Papers with BLI
Bilingual Lexicon Induction with Semi-supervision in Non-Isometric Embedding Spaces (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on bilingual lexicon induction (BLI) relies on an assumption about the isometry of two embedding spaces. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-supervised approach that relaxes the isometric assumption while leveraging limited aligned bilingual lexicons and a larger set of unaligned word embeddings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method obtains state-of-the-art results on 15 of 18 language pairs on the MUSE dataset and does particularly well when the embedding spaces don’t appear isometric. |
An Analysis of Euclidean vs. Graph-Based Framing for Bilingual Lexicon Induction from Word Embedding Spaces (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Kelly Marchisio, Youngser Park, Ali Saad-Eldin, Anton Alyakin, Kevin Duh, Carey Priebe, Philipp Koehn
| Challenge: | Existing work in bilingual lexicon induction views word embeddings as vectors in Euclidean space. |
| Approach: | They propose to use word embeddings as nodes in a weighted graph to examine a node’s graph neighborhood without assuming a linear transform. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approaches are compared under different data conditions and show that they complement each other when combined. |
Self-Augmented In-Context Learning for Unsupervised Word Translation (2024.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have strong word translation or bilingual lexicon induction (BLI) capabilities in few-shot setups, but they cannot match the performance of ‘traditional’ mapping-based approaches in the unsupervised scenario where no seed translation pairs are available. |
| Approach: | They propose a self-augmented in-context learning method that iteratively induces a set of high-confidence word translation pairs for in-constext learning from an LLM and reapplies them to the same LLM in the ICL fashion. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows substantial gains over zero-shot prompting of LLMs on two established benchmarks, outperforming mapping-based baselines across the board. |
How to (Properly) Evaluate Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings: On Strong Baselines, Comparative Analyses, and Some Misconceptions (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Cross-lingual word embeddings (CLEs) are used for downstream NLP tasks . CLEs are based on bilingual lexicon induction (BLI) evaluations vary greatly, hindering ability to interpret performance and properties of different CLE models. |
| Approach: | They evaluate CLE models for a large number of language pairs on bilingual lexicon induction and three downstream tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performance is based on supervised and unsupervised models on bilingual lexicon induction and three downstream tasks. |
DM-BLI: Dynamic Multiple Subspaces Alignment for Unsupervised Bilingual Lexicon Induction (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to unsupervised bilingual lexicon induction (BLI) fail on distant or low-resource language pairs, achieving less than half the performance observed in rich-resourced languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for unsupervised bilingual lexicon induction that uses multiple subspace alignments instead of a single mapping. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on 12 language pairs show that the proposed framework improves language alignment by utilizing multiple subspace alignments instead of a single mapping. |
Word-level Cross-lingual Structure in Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across a broad spectrum of cross-lingual Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Word-level Cross-lingual Structure to prove that the word-level embedding on the hidden layers isomorphic between languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves on two representative LLM foundations, LLaMA2 and BLOOM. |
Probing Cross-Lingual Lexical Knowledge from Multilingual Sentence Encoders (2023.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pretrained multilingual language models (LMs) can be 'rewired' into effective multilingual sentence encoders (SEs) however, it remains unclear how to best leverage them to represent sub-sentence lexical items in cross-lingual lexicals. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for exposing cross-lingual lexical knowledge by additional fine-tuning through inexpensive contrastive learning that requires only a small amount of word translation pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method exposes cross-lingual lexical knowledge by additional fine-tuning through inexpensive contrastive learning that requires only a small amount of word translation pairs. |
The Secret is in the Spectra: Predicting Cross-lingual Task Performance with Spectral Similarity Measures (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have suggested that bilingual lexicon induction is influenced by the (dis)similarity of the languages at hand. |
| Approach: | They propose to measure the isomorphism of monolingual embedding spaces based on their spectra and introduce isometric measures to measure their similarity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed measures outperform standard isomorphism measures while being more tractable and easier to interpret. |
Learning Unsupervised Multilingual Word Embeddings with Incremental Multilingual Hubs (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research has found that a shared bilingual word embedding space can be induced by projecting monolingual word embeds from two languages without any bilingual supervision. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for learning unsupervised multilingual word embeddings that mitigates instability issues for distant language pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on two downstream tasks outperforming even supervised baselines. |
Why Overfitting Isn’t Always Bad: Retrofitting Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings to Dictionaries (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies only evaluate cross-lingual word embeddings on bilingual lexicon induction (BLI) however, underfitting can hinder generalization to other downstream tasks. |
| Approach: | They retrofit cross-lingual word embeddings to the training dictionary and a synthetic dictionary to improve their results. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves accuracy on two downstream tasks, despite underfitting the training dictionary. |
LNMap: Departures from Isomorphic Assumption in Bilingual Lexicon Induction Through Non-Linear Mapping in Latent Space (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for bilingual lexicon induction are mapping-based, but they do not hold for closely related languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-supervised method to learn cross-lingual word embeddings for BLI using a linear mapping function and a latent space of two independently trained autoencoders. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing models on 15 different language pairs on both directions. |
Semi-Supervised Bilingual Lexicon Induction with Two-way Interaction (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing semisupervised methods do not fully utilize the knowledge hidden in annotated and nonannotated data, which hinders further improvement of their performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-supervised BLI framework to encourage interaction between supervised signal and unsupervised alignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can incorporate any supervised and unsupervised BLI methods based on optimal transport and bi-directional lexicon update. |
Morphologically Aware Word-Level Translation (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current approaches to bilingual lexicon induction (BLI) ignore inflectional morphology . current models degrade when translating less frequent inflected forms . |
| Approach: | They propose a morphologically aware probability model that models lexeme translation and inflectional morphology in a structured way. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves performance across 6 language pairs and in the weakly supervised setting. |
Combining Static Word Embeddings and Contextual Representations for Bilingual Lexicon Induction (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Bilingual Lexicon Induction (BLI) aims to map words in one language to their translations in another. |
| Approach: | They propose a mechanism to combine static word embeddings and contextual representations to utilize the advantages of both paradigms. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves performance on supervised and unsupervised BLI benchmarks on all language pairs by average improving 3.2 points over baselines. |
How Lexical is Bilingual Lexicon Induction? (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | lexical variation and low-resource settings make it difficult to learn in low-level settings. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate additional lexical information into the retrieve-and-rank approach to improve lexicon induction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves on XLING by an average of 2% across all language pairs. |
Improving Word Translation via Two-Stage Contrastive Learning (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to bilingual lexicon induction (BLI) are limited to two stages, but we propose a robust and effective two-stage contrastive learning framework for the task. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage contrastive learning framework for the task . they propose to refine cross-lingual linear maps between static word embeddings via a contrastive objective and integrate it into the self-learning procedure for even more refined cross-linguistic maps. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves cross-lingual maps and word translation capability by integrating it into the self-learning procedure. |
Improving Bilingual Lexicon Induction with Cross-Encoder Reranking (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current methods for bilingual lexicon induction rely on the induction of cross-lingual word embeddings (CLWEs) such as VecMap or mPLMs are not available for multilingual NLP. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-supervised post-hoc reranking method which combines cross-lingual lexical knowledge from multilingual pretrained language models with original CLWEs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods on two standard benchmarks spanning a wide spectrum of languages and is robust to different CLWEs. |
Hubless Nearest Neighbor Search for Bilingual Lexicon Induction (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for bilingual Lexicon Induction use nonparallel corpora, but hubness often degrades accuracy. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to create a lexicon of translation equivalents from non-parallel corpora by aligning two word embedding spaces and retrieving the nearest neighbor (NN) this method reduces hubness, which is necessary for retrieval tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms NN, Inverted SoFtmax and other state-of-the-art methods. |
Do We Really Need Fully Unsupervised Cross-Lingual Embeddings? (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a series of bilingual lexicon induction experiments with 15 diverse languages (210 language pairs) show that fully unsupervised CLWE methods fail for a large number of language pairs. |
| Approach: | They propose to use fully unsupervised approaches to project monolingual embeddings into a shared cross-lingual space without any cross-linguistic signal. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods fail for a large number of language pairs, but never surpass weakly supervised methods. |
Improving Zero-Shot Cross-lingual Transfer for Multilingual Question Answering over Knowledge Graph (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to solve multilingual question answering over knowledge graph (KGQA) use of bilingual lexicon induction to map training questions into those in target language circumvents language inconsistency . |
| Approach: | They propose to use bilingual lexicon induction to map training questions in source and target languages as augmented training data to minimize syntax-disorder. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model narrows the gap in zero-shot cross-lingual transfer between source and target languages. |
On Bilingual Lexicon Induction with Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to induction bilingual lexicons still require cross-lingual word representations . a recent study shows that few-shot prompting with in-context examples from nearest neighbours achieves the best performance . |
| Approach: | They examine whether it is possible to prompt and fine-tune multilingual LLMs for BLI . they experiment with 18 open-source text-to-text mLLMs of different sizes . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach is compared with existing approaches on two standard BLI benchmarks covering a range of typologically diverse languages. |
A Structure-Aware Generative Adversarial Network for Bilingual Lexicon Induction (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Bilingual lexicon induction (BLI) is the task of inducing word translations with a learned mapping function that aligns monolingual word embedding spaces in two different languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that explicitly captures multiple topological structure information to achieve accurate bilingual lexicon induction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model captures multiple topological structure information to achieve accurate BLI on a public dataset. |
When Your Cousin Has the Right Connections: Unsupervised Bilingual Lexicon Induction for Related Data-Imbalanced Languages (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for unsupervised bilingual lexicon induction depend on good quality static or contextual embeddings for both languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for unsupervised bilingual lexicon induction between a related LRL and a high-resource language that only requires inference on a masked language model of the HRL. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method performs well on low-resource languages with 5M tokens against Hindi . it is compared with existing methods on (mid-resourced) Marathi and Nepali . |