Not All Voices Are Rewarded Equally: Probing and Repairing Reward Models across Human Diversity (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Zihao Li, Feihao Fang, Xitong Zhang, Jiaru Zou, Zhining Liu, Wei Xiong, Ziwei Wu, Baoyu Jing, Jingrui He
| Challenge: | Using real-world datasets, we conduct the most comprehensive study to date, auditing various state-of-the-art reward models across nine sensitive attributes, including age, gender, ethnicity, etc. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to mitigate group disparities in reward modeling by using real-world data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is based on a population-based dataset with nine demographic attributes, including gender, ethnicity, age, gender, and ethnicity. |
Similar Papers
On Diversified Preferences of Large Language Model Alignment (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) can be fine tuned with human feedback, but human preferences can be diversified due to annotators’ different tastes, which hinders the effectiveness of LLM alignment methods. |
| Approach: | They propose a calibration error metric to evaluate large language models (LLMs) and a multi-objective reward learning method to enhance the calibration performance of RMs on shared preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be adopted as a key calibration error and MORE can achieve superior alignment performance. |
Rejected Dialects: Biases Against African American Language in Reward Models (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Preference alignment via reward models can introduce new biases, hindering reward models’ fairness and equity. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for evaluating dialect biases in reward models and conduct a case study on biase . they compare reward models' preferences and behavior on paired White Mainstream English and machine-translated and human-written AAL corpora. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates dialect biases in reward models and compares them with paired White Mainstream English (WME) and machine-translated and human-written AAL corpora. |
Don’t Forget Your Reward Values: Language Model Alignment via Value-based Calibration (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating large language models have been criticized for their complexity and instability. |
| Approach: | They propose a value-based calibration method to better align Large Language Models with human preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method surpasses existing methods on AI assistant and summarization datasets, providing impressive generalizability, robustness, and diversity in different settings. |
Optimizing Language Models with Fair and Stable Reward Composition in Reinforcement Learning (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research has developed algorithms for reinforcement learning from human feedback and AI-generated feedback. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for reinforcement learning from human feedback and AI-generated feedback that incorporates weighting, ranking, and constraining to handle disparate rewards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces disparity and enhances stability among rewards . empirical results show that the proposed method is efficient and straightforward . |
Towards Reward Fairness in RLHF: From a Resource Allocation Perspective (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | if rewards are imperfect, they can adversely affect the alignment of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a bias-agnostic method to address the issue of reward unfairness from a resource allocation perspective without specifically designing for each type of bias . they apply methods Fairness Regularization and Fairness Coefficient to achieve fairness in rewards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves fairness in rewards while minimizing biases . it can be applied to verification and reinforcement learning scenarios . |
Reward Model Perspectives: Whose Opinions Do Reward Models Reward? (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that reward models are poorly aligned with demographic groups and can reward harmful stereotypes. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for measuring the alignment of opinions captured by RMs . they also investigate the extent to which RM's demonstrate sociodemographic biases a . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework measures the alignment of opinions captured by RMs . it shows that RM models are poorly aligned with several demographic groups . the findings highlight the need for more careful consideration of RM behavior in model alignment . |
A Comprehensive Survey on Learning from Rewards for Large Language Models: Reward Models and Learning Strategies (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent developments in Large Language Models have shifted from pre-training to post-training and test-time scaling. |
| Approach: | They present a comprehensive overview of learning from rewards from the perspective of reward models and learning strategies across training, inference, and post-inference stages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed paradigm enables the transition from passive learning from static data to active learning from dynamic feedback. |
The Accuracy Paradox in RLHF: When Better Reward Models Don’t Yield Better Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) significantly enhances Natural Language Processing by aligning language models with human expectations. |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate feedback from humans into RLHF to improve language models by capturing human-like preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms models trained with moderately accurate reward models on relevance, factuality, and completeness tasks. |
Reward Difference Optimization For Sample Reweighting In Offline RLHF (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming more capable, but their maximum likelihood objective for the next token prediction falls short in capturing such crucial human values. |
| Approach: | They propose a reward difference prediction method that uses reward difference coefficients to reweigh sample pairs in offline RLHF and a difference model that considers rich interactions between a pair of responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is effective in both automatic metrics and human evaluation. |
The Generation Gap: Exploring Age Bias in the Value Systems of Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using the World Value Survey, we find a general inclination of LLM values towards younger demographics, especially when compared to the US population. |
| Approach: | They use data from the World Value Survey to examine the alignment of LLM values with specific age groups. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to predict the value of a large language model and to assess its performance on 13 categories. |