Papers by Jiachen Yu
Large Language Models are In-context Teachers for Knowledge Reasoning (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-context teaching is a method of providing in-concept example rationales to a student to reason over unseen cases. |
| Approach: | They propose to use an LLM's self-elicited explanations as in-context demonstrations to prompt a student to reason over unseen cases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms human-crafted demonstrations on medical question answering and human-created models outperfect human-made demonstrations. |
Improving Empathetic Response Generation by Recognizing Emotion Cause in Conversations (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to empathetic response generation ignore the emotion cause . existing dialogue systems lack emotion understanding and empathy . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates emotion cause information into empathetic response generation by predicting context emotion labels and sequence of emotion cause-oriented labels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves empathetic response generation by incorporating emotion cause information into the model. |
CuMA: Aligning LLMs with Sparse Cultural Values via Demographic-Aware Mixture of Adapters (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have a global audience, so alignment must extend to cultural resonance. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that frames alignment as a conditional capacity separation problem. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms both dense baselines and semantic-only MoEs on three large language models. |
Retrieval-Augmented Process Reward Model for Generalizable Mathematical Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have advanced mathematical reasoning, but they still struggle with out-of-distribution (OOD) issues. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate the logical validity of reasoning steps . they retrieves semantically similar questions and steps for PRM as a warmup . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baseline models on multiple real-world datasets. |
Improve LLM-as-a-Judge Ability as a General Ability (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies focus on generative judges, but only on their judge ability. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that leverages the generative and reasoning capabilities of large language models to evaluate LLM responses across diverse scenarios, providing accurate preference signals. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs on RewardBench with only 2% to 40% of the data required by other training frameworks. |
A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Search Agents (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yunjia Xi, Jianghao Lin, Yongzhao Xiao, Zheli Zhou, Rong Shan, Te Gao, Jiachen Zhu, Weiwen Liu, Yong Yu, Weinan Zhang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized web search, but their integration is static and cannot handle complex contexts. |
| Approach: | They analyze existing research and analyze existing work from the perspectives of architecture, optimization, application, and evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can comprehend user intentions and context and execute multi-turn retrieval with dynamic planning, extending search capabilities far beyond the web. |
A Comprehensive Survey of Process Reward Models: Data Generation, Model Construction, and Usage (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Congmin Zheng, Jiachen Zhu, Zhuoying Ou, Yuxiang Chen, Kangning Zhang, Rong Shan, Zeyu Zheng, Mengyue Yang, Jianghao Lin, Yong Yu, Weinan Zhang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced reasoning ability, yet conventional alignment remains dominated by outcome reward models that judge only final answers. |
| Approach: | They summarize applications across math, code, text, multimodal reasoning, robotics, and agents . goal is to clarify design spaces, reveal open challenges, and guide future research toward fine-grained, robust reasoning alignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model enables finer credit assignment, richer diagnostics, and improved robustness. |