Optimizing Language Models with Fair and Stable Reward Composition in Reinforcement Learning (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research has developed algorithms for reinforcement learning from human feedback and AI-generated feedback. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for reinforcement learning from human feedback and AI-generated feedback that incorporates weighting, ranking, and constraining to handle disparate rewards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces disparity and enhances stability among rewards . empirical results show that the proposed method is efficient and straightforward . |
Similar Papers
Towards Reward Fairness in RLHF: From a Resource Allocation Perspective (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | if rewards are imperfect, they can adversely affect the alignment of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a bias-agnostic method to address the issue of reward unfairness from a resource allocation perspective without specifically designing for each type of bias . they apply methods Fairness Regularization and Fairness Coefficient to achieve fairness in rewards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves fairness in rewards while minimizing biases . it can be applied to verification and reinforcement learning scenarios . |
Prototypical Reward Network for Data-Efficient Model Alignment (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a reward model that fine-tunes Large Language Models (LLMs) by utilizing Prototypical Networks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework utilizing Prototypical Networks to enhance reward models under limited human feedback, enabling more stable and reliable structural learning from fewer samples. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves reward models under limited human feedback, surpassing traditional methods, especially in data-limited scenarios. |
Not All Voices Are Rewarded Equally: Probing and Repairing Reward Models across Human Diversity (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Zihao Li, Feihao Fang, Xitong Zhang, Jiaru Zou, Zhining Liu, Wei Xiong, Ziwei Wu, Baoyu Jing, Jingrui He
| Challenge: | Using real-world datasets, we conduct the most comprehensive study to date, auditing various state-of-the-art reward models across nine sensitive attributes, including age, gender, ethnicity, etc. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to mitigate group disparities in reward modeling by using real-world data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is based on a population-based dataset with nine demographic attributes, including gender, ethnicity, age, gender, and ethnicity. |
RED: Unleashing Token-Level Rewards from Holistic Feedback via Reward Redistribution (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our approach to aligning large language models with human preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that evaluates and assigns specific credit to each token using an off-the-shelf reward model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method evaluates and assigns specific credit to each token using an off-the-shelf reward model. |
Don’t Forget Your Reward Values: Language Model Alignment via Value-based Calibration (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating large language models have been criticized for their complexity and instability. |
| Approach: | They propose a value-based calibration method to better align Large Language Models with human preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method surpasses existing methods on AI assistant and summarization datasets, providing impressive generalizability, robustness, and diversity in different settings. |
Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Dense Rewards from Language Model Critic (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning (RL) can align language models with non-differentiable reward signals, such as human preferences, but the sparsity of these signals can lead to inefficient and unstable learning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that utilizes the critique capability of Large Language Models to produce intermediate-step rewards during RL training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves sample efficiency and the overall performance of the policy model, supported by both automatic and human evaluation. |
Dynamic Reward Adjustment in Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning for Counselor Reflection Generation (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this paper, we analyze the problem of multi-reward reinforcement learning to optimize for multiple text qualities for natural language generation. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multi-reward reinforcement learning to optimize for multiple text qualities for natural language generation by using bandits. |
| Outcome: | The proposed techniques outperform existing naive and bandit baselines, showcasing their potential for enhancing language models. |
Reward Difference Optimization For Sample Reweighting In Offline RLHF (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming more capable, but their maximum likelihood objective for the next token prediction falls short in capturing such crucial human values. |
| Approach: | They propose a reward difference prediction method that uses reward difference coefficients to reweigh sample pairs in offline RLHF and a difference model that considers rich interactions between a pair of responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is effective in both automatic metrics and human evaluation. |
The Accuracy Paradox in RLHF: When Better Reward Models Don’t Yield Better Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) significantly enhances Natural Language Processing by aligning language models with human expectations. |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate feedback from humans into RLHF to improve language models by capturing human-like preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms models trained with moderately accurate reward models on relevance, factuality, and completeness tasks. |
Navigating Noisy Feedback: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Error-Prone Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Muhan Lin, Shuyang Shi, Yue Guo, Behdad Chalaki, Vaishnav Tadiparthi, Ehsan Moradi Pari, Simon Stepputtis, Joseph Campbell, Katia Sycara
| Challenge: | Reward hacking is a problem in reinforcement learning where the ability to specify the desired behavior of a reward function is difficult. |
| Approach: | They propose to use feedback as a potential-based shaping function to solicit and apply feedback from large language models to improve convergence speed and policy returns. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves convergence speed and policy returns over baselines even with significant ranking errors and eliminates the need for complex post-processing of reward functions. |