| Challenge: | Existing studies on textual sarcasm detection use manual labelling and tag-based distant supervision to detect sarcasm. |
| Approach: | They define author context as the embedded representation of their historical tweets and suggest neural models that extract these representations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models achieve state-of-the-art on two datasets labelled manually and via tag-based distant supervision indicating a difference between intended and perceived sarcasm . |
Similar Papers
iSarcasm: A Dataset of Intended Sarcasm (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for detecting intended sarcasm have shown low performance compared to previous studies. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset of tweets labeled for intended sarcasm by their authors . they aim to encourage future NLP research to develop methods for detecting sarkasmus in text as intended by the authors of the text . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows that existing methods are biased or obvious and sarcasm could be understudied. |
Representing Social Media Users for Sarcasm Detection (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing annotated corpus of Reddit comments is limited by available annotation methods. |
| Approach: | They propose a Bayesian approach that directly represents authors’ propensities to be sarcastic and a dense embedding approach that can learn interactions between the author and the text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach performs better in homogeneous contexts, whereas the dense embeddings prove valuable in more diverse contexts. |
Perceived and Intended Sarcasm Detection with Graph Attention Networks (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing sarcasm detection systems focus on exploiting linguistic markers, context, or user-level priors, but social studies suggest that the relationship between the author and the audience can be equally relevant for the sarkasmal usage and interpretation. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework leveraging a user context from their historical tweets together with social information from a users neighborhood in an interaction graph to contextualize the interpretation of the post. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework combines a user context from their historical tweets with social information from a users neighborhood in an interaction graph to contextualize the interpretation of the post. |
Sarcasm Target Identification: Dataset and An Introductory Approach (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Past work on sarcasm detection has focused on identifying the sarcasm target of ridicule in a sarkastic text. |
| Approach: | They propose a task of extracting the sarcastic target of ridicule from a sarcastical text using a manually annotated dataset and an automatic approach. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach establishes the viability of sarcasm target identification and will serve as a baseline for future work. |
Affective and Contextual Embedding for Sarcasm Detection (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to detect sarcasm from text lack vocal intonation or facial gestures in textual data. |
| Approach: | They propose two deep neural network models for sarcasm detection that extend the architecture of BERT by incorporating both affective and contextual features. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform state-of-the-art models on different datasets with significant margins. |
A deep-learning framework to detect sarcasm targets (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for sarcasm target detection are difficult to implement in natural language processing. |
| Approach: | They propose a deep learning framework for sarcasm target detection in predefined sarkastic texts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves accuracy and accuracy in match and dice scores compared to the current state-of-the-art framework. |
Generalizable Sarcasm Detection is Just Around the Corner, of Course! (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | sarcasm can be used to hurt, criticize, or deride but also to be mocking, humorous, or to bond. |
| Approach: | They tested the robustness of sarcasm detection models by fine-tuning their behavior on four sarkasmatic datasets . they found that models performed better when fine- tuned with third-party labels than with author labels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models performed better when fine-tuned with third-party labels than with author labels on the same dataset and across different datasets. |
CASCADE: Contextual Sarcasm Detection in Online Discussion Forums (C18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on sarcasm detection focus on lexical, syntactic and semantic cues, but sarcasm can be expressed implicitly without such cue. |
| Approach: | They propose a ContextuAl SarCasm DEtector which extracts contextual information from the discourse of a discussion thread. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on a large Reddit corpus. |
Sarcasm Detection is Way Too Easy! An Empirical Comparison of Human and Machine Sarcasm Detection (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | sarcasm detection datasets focus on intended, rather than perceived sarcasm, but there is no comparison between human and machine performance. |
| Approach: | They collect author-annotated sarcasm datasets that focus on intended, rather than perceived sarcasticism . they compare human-level benchmarks to that of state-of-the-art sarkasmatic detection systems . |
| Outcome: | The proposed datasets compare human and machine performance on sarcastic tasks in English and Arabic. |
Reactive Supervision: A New Method for Collecting Sarcasm Data (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | sarcasm detection requires large amounts of labeled data, with a high cost and noisy labels. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that uses the dynamics of online conversations to collect sarcasm data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can be adapted to other affective computing domains, opening up new research opportunities. |