Reward Difference Optimization For Sample Reweighting In Offline RLHF (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming more capable, but their maximum likelihood objective for the next token prediction falls short in capturing such crucial human values. |
| Approach: | They propose a reward difference prediction method that uses reward difference coefficients to reweigh sample pairs in offline RLHF and a difference model that considers rich interactions between a pair of responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is effective in both automatic metrics and human evaluation. |
Similar Papers
Improving Discriminative Capability of Reward Models in RLHF Using Contrastive Learning (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Lu Chen, Rui Zheng, Binghai Wang, Senjie Jin, Caishuang Huang, Junjie Ye, Zhihao Zhang, Yuhao Zhou, Zhiheng Xi, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Current methods rely on ranking losses to teach reward model to assess preferences, but they are susceptible to noise and ambiguous data, often failing to deeply understand human intentions. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that incorporates contrastive learning into the reward modeling process to enhance generalization and stabilize the reinforcement learning training process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method enhances generalization of the reward model, stabilizes the reinforcement learning training process, and improves the final alignment with human preferences. |
Optimizing Language Models with Fair and Stable Reward Composition in Reinforcement Learning (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research has developed algorithms for reinforcement learning from human feedback and AI-generated feedback. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for reinforcement learning from human feedback and AI-generated feedback that incorporates weighting, ranking, and constraining to handle disparate rewards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces disparity and enhances stability among rewards . empirical results show that the proposed method is efficient and straightforward . |
Towards Reward Fairness in RLHF: From a Resource Allocation Perspective (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | if rewards are imperfect, they can adversely affect the alignment of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a bias-agnostic method to address the issue of reward unfairness from a resource allocation perspective without specifically designing for each type of bias . they apply methods Fairness Regularization and Fairness Coefficient to achieve fairness in rewards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves fairness in rewards while minimizing biases . it can be applied to verification and reinforcement learning scenarios . |
Not All Voices Are Rewarded Equally: Probing and Repairing Reward Models across Human Diversity (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Zihao Li, Feihao Fang, Xitong Zhang, Jiaru Zou, Zhining Liu, Wei Xiong, Ziwei Wu, Baoyu Jing, Jingrui He
| Challenge: | Using real-world datasets, we conduct the most comprehensive study to date, auditing various state-of-the-art reward models across nine sensitive attributes, including age, gender, ethnicity, etc. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to mitigate group disparities in reward modeling by using real-world data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is based on a population-based dataset with nine demographic attributes, including gender, ethnicity, age, gender, and ethnicity. |
LIRE: listwise reward enhancement for preference alignment (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | prevailing approaches to preference alignment focus on pairwise comparisons, with limited exploration into multi-response scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a listwise reward enhancement approach that integrates offline rewards of multiple responses into a streamlined listwise framework. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms existing methods on dialogue and summarization tasks with good transferability to out-of-distribution data. |
Towards Pareto-Efficient RLHF: Paying Attention to a Few High-Reward Samples with Reward Dropout (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | RLHF is a bi-objective problem that has the nature of a Pareto optimization . reward dropout is generalizable and most effective with non-pretrained target models . |
| Approach: | They propose a method that guarantees a Pareto improvement by leveraging reinforcement learning to fine-tune language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method guarantees a Pareto improvement on two benchmark datasets . it is generalizable and most effective with non-pretrained target models, saving the effort of pretraining. |
Beyond Excess and Deficiency: Adaptive Length Bias Mitigation in Reward Models for RLHF (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing efforts to mitigate length bias in reward models have decreased accuracy . achieving an automatic proxy that perfectly replicates human judgment is challenging in practice. |
| Approach: | They propose an adaptive approach that dynamically adjusts the influence of response length in reward evaluations according to the context of the query. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach reduces unnecessary verbosity while improving overall response quality. |
RED: Unleashing Token-Level Rewards from Holistic Feedback via Reward Redistribution (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our approach to aligning large language models with human preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that evaluates and assigns specific credit to each token using an off-the-shelf reward model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method evaluates and assigns specific credit to each token using an off-the-shelf reward model. |
APLOT: Robust Reward Modeling via Adaptive Preference Learning with Optimal Transport (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that RLHF improves performance of Large Language Models . BT-based RMs struggle to distinguish between similar preference responses . |
| Approach: | They propose to enhance BT-based reward models by using an adaptive margin mechanism . they use semantic similarity and reward-predicted reward differences to adjust focus . |
| Outcome: | Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms existing methods in both in-distribution and OOD settings. |
Reward Modeling Requires Automatic Adjustment Based on Data Quality (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Binghai Wang, Rui Zheng, Lu Chen, Zhiheng Xi, Wei Shen, Yuhao Zhou, Dong Yan, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a method for aligning language models with human values. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that automatically adjusts reward modeling based on data quality . they use preference data to train a reward model that is more aligned with human values . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method stabilizes reward model training and significantly improves alignment performance on human preference datasets. |