Filtered Direct Preference Optimization (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on the impact of RLHF on text quality have focused on reward-model-free RL.
Approach: They propose an extension of direct preference optimization to improve model performance by analyzing the quality of the preference dataset.
Outcome: The proposed method improves the performance of models optimized with DPO over those optimized with reward-model-based RLHF.

Similar Papers

Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) exploits biases in human preferences, such as verbosity, and is under-explored for Direct Alignment Algorithms such as DPO.
Approach: They propose to exploit verbosity biases in RLHF by using direct preference optimization to fine-tune models.
Outcome: The proposed approach achieves 20% improvement in win rates when controlling for length on summarization and dialogue datasets, despite the GPT4 judge’s verbosity bias.
Reward Modeling Requires Automatic Adjustment Based on Data Quality (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a method for aligning language models with human values.
Approach: They propose a method that automatically adjusts reward modeling based on data quality . they use preference data to train a reward model that is more aligned with human values .
Outcome: The proposed method stabilizes reward model training and significantly improves alignment performance on human preference datasets.
RS-DPO: A Hybrid Rejection Sampling and Direct Preference Optimization Method for Alignment of Large Language Models (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) is widely employed to align large language models with user intent.
Approach: They propose to combine rejection sampling and direct preference optimization to improve alignment with user intent by identifying pairs of contrastive samples from human annotator and alternative LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms existing methods including RS, PPO, and DPO in a limited resource environment.
Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have focused on replacing the reward model in Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) methods for Large Language Models (LLMs).
Approach: They propose a self-supervised preference optimization framework that replaces the reward model with a preference loss and alignment loss to improve LLMs' ability to understand human preferences.
Outcome: The proposed framework can be integrated with existing preference optimization methods and significantly boost their performance.
On the Limited Generalization Capability of the Implicit Reward Model Induced by Direct Preference Optimization (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is an effective approach for aligning language models to human preferences.
Approach: They compare the accuracy of DPORM and EXRM with a reward function for scoring human preferences.
Outcome: The proposed methods can approximate an EXRM on the limit infinite samples, but it is unclear how effective they are in practice.
CRPO: Confidence-Reward Driven Preference Optimization for Machine Translation (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential in natural language processing tasks, but their application to machine translation remains challenging due to pretraining on predominantly English-centric datasets.
Approach: They propose a method that combines reward scores with model confidence to improve model selection for fine-tuning.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms existing methods in translation accuracy and data efficiency.
Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Direct preference optimization (DPO) fine-tunes language models with human preferences . but not all preference pairs are equal; sometimes, the preferred response is only slightly better than the dispreferred one.
Approach: They propose a generalization of direct preference optimization that does not treat every preference pair equally during fine-tuning.
Outcome: The proposed algorithm outperforms DPO on tasks with limited preference pairs . it requires the difference between likelihood of preferred and dispreferred response to be greater than offset value .
WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Off-policy preference optimization suffers from a distributional gap between the policy used for data collection and the target policy, leading to suboptimal optimization.
Approach: They propose a method to simulate on-policy learning with off-police preference data.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) by up to 5.6% on Alpaca Eval 2 and MT-bench.
Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent approaches to language model alignment assume homogeneous human preferences, but actual human preferences vary widely and are hard to satisfy with a single language model.
Approach: They propose an RL-free extension of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) that folds language modeling directly into reward modeling and trains language models as collective reward models that combine all objectives with specific weights.
Outcome: The proposed method matches or outperforms existing methods in safety alignment and long-form question answering.
Fine-Tuning Language Models with Reward Learning on Policy (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is an effective approach to align large language models (LLMs) to human preferences.
Approach: They propose a framework that refines a reward model using policy samples to keep it on-distribution.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms the state-of-the-art on three benchmark datasets showing that it can learn robust representations of policy samples.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations