Large Language Models are In-context Teachers for Knowledge Reasoning (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-context teaching is a method of providing in-concept example rationales to a student to reason over unseen cases. |
| Approach: | They propose to use an LLM's self-elicited explanations as in-context demonstrations to prompt a student to reason over unseen cases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms human-crafted demonstrations on medical question answering and human-created models outperfect human-made demonstrations. |
Similar Papers
Out-of-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a lightweight technique trains only new token embeddings on axioms and evaluates them on unseen tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a lightweight technique that trains only new token embeddings on axioms . they train only new embeddables and evaluate them on unseen tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique trains only new token embeddings on axioms and evaluates them on unseen tasks. |
Learning vs Retrieval: The Role of In-Context Examples in Regression with Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on in-context learning mechanisms are not consistent . current research identifies two main approaches to explain the ICL mechanism . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for evaluating in-context learning mechanisms by focusing on regression tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can solve regression problems and then measure the extent to which the LLM retrieves its internal knowledge versus learning from in-context examples. |
What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesis. (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained large language models have exhibited an impressive ability to learn in context across various domains, e.g., code generation, education, medicine and even medicine. |
| Approach: | They taxonomize existing candidate theories into three competing hypotheses that explain LLMs’ ability to learn in context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can learn a task from in-context examples presented in a demonstration and generalize it to the prompt. |
A Systematic Analysis of Large Language Models as Soft Reasoners: The Case of Syllogistic Inferences (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | syllogistic reasoning is a deductive reasoning skill that is crucial in everyday problem-solving and decision-making experiences. |
| Approach: | They propose to study the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) they propose to use supervised fine-tuning and chain-of-thought reasoning to investigate their results. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models exhibit reasoning biases, avoid answering that no conclusion follows, align with human difficulties, and struggle with multi-step reasoning. |
Tutor-ICL: Guiding Large Language Models for Improved In-Context Learning Performance (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-context learning (ICL) is a dominant paradigm in natural language processing. |
| Approach: | They propose a prompting method for classification tasks using exemplar answers in a *comparative format' they also propose introducing a test instance before the exemplars to improve performance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves up to 13.76% increase in accuracy on classification tasks across decoder-only and encoder-decoder LLMs. |
Rethinking the Role of Scale for In-Context Learning: An Interpretability-based Case Study at 66 Billion Scale (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | 70% of attention heads and 20% of the feed forward networks can be removed with minimal decline in task performance. |
| Approach: | They propose to investigate whether in-context learning is not uniform across all components of a large language model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can remove 70% of attention heads and 20% of feed forward networks with minimal decline in task performance. |
No Need for Explanations: LLMs can implicitly learn from mistakes in-context (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing literature assumes that correct answers to large language models must be accompanied by comprehensive rationales to be helpful. |
| Approach: | They propose to show incorrect answers to Large Language Models (LLMs) as a popular strategy to improve their performance in reasoning-intensive tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms chain-of-thought prompting in math reasoning tasks. |
LM-CORE: Language Models with Contextually Relevant External Knowledge (2022.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large pre-trained language models can capture factual knowledge in their parameters but storing large amounts of knowledge in the model parameters is sub-optimal given the ever-growing amounts of information and resource requirements. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that provides explicit access to contextually relevant structured knowledge to the model and train it to use that knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art knowledge-enhanced language models on knowledge probing tasks and can handle knowledge updates. |
Are Large Language Model Temporally Grounded? (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent large language models lack a consistent temporal model of textual narratives . sentence ordering in unlabelled texts is only weakly correlated with event ordering . |
| Approach: | They evaluate LLMs with textual narratives and evaluate their common-sense knowledge . they find that LLM models struggle the most with self-consistency . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models lack a consistent temporal model of textual narratives. |
Large Language Models Are Reasoning Teachers (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting can elicit language models to solve complex reasoning tasks step-by-step. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that uses large model samples as reasoning teachers to fine-tune smaller models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms prompt-based methods and the teacher model in many tasks and extends it by leveraging the teacher's ability to generate multiple rationales for each original sample. |