Challenge: Retrieval-augmented generation is widely adopted for its effectiveness and cost-efficiency in mitigating hallucinations.
Approach: They propose a practical three-level threat model from the perspective of user fairness awareness.
Outcome: The proposed model shows that RAG can undermine fairness alignment without fine-tuning or retraining.

Similar Papers

Does RAG Introduce Unfairness in LLMs? Evaluating Fairness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models address fairness concerns with respect to sensitive attributes such as gender, geographic location, and other demographic factors.
Approach: They propose a framework to evaluate fairness in RAG using scenario-based questions and analyzing disparities across demographic attributes.
Outcome: The proposed framework analyzes disparities across demographic attributes and identifies fairness issues in retrieval and generation stages.
The Good and The Bad: Exploring Privacy Issues in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a powerful technique to facilitate language model generation with proprietary and private data, where data privacy is . a privacy issue that is currently under-explored, is posed by RAG.
Approach: They propose to use retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to facilitate language model generation with proprietary and private data where data privacy is a pivotal concern.
Outcome: The proposed attack methods demonstrate that RAG can mitigate the old risks, i.e., leakage of the LLMs’ training data.
LLM-Generated Text May Harm Your Retrieval! A Robust Detection Strategy for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves accuracy and timeliness of large language models, but external corpora may become contaminated with LLM-generated texts.
Approach: They propose a method that integrates external knowledge retrieved from external sources into RAG to filter out LLM-generated texts from retrieved results.
Outcome: The proposed method mitigates performance degradation and improves stability of RAG systems.
Your RAG is Unfair: Exposing Fairness Vulnerabilities in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Backdoor Attacks (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances factual grounding but introduces new attack surfaces, particularly through backdoor attacks.
Approach: They propose a framework that exposes fairness vulnerabilities in RAG through a two-phase backdoor attack.
Outcome: Empirical results show that BiasRAG achieves high attack success rates while remaining undetectable under standard fairness evaluations.
LLMs Trust Humans More, That’s a Problem! Unveiling and Mitigating the Authority Bias in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) generate outputs that stray from user input or contravene established knowledge.
Approach: They propose a new phenomenon, Authority Bias, where LLMs favor one knowledge source over the other . they propose atomic information that generates conflicts and a Conflict Detection Enhanced Query framework .
Outcome: The proposed framework reduces Authority bias in large language models . it detects conflicts, performs credibility assessment on conflicting paragraphs, and detects perturbed text .
Fair RAG: End-to-End Fairness Across Retrieval and Generation (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) can amplify demographic bias by generating skewed context . prior work treats fairness in retrieval or generation in isolation, leaving end-to-end fairness underexplored .
Approach: They propose a pipeline that jointly controls both retrieval and generation stages . large language models can handle a broad set of inference tasks, they argue .
Outcome: The proposed pipeline reduces retriever-side skew and achieves lowest generator-side disparity while preserving utility.
RAG LLMs are Not Safer: A Safety Analysis of Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Efforts to ensure the safety of large language models (LLMs) include safety fine-tuning, evaluation, and red teaming.
Approach: They conduct a comparative analysis of RAG and non-RAG frameworks with eleven LLMs to examine how RAG can make models less safe and change their safety profile.
Outcome: The proposed methods are less effective than those used for non-RAG settings.
LLMs are Biased Evaluators But Not Biased for Fact-Centric Retrieval Augmented Generation (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) exhibit significant biases in evaluation tasks, especially in preferentially rating and favoring self-generated content.
Approach: They propose to simulate two critical phases of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks where keyword extraction and factual accuracy take precedence over stylistic elements.
Outcome: The proposed model emulates two critical phases of the retrieval-augmented generation framework.
Stable-RAG: Mitigating Retrieval-Permutation-Induced Hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing RAG methods focus on enhancing LLM robustness to low-quality retrieval, but neither address permutation sensitivity.
Approach: They propose a method that exploits permutation sensitivity to mitigate hallucinations in Large Language Models.
Outcome: The proposed model improves answer accuracy, reasoning consistency, and generalization across datasets, retrievers, and input lengths compared with strong baselines.
Towards Knowledge Checking in Retrieval-augmented Generation: A Representation Perspective (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have shown that LLMs struggle to identify the boundaries of their own knowledge and tend to prioritize external information over internal knowledge learned during pre-training.
Approach: They conduct a comprehensive analysis of LLM representation behaviors and demonstrate the significance of using representations in knowledge checking.
Outcome: The proposed classifiers improve performance even when dealing with noisy knowledge databases.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations