled by the embedder while maintaining utility . the proposed model is more fair than existing models, the authors show .
Do RAG Systems Really Suffer From Positional Bias? (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) improves the factual accuracy of LLMs on knowledgeintensive tasks by including in the prompt passages retrieved from an external corpus.
Approach: They propose to use a retrieval algorithm to add passages from an external corpus to the LLM prompt to improve the factual accuracy of LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed approach improves the factual accuracy of LLMs on knowledgeintensive tasks by including in the prompt passages retrieved from an external corpus.
LLM-Generated Text May Harm Your Retrieval! A Robust Detection Strategy for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves accuracy and timeliness of large language models, but external corpora may become contaminated with LLM-generated texts.
Approach: They propose a method that integrates external knowledge retrieved from external sources into RAG to filter out LLM-generated texts from retrieved results.
Outcome: The proposed method mitigates performance degradation and improves stability of RAG systems.
LLM-Independent Adaptive RAG: Let the Question Speak for Itself (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to retrieve Large Language Models (LLMs) are inefficient and impractical.
Approach: They propose a lightweight adaptive retrieval method that leverages external information to achieve comparable quality while achieving significant efficiency gains.
Outcome: The proposed methods achieve comparable quality while achieving significant efficiency gains on 6 QA datasets.
RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Models (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a main technique for alleviating hallucinations in large language models.
Approach: They propose to integrate RAG into large language models to analyze word-level hallucinations using a corpus of 18,000 naturally generated responses from diverse LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed model can fine tune a relatively small LLM and achieve a competitive hallucination detection performance when compared to the existing prompt-based approaches.
Evaluation of Attribution Bias in Generator-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Prior work has focused on improving and evaluating the attribution quality of large language models (LLMs) but this may come at the expense of inducing biases in the attributed answers.
Approach: They propose to evaluate attribution sensitivity and bias with respect to authorship information in large language models (LLMs) in retrieval-augmented generation pipelines.
Outcome: The proposed framework can significantly improve the attribution quality of large language models (LLMs) in retrieval-augmented generation pipelines by adding authorship information to source documents.
Does RAG Introduce Unfairness in LLMs? Evaluating Fairness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models address fairness concerns with respect to sensitive attributes such as gender, geographic location, and other demographic factors.
Approach: They propose a framework to evaluate fairness in RAG using scenario-based questions and analyzing disparities across demographic attributes.
Outcome: The proposed framework analyzes disparities across demographic attributes and identifies fairness issues in retrieval and generation stages.
Astute RAG: Overcoming Imperfect Retrieval Augmentation and Knowledge Conflicts for Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have not linked the behavior of retrieval augmented generation (RAG) with imperfect retrieval, including irrelevant, misleading, or even malicious information.
Approach: They propose an approach that integrates external knowledge with source-awareness to overcome imperfect retrieval errors in RAG.
Outcome: The proposed approach is superior to previous robustness-enhanced approaches under the worst-case scenario.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations