Papers by Zhangchen Xu

8 papers
Small Models Struggle to Learn from Strong Reasoners (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a small learning gap exists between large and small language models . long CoT data and large model responses are not beneficial for small models - a problem that may be due to the small student model's ability to handle distribution shifts.
Approach: They propose a mix distillation strategy that balances reasoning complexity by combining long and short CoT examples or reasoning from both larger and smaller models.
Outcome: The proposed strategy outperforms training on large and small models on short CoT and small model CoT.
Understanding the Language Model to Solve the Symbolic Multi-Step Reasoning Problem from the Perspective of Buffer Mechanism (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models struggle with complex reasoning tasks, such as mathematical problem-solving.
Approach: They constructed a symbolic multi-step reasoning task to investigate the information propagation mechanisms in Transformer models when solving the task through direct answering and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.
Outcome: The proposed algorithm improves on 7 multi-step reasoning datasets, while introducing only 132 trainable parameters.
Stronger Models are Not Always Stronger Teachers for Instruction Tuning (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to optimize instruction-following capabilities of large language models (LLMs) assume that larger or stronger models are stronger teachers and therefore adopt smaller models as response generators.
Approach: They propose to use large-scale instruction datasets to tune large language models to align with specific tasks and user intents.
Outcome: The proposed metric outperforms most baselines in identifying the effectiveness of response generators.
SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decoding (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Despite advances in large language models, they face substantial challenges in terms of safety.
Approach: They develop a safety-aware decoding strategy for large language models to defend against jailbreak attacks.
Outcome: The proposed strategy outperforms six defense methods against jailbreak attacks on five LLMs.
Temporal Sampling for Forgotten Reasoning in LLMs (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a new metric measures the percentage of questions that were answered incorrectly during fine-tuning .
Approach: They propose a decoding strategy that draws outputs from multiple checkpoints along the training trajectory.
Outcome: The proposed method improves reasoning performance and consistency across benchmarks.
SafeChain: Safety of Language Models with Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Emerging large reasoning models (LRMs) leverage long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to enhance their reasoning capabilities.
Approach: They conduct a systematic study of LRM safety using human annotations to assess their safety.
Outcome: The proposed safety measures are compared to state-of-the-art models on strong and wildjailbreak datasets.
KodCode: A Diverse, Challenging, and Verifiable Synthetic Dataset for Coding (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing code-focused resources typically fail to ensure either the breadth of coverage or verifiable correctness.
Approach: They propose a synthetic dataset that provides high-quality, verifiable training data for Large Language Models for coding.
Outcome: The proposed dataset surpasses Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B in performance on coding benchmarks.
CleanGen: Mitigating Backdoor Attacks for Generation Tasks in Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Generative large language models (LLMs) have remarkable performance in generation tasks, but datasets used to train or fine-tune these models are often not disclosed to users.
Approach: They develop an inference time defense called CleanGen to mitigate backdoor attacks for generation tasks in large language models.
Outcome: The proposed inference time defense achieves lower attack success rates (ASR) compared to baseline defenses for all five backdoor attacks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations