Challenge: Existing methods for evaluating expressive speech focus on word accuracy, naturalness, signal quality, or emotional intensity at the utterance level.
Approach: They propose a framework for Evaluating Expressive Appropriateness in speech that assesses whether a speech sample aligns with the underlying communicative intent implied by its discourse-level narrative context.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms existing speech evaluation and analysis systems on a human-annotated test set.

Similar Papers

Beyond Sentence-level Labels: Integrating Conversational Context and Personal Experience for Natural Emotional Expression (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing systems rely on sentence-level labels, which fails to capture the subtle nuances of human affect.
Approach: They propose to use a large-scale, context-aware speech corpus derived from multi-speaker audiobooks to generate a speech that is human-like.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing methods in terms of emotional expression accuracy and naturalness.
Computational Narrative Understanding for Expressive Text-to-Speech (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in text-to-speech systems have been driven by large, multi-domain speech corpora.
Approach: They propose a large-scale 5.3K hours of expressive speech drawn from character quotations . they fine-tune a flow-matching model and train from scratch .
Outcome: The proposed model improves expressivity and intelligibility while training from scratch improves expressiveness of an autoregressive model.
SpeechLLM-as-Judges: Towards General and Interpretable Speech Quality Evaluation (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for evaluating the perceptual quality of synthetic speech are limited due to the complexity of perceptual quality factors and the diversity of speech generation tasks.
Approach: They propose a new paradigm for enabling large language models to conduct structured speech quality evaluation using a large-scale dataset.
Outcome: The proposed model performs well across tasks and languages.
Measuring What Matters!! Assessing Therapeutic Principles in Mental-Health Conversation (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent systems exhibit conversational competence but lack structured mechanisms to evaluate adherence to core therapeutic principles.
Approach: They propose a framework to evaluate therapist-like responses for clinically grounded appropriateness and effectiveness using an ordinal scale.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves an F-1 score of 63.34 versus the baseline Qwen3 score of 38.56 .
Rethinking the Evaluation for Conversational Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation protocols for large language models (LLMs) are inadequate for conversational recommender systems.
Approach: They propose an evaluation approach based on LLMs that harnesses LLM-based user simulators to evaluate ChatGPT's performance.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation approach can simulate various system-user interaction scenarios.
On the Fallacy of Global Token Perplexity in Spoken Language Model Evaluation (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Generative spoken language models are often evaluated using global token perplexity, which overlooks fundamental differences between speech and text modalities.
Approach: They propose a variety of likelihood- and generative-based evaluation methods that serve in place of naive global token perplexity.
Outcome: The proposed evaluations more faithfully reflect perceived generation quality, as evidenced by stronger correlations with human-rated mean opinion scores (MOS).
Beyond Length: Context-Aware Expansion and Independence as Developmentally Sensitive Evaluation in Child Utterances (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Common proxies such as Mean Length of Utterance (MLU), lexical diversity (vocd-D), and readability indices are dominated by length and ignore conversational context, missing aspects of response quality such as reasoning depth, topic maintenance, and discourse planning.
Approach: They propose a framework that classifies the Previous Adult Utterance Type and scores the child’s response along two axes: Expansion (contextual elaboration and inferential depth) and Independence (the child’ s contribution to advancing the discourse).
Outcome: The proposed framework assesses the child's response along two axes: Expansion (contextual elaboration and inferential depth) and Independence (the child’s contribution to advancing the discourse).
ConEC: Earnings Call Dataset with Real-world Contexts for Benchmarking Contextual Speech Recognition (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work on contextual speech recognition (ASR) systems focuses on recognizing words that are not frequently seen in training data, such as rare words, but word error rate on rare words remains over 20%.
Approach: They propose to use public-domain earnings calls and supplementary materials to evaluate contextual ASR approaches grounded on real-world applications.
Outcome: The proposed frameworks are noisier than artificially synthesized contexts that contain the ground truth, yet still make great room for future improvement of contextual ASR technology.
Towards Holistic and Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialogue Generation (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods of open-domain dialogue evaluation are labor-intensive and inefficient.
Approach: They propose to use open-domain dialogues to evaluate different aspects of dialogues using holistic evaluation metrics.
Outcome: The proposed metrics show strong correlations with human judgments.
Does Context Matter? ContextualJudgeBench for Evaluating LLM-based Judges in Contextual Settings (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Contextual evaluation is challenging for state-of-the-art judge models . evaluation criteria are often conditional and dependent on practitioner priorities .
Approach: They propose a judge benchmark that evaluates large language models as judges in contexts . they use human annotations and model-based perturbations to build the benchmark .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark aims to evaluate large language models in contexts with 2,000 challenging response pairs.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations