HoWToBench: Holistic Evaluation for LLM’s Capability in Human-level Writing using Tree of Writing (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Andrew Zhuoer Feng, Cunxiang Wang, Yu Luo, Lin Fan, Irene Zhou, Zikang Wang, Xiaotao Gu, Jie Tang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Evaluating the writing capabilities of large language models remains a significant challenge due to the multidimensional nature of writing skills and the limitations of existing metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose to model the aggregation weights of sub-features in a tree-structured workflow and propose a Chinese writing benchmark that mitigates biases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed tree-of-writing (ToW) measures the writing capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in Chinese and shows that it mitigates biases and achieves a *0.93* Pearson correlation with human judgments. |
Similar Papers
WebNovelBench: Placing LLM Novelists on the Web Novel Distribution (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for long-form novel generation lack scale, diversity, or objective measures. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that assesses long-form novel generation using an LLM-as-Judge approach. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework differentiates between human-written masterpieces, popular web novels, and LLM-generated content. |
Towards A “Novel” Benchmark: Evaluating Literary Fiction with Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) context windows have enabled them to process inputs over 100K tokens and generate outputs of up to 10K token. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-level evaluation framework that incorporates ten metrics across the Macro, Meso, and Micro levels and an annotated fiction dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework incorporates ten metrics across the Macro, Meso, and Micro levels and is based on a human-human-AI dataset. |
LitBench: A Benchmark and Dataset for Reliable Evaluation of Creative Writing (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a single prompt can inspire countless valid stories, making objective verification impossible. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale benchmark for creative writing evaluation using a reddit corpus and a 2,480-pair test set. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing OTS judges and generative reward models in the evaluation of creative writing. |
Exploring the Capability Boundaries of LLMs in Mastering of Chinese Chouxiang Language (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Dianqing Lin, Tian Lan, Jiali Zhu, Jiang Li, Wei Chen, Xu Liu, null Aruukhan, Xiangdong Su, Hongxu Hou, Guanglai Gao
| Challenge: | Current state-of-the-art LLMs exhibit clear limitations on multiple tasks, while performing well on tasks that involve contextual semantic understanding. |
| Approach: | They propose a mouse-based benchmark to evaluate LLMs' performance on NLP tasks involving Chouxiang Language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates the performance of LLMs on six NLP tasks involving Chouxiang Language. |
LLMCrit: Teaching Large Language Models to Use Criteria (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current research on using criteria to provide feedback on tasks is limited . a general framework that can be used to teach large language models to use criteria is lacking . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that enables large language models to use criteria for feedback . criteria are extracted from guidelines and construct in-context demonstrations for each criterion . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can be used to provide natural language feedback on tasks. |
RealHiTBench: A Comprehensive Realistic Hierarchical Table Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-Based Table Analysis (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Pengzuo Wu, Yuhang Yang, Guangcheng Zhu, Chao Ye, Hong Gu, Xu Lu, Ruixuan Xiao, Bowen Bao, Yijing He, Liangyu Zha, Wentao Ye, Junbo Zhao, Haobo Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for large language models focus on simple, flat table structures. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the performance of both Large Language Models and Multimodal LLMs across a variety of input formats for complex tabular data, including LaTeX, HTML, and PNG. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates the performance of LLMs and Multimodal LLM models across a variety of input formats for complex tabular data, including LaTeX, HTML, and PNG. |
TOWER: Tree Organized Weighting for Evaluating Complex Instructions (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Evaluating the ability of large language models to follow human-written instructions remains a challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a new evaluation metric that incorporates human-judged importance into the assessment of complex instruction following. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metric incorporates human-judged importance into the assessment of complex instruction following. |
ResearchBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Inspiration-Based Task Decomposition (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yujie Liu, Zonglin Yang, Tong Xie, Jinjie Ni, Ben Gao, Yuqiang Li, Shixiang Tang, Wanli Ouyang, Erik Cambria, Dongzhan Zhou
| Challenge: | Large language models have shown potential in assisting scientific research, yet their ability to discover high-quality research hypotheses remains unexamined due to the lack of a dedicated benchmark. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating large language models on a sufficient set of scientific discovery sub-tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework extracts critical components from papers across 12 disciplines with expert validation confirming its accuracy. |
Help Me Write a Story: Evaluating LLMs’ Ability to Generate Writing Feedback (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current models provide specific and mostly accurate writing feedback, but they fail to identify the biggest writing issue in the story and to correctly decide when to offer critical vs. positive feedback. |
| Approach: | They propose a task that corrupts 1,300 stories to intentionally introduce writing issues to study model performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well in a controlled task with human and automatic evaluation metrics. |
WaterBench: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Watermarks for Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have developed watermarking algorithms which restrict the generation process to leave an invisible trace for watermark detection. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmarking procedure that compares different methods to ensure consistent watermarking strength and jointly evaluates their generation and detection performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compares 4 open-source watermarks on 2 LLMs under 2 watermarking strengths and observes the common struggles for current methods on maintaining the generation quality. |