| Challenge: | Existing methods for detecting intended sarcasm have shown low performance compared to previous studies. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset of tweets labeled for intended sarcasm by their authors . they aim to encourage future NLP research to develop methods for detecting sarkasmus in text as intended by the authors of the text . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows that existing methods are biased or obvious and sarcasm could be understudied. |
Similar Papers
Exploring Author Context for Detecting Intended vs Perceived Sarcasm (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on textual sarcasm detection use manual labelling and tag-based distant supervision to detect sarcasm. |
| Approach: | They define author context as the embedded representation of their historical tweets and suggest neural models that extract these representations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models achieve state-of-the-art on two datasets labelled manually and via tag-based distant supervision indicating a difference between intended and perceived sarcasm . |
Sarcasm Target Identification: Dataset and An Introductory Approach (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Past work on sarcasm detection has focused on identifying the sarcasm target of ridicule in a sarkastic text. |
| Approach: | They propose a task of extracting the sarcastic target of ridicule from a sarcastical text using a manually annotated dataset and an automatic approach. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach establishes the viability of sarcasm target identification and will serve as a baseline for future work. |
Sarcasm Detection is Way Too Easy! An Empirical Comparison of Human and Machine Sarcasm Detection (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | sarcasm detection datasets focus on intended, rather than perceived sarcasm, but there is no comparison between human and machine performance. |
| Approach: | They collect author-annotated sarcasm datasets that focus on intended, rather than perceived sarcasticism . they compare human-level benchmarks to that of state-of-the-art sarkasmatic detection systems . |
| Outcome: | The proposed datasets compare human and machine performance on sarcastic tasks in English and Arabic. |
Representing Social Media Users for Sarcasm Detection (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing annotated corpus of Reddit comments is limited by available annotation methods. |
| Approach: | They propose a Bayesian approach that directly represents authors’ propensities to be sarcastic and a dense embedding approach that can learn interactions between the author and the text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach performs better in homogeneous contexts, whereas the dense embeddings prove valuable in more diverse contexts. |
Generalizable Sarcasm Detection is Just Around the Corner, of Course! (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | sarcasm can be used to hurt, criticize, or deride but also to be mocking, humorous, or to bond. |
| Approach: | They tested the robustness of sarcasm detection models by fine-tuning their behavior on four sarkasmatic datasets . they found that models performed better when fine- tuned with third-party labels than with author labels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models performed better when fine-tuned with third-party labels than with author labels on the same dataset and across different datasets. |
Perceived and Intended Sarcasm Detection with Graph Attention Networks (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing sarcasm detection systems focus on exploiting linguistic markers, context, or user-level priors, but social studies suggest that the relationship between the author and the audience can be equally relevant for the sarkasmal usage and interpretation. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework leveraging a user context from their historical tweets together with social information from a users neighborhood in an interaction graph to contextualize the interpretation of the post. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework combines a user context from their historical tweets with social information from a users neighborhood in an interaction graph to contextualize the interpretation of the post. |
The Design and Construction of a Chinese Sarcasm Dataset (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing sarcasm datasets are limited to English and Chinese . sarcasm is a multi-layered semi-conscious language phenomenon . |
| Approach: | They propose to build a high-quality Chinese sarcasm dataset using user comments . they use manual annotated sarkastic texts and non-sarcastic texts to train sarcasm classifier . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset contains 2,486 manual annotated sarcastic texts and 89,296 non-sarcatic texts. |
Just Like a Human Would, Direct Access to Sarcasm Augmented with Potential Result and Reaction (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | sarcasm is a form of irony conveying mockery and contempt . social media has become increasingly popular for identifying sarcasm . |
| Approach: | They develop a method to detect sarcasm from social media using augmented potentials. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms baselines on benchmark datasets. |
A Multimodal Corpus for Emotion Recognition in Sarcasm (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | sarcasm and emotion are often used in conversational systems to generate the right response. |
| Approach: | They use a sarcastic expression dataset pre-annotated with 9 emotions to detect emotion . they identify and correct 343 incorrect emotion labels and label each sarkastic utterance with one of four sarcasm types. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art sarcasm detection methods by using a multimodal sarcastic detection dataset. |
Towards Multimodal Sarcasm Detection (An _Obviously_ Perfect Paper) (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
Santiago Castro, Devamanyu Hazarika, Verónica Pérez-Rosas, Roger Zimmermann, Rada Mihalcea, Soujanya Poria
| Challenge: | sarcasm is often expressed through multiple verbal and non-verbal cues, such as a change of tone, overemphasis, drawn-out syllables, or a straight looking face. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multimodal cues to improve sarcasm detection using audiovisual utterances annotated with sarcasm labels to improve the accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset reduces the error rate of sarcasm detection by 12.9% . it is based on audiovisual utterances annotated with sarcasm labels . |