Papers by Siliang Xu
RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a main technique for alleviating hallucinations in large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate RAG into large language models to analyze word-level hallucinations using a corpus of 18,000 naturally generated responses from diverse LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can fine tune a relatively small LLM and achieve a competitive hallucination detection performance when compared to the existing prompt-based approaches. |
VeraCT Scan: Retrieval-Augmented Fake News Detection with Justifiable Reasoning (2024.acl-demos)
Copied to clipboard
Cheng Niu, Yang Guan, Yuanhao Wu, Juno Zhu, Juntong Song, Randy Zhong, Kaihua Zhu, Siliang Xu, Shizhe Diao, Tong Zhang
| Challenge: | generative artificial intelligence has exacerbated the challenge of distinguishing genuine news from fabricated stories. |
| Approach: | They propose a retrieval-augmented system that extracts the core facts from a given piece of news and conducts an internet-wide search to identify corroborating or conflicting reports. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system has demonstrated state-of-the-art accuracy in the realm of fake news detection. |
Mask the Correct Tokens: An Embarrassingly Simple Approach for Error Correction (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Text error correction methods usually use the source (incorrect) sentence as encoder input and generate the target (correct) sentences through the decoder. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to correct errors in text sequences by randomly masking out the correct tokens in the source sentence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves accuracy on Mandarin and English datasets with autoregressive and non-autoregressive generation models. |
Feeding What You Need by Understanding What You Learned (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research on machine reading comprehension rely heavily on large-size models and corpus to improve performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that assesses model capabilities in an explainable and multi-dimensional manner. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves an 11.22% / 8.71% improvement of EM / F1 on MRC tasks. |