Papers with ChartQA

13 papers
VisDoT : Enhancing Visual Reasoning through Human-Like Interpretation Grounding and Decomposition of Thought (2026.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Lack of perceptual grounding limits vision-language models' ability to interpret visual data . prior work on visualized data understanding focused on adapting VLMs to instruction tuning and chain-of-thought supervision .
Approach: They propose a framework that enhances visual reasoning through human-like interpretation grounding.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves on ChartQA and ChartQAPro benchmarks by +11.2%.
Chart-based Reasoning: Transferring Capabilities from LLMs to VLMs (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Visual language models (VLMs) are achieving increasingly strong performance on multimodal tasks.
Approach: They propose to transfer reasoning capabilities from large-language models to VLMs by constructing a 20x larger dataset and a larger dataset to improve general reasoning capabilities.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms larger models without an upstream OCR system while keeping inference time constant.
Enhanced Chart Understanding via Visual Language Pre-training on Plot Table Pairs (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to understand chart plots are difficult to apply to visual-language tasks.
Approach: They propose a V+L model that learns how to interpret table information from chart images via cross-modal pre-training on plot table pairs.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art models on the chartQA benchmark by over 8% performance gains.
TinyChart: Efficient Chart Understanding with Program-of-Thoughts Learning and Visual Token Merging (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have shown that multimodal large language models can be useful for chart understanding, but their size limits their use in resource-constrained environments.
Approach: They propose an efficient multimodal large language model with only 3B parameters for chart understanding.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms several chart-understanding MLLMs with up to 13B parameters on ChartQA, Chart-to-Text, Chart to Table, OpenCQA, and ChartX.
Plot Twist: Multimodal Models Don’t Comprehend Simple Chart Details (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in multimodal models show remarkable performance in real-world benchmarks for chart and figure understanding like ChartQA that involve interpreting trends, comparing data points, and extracting insights from visuals.
Approach: They propose to ask models basic questions about axes ranges and values to examine their visual understanding abilities in the context of charts.
Outcome: The models perform well on complex tasks, but lack basic capabilities on basic questions.
Charting the Future: Using Chart Question-Answering for Scalable Evaluation of LLM-Driven Data Visualizations (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation methods rely on human judgment to assess data accuracy and visual communication, which is costly and unscalable.
Approach: They propose a framework that leverages Visual Question Answering (VQA) models to automate the evaluation of LLM-generated data visualizations.
Outcome: The proposed framework assesses data representation quality and communicative clarity of charts using two leading VQA benchmark datasets, ChartQA and PlotQA, with visualizations generated by OpenAI’s GPT-3.5 Turbo and Meta’s Llama 3.1 70B-Instruct models.
Self-play through Computational Runtimes improves Chart Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve impressive zero-shot performance on multimodal reasoning tasks.
Approach: They propose a self-play programming interface which leverages visual reasoning models to generate code to decompose a complex visual reasoning task in sub-tasks and use it as a tool to solve decomposed tasks.
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms baselines on difficult chart reasoning benchmarks.
MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scale (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current instruction-tuning datasets focus on simplistic visual question answering tasks, and provide phrase-level answers without any intermediate rationales.
Approach: They propose to use open-source multimodal large language models to train MLLMs on a dataset with 12M instruction-response pairs to elicit CoT reasoning.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance on benchmarks such as MathVerse, MMMU-Pro, and MuirBench, and gains improvements of up to 4% on non-reasoning-based benchmarks.
ChartInsights: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models for Low-Level Chart Question Answering (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Chart question answering (ChartQA) tasks are a critical part of visualization charts.
Approach: They propose a chart question answering task that uses MLLMs to analyze charts . they propose 'Chain-of-Charts' textual prompt strategy that directs attention to visual elements .
Outcome: The proposed model improves performance by 14.41% and 80% in low-level ChartQA tasks.
MatCha: Enhancing Visual Language Pretraining with Math Reasoning and Chart Derendering (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Visual language models that are pretraining on natural images or image-text pairs crawled from the web perform poorly on visual language tasks such as ChartQA and ChartQA.
Approach: They propose to perform several pretraining tasks that cover plot deconstruction and numerical reasoning which are key capabilities in visual language modeling.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art methods on benchmarks such as PlotQA and ChartQA by as much as 20%.
ChartQAPro: A More Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Chart Question Answering (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Chart Question Answering systems are limited in their ability to interpret data visually and reason with visual representations.
Approach: They propose a chart-based chart question-answering system that includes 1,341 charts from 99 diverse sources and 1,948 questions in various types.
Outcome: The new benchmark includes 1,341 charts from 99 diverse sources and 1,948 questions in various types.
WildDoc: How Far Are We from Achieving Comprehensive and Robust Document Understanding in the Wild? (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for document understanding in the wild are based on scanned or digital documents . however, these benchmarks fail to capture the challenges posed by documents in the real world .
Approach: They propose a new benchmark that incorporates a diverse set of manually captured document images reflecting real-world conditions.
Outcome: The proposed model is based on a set of manually captured document images reflecting real-world conditions and is compared with digital or scanned documents.
When Big Models Train Small Ones: Label-Free Model Parity Alignment for Efficient Visual Question Answering using Small VLMs (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large vision and language models have demonstrated remarkable performance in visual question answering tasks.
Approach: They introduce a framework to optimize L-VLMs by leveraging unlabeled images . they conduct extensive experiments on four diverse VQA benchmarks .
Outcome: The proposed framework improves L-VLMs on four visual question answering benchmarks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations