Papers by Zikang Huang
Evaluating the Expressive Appropriateness of Speech in Rich Contexts (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Tianrui Wang, Ziyang Ma, Yizhou Peng, Haoyu Wang, Zhikang Niu, Zikang Huang, Yihao Wu, Yi-Wen Chao, Yu Jiang, Yuheng Lu, Guanrou Yang, Xuanchen Li, Hexin Liu, Chunyu Qiang, Cheng Gong, Yifan Yang, Tianchi Liu, Junyu Wang, Nana Hou, Meng Ge, Fuming You, Yang Wei, Zhongqian Sun, Hu Haifeng, Xiaobao Wang, Eng Siong Chng, Xie Chen, Longbiao Wang, Jianwu Dang
| Challenge: | Existing methods for evaluating expressive speech focus on word accuracy, naturalness, signal quality, or emotional intensity at the utterance level. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for Evaluating Expressive Appropriateness in speech that assesses whether a speech sample aligns with the underlying communicative intent implied by its discourse-level narrative context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing speech evaluation and analysis systems on a human-annotated test set. |
HoWToBench: Holistic Evaluation for LLM’s Capability in Human-level Writing using Tree of Writing (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Andrew Zhuoer Feng, Cunxiang Wang, Yu Luo, Lin Fan, Irene Zhou, Zikang Wang, Xiaotao Gu, Jie Tang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Evaluating the writing capabilities of large language models remains a significant challenge due to the multidimensional nature of writing skills and the limitations of existing metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose to model the aggregation weights of sub-features in a tree-structured workflow and propose a Chinese writing benchmark that mitigates biases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed tree-of-writing (ToW) measures the writing capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in Chinese and shows that it mitigates biases and achieves a *0.93* Pearson correlation with human judgments. |