Linguistic Cues to Deception and Perceived Deception in Interview Dialogues (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study examined deception detection in several domains, including fake reviews, mock crime scenes, and opinions about topics such as abortion or the death penalty. |
| Approach: | They analyze linguistic features in truthful and deceptive interview dialogues . they also examine interviewer perceptions of deception, identifying characteristics of deceptives . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms human classifications using linguistic features and individual traits. |
Similar Papers
Acoustic-Prosodic and Lexical Cues to Deception and Trust: Deciphering How People Detect Lies (2020.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | LieCatcher collects ratings of perceived deception using corpus of deceptive and truthful interviews . acoustic-prosodic and linguistic characteristics of language trusted and mistrusted are not reliable cues . |
| Approach: | They used a game framework to collect ratings of perceived deception using deceptive and truthful interviews to understand how perception aligns with reality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework detects deception using a corpus of deceptive and truthful interviews. |
To Tell The Truth: Language of Deception and Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evidence of people’s ability to discern truth from text-based false information is scarce. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a large language model to learn discernible cues from TV game show data to investigate whether textual cue is more likely to detect fraud . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model detects novel but accurate language cues in many cases where humans failed to detect deception. |
BERTective: Language Models and Contextual Information for Deception Detection (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to classify texts as truthful or deceptive are limited by the context of the text being analyzed. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a corpus of Italian dialogues to classify texts as truthful or deceptive. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show that not all contexts are equally useful to the task. |
Box of Lies: Multimodal Deception Detection in Dialogues (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Deception occurs during everyday conversations, but this setting has received little attention from the research community. |
| Approach: | They propose to analyze multimodal deceptive dialogues in a box of lies game . they use facial and linguistic annotations to identify deceptives and truthful behaviors . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms both a random and a human baseline and achieves up to 69% accuracy in distinguishing deceptive and truthful behaviors. |
Detecting Concealed Information in Text and Speech (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | despite the importance and potential impact of detecting concealed information, research on detecting it has been scarce. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-task learning framework that automatically detects concealed information from text and speech using acoustic-prosodic, linguistic, and individual feature sets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms human performance by 15% in acoustic, linguistic, and individual features. |
“Does it Matter When I Think You Are Lying?” Improving Deception Detection by Integrating Interlocutor’s Judgements in Conversations (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for deception detection are based on interrogator's perceptions of truth-bias . despite its frequent occurrences, human is not good at detecting deceptions despite inclination of truth bias . |
| Approach: | They propose a Judgmental-Enhanced Automatic Deception Detection Network that explicitly considers interrogator's perceived truths-deceptions with three types of speechlanguage features extracted during a conversation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the current state-of-the-art approach without conditioning on interrogator's judgements. |
How Entangled is Factuality and Deception in German? (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research on deception detection and fact checking conflates factual accuracy with truthfulness . a belief-based deception framework defines texts as deceptive when there is a mismatch between what people say and what they truly believe . |
| Approach: | They assess if presumed patterns of deception generalize to German language texts . they gauge the impact of deceptiveness on the downstream task of fact checking . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework disentangles deception when there is a mismatch between what people say and what they truly believe . the proposed framework does not find any correlation with established cues of deception . |
Do dialogue representations align with perception? An empirical study (2023.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | masked language models produce stronger correlations than auto-regressive models, but humans and models make different response selection mistakes. |
| Approach: | They propose to use spoken conversation as a model to measure human comprehension behaviour. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the model which produces the strongest correlation with human responses. |
Improving Cross-domain, Cross-lingual and Multi-modal Deception Detection (2022.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Deception detection is a deliberate choice to mislead to gain some advantage or avoid some penalty. |
| Approach: | They propose to use inter-domain distance to identify suitable source domain for a given target domain to improve cross-domain deception classification and to better understand multi-modal deception detection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods will be able to detect deception in cross-domain, cross-lingual and multi-modal settings and will improve multi-modular deception classification. |
Rhetorical Structure Approach for Online Deception Detection: A Survey (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on how people use language to inform and misinform are relevant. |
| Approach: | They analyze how discourse structure is applied to fake news detection on the web and social media. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is applied to fake news and fake reviews detection on the web and social media. |