Challenge: Argumentation is a process of reaching consensus through premises and rebuttals and is important for making decisions and exchanging views.
Approach: They propose to create argumentation structures in ten languages using argumentation databases . they also examine differences between the two languages to determine their effectiveness .
Outcome: The proposed arguments can be applied to argumentative dialogue systems and can be used as training data.

Similar Papers

Combining Argumentation Structure and Language Model for Generating Natural Argumentative Dialogue (2022.aacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Argumentative dialogue is important process where speakers discuss a specific theme for consensus building or decision making.
Approach: They propose a method to generate argumentative dialogues by combining argumentation structure and language model.
Outcome: The proposed method significantly improves the naturalness of arguments without losing consistency.
Unveiling the Power of Argument Arrangement in Online Persuasive Discussions (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study shows that the CMV is the best time period in human history for the vast majority of people.
Approach: They extend a semantic argumentation unit type model by clustering type sequences into different argument arrangement patterns and representing discussions as sequences of these patterns.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing classifiers on the change my view forum discussion data.
SAD: A Large-Scale Strategic Argumentative Dialogue Dataset (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Argumentation is a key part of human reasoning and decision-making . existing argumentative corpora focus on single-turn settings, but multi-turn dialogues are often realized as multi-turned dialogues .
Approach: They present a dataset for strategic multi-turn argumentation dialogues . they annotate each utterance with five strategy types, allowing multiple strategies per utterrance .
Outcome: The proposed dataset shows that explicit prompting improves fluency, stylistic coherence and persuasiveness.
Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Argumentation is an essential tool in various domains, including law, public policy, and artificial intelligence.
Approach: They propose to evaluate LLMs on various computational argumentation tasks . they organize existing tasks into six main categories and standardize the format of 14 datasets .
Outcome: The proposed model performs well on argument mining and argument generation tasks.
Modeling Frames in Argumentation (D19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: In argumentation, framing is used to emphasize a specific aspect of a topic while concealing others.
Approach: They propose an unsupervised method for framing arguments into non-overlapping frames . authors propose a corpus of 12, 326 debate-portal arguments organized along the frames of debates' topics .
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms baselines on the argumentation task by 0.28 points.
A Brief Survey of Textual Dialogue Corpora (2022.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Several dialogue corpora are available for research purposes, but they do not cover all the necessities of real-world applications.
Approach: They analyze available dialogue corpora and propose possible approaches to create new ones.
Outcome: The proposed corpus of human-human dialogues is based on a list of available dialogue corpora . it covers speakers, size, languages, collection, annotations, and domains . some trends are identified and possible approaches are also discussed .
Automatic Generation of Large-scale Multi-turn Dialogues from Reddit (2022.coling-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using a set of algorithms, we can generate large dialogue corpus from Reddit.
Approach: They propose to automatically convert posts and their comments from discussion forums such as Reddit into multi-turn dialogues.
Outcome: The proposed methods improve on the baseline method by 36.3% . the best method shows an improvement of 36.6% over the previous one .
Exploring the Role of Argument Structure in Online Debate Persuasion (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work in NLP has shown that linguistic features extracted from debate text and features encoding the characteristics of the audience are both critical in persuasion studies.
Approach: They propose to incorporate argument structure features into an LSTM-based model to assess the persuasiveness of debates.
Outcome: The proposed model incorporates argument structure features to predict debaters that make the most convincing arguments on online debate forums.
A Corpus for Modeling User and Language Effects in Argumentation on Online Debating (P19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing argumentation datasets have allowed only limited assessment of "user" traits because information on background of users is generally unavailable.
Approach: They present a dataset of 78,376 debates generated over a 10-year period along with surprisingly comprehensive participant profiles.
Outcome: The proposed dataset includes 78,376 debates generated over a 10-year period along with comprehensive participant profiles.
Let’s Negotiate! A Survey of Negotiation Dialogue Systems (2024.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent research has focused on negotiation dialogue systems, but no systematic review of this task has been conducted.
Approach: They propose to provide a systematic review of negotiation dialogue systems and to provide an overview of current research.
Outcome: The proposed systems are based on the literature and are compared against existing systems.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations