Papers by Johannes Kiesel

7 papers
Identifying the Human Values behind Arguments (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: et al., 2003) examines human values in natural language arguments . authors provide a dataset of 5270 arguments from four geographical cultures .
Approach: They propose a multi-level taxonomy of human values with 54 values and a dataset of 5270 arguments from four geographical cultures, manually annotated for human values.
Outcome: The proposed model shows that human values are more diverse than previously thought . it shows that people disagree on the best course forward on controversial issues .
Unveiling the Power of Argument Arrangement in Online Persuasive Discussions (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study shows that the CMV is the best time period in human history for the vast majority of people.
Approach: They extend a semantic argumentation unit type model by clustering type sequences into different argument arrangement patterns and representing discussions as sequences of these patterns.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing classifiers on the change my view forum discussion data.
A Stylometric Inquiry into Hyperpartisan and Fake News (P18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a style analysis of hyperpartisan news and fake news can distinguish them from mainstream news . left-wing and right-wing news share significantly more stylistic similarities than mainstream news does .
Approach: a comparative style analysis of hyperpartisan news and fake news is carried out . authors show that left-wing and right-wing news share significantly more stylistic similarities .
Outcome: a style analysis can distinguish hyperpartisan news from mainstream, satire from both . left-wing and right-wing news share significantly more stylistic similarities than mainstream .
Topic Ontologies for Arguments (2023.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Many computational argumentation tasks, such as stance classification, are topic-dependent.
Approach: They map the argumentation landscape using the World Economic Forum, Wikipedia and Debatepedia as sources for argument topics.
Outcome: The argument ontology is the first comprehensive assessment of argument topics in argument corpora.
News Editorials: Towards Summarizing Long Argumentative Texts (2020.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using news summarization, we aim to target opinionated articles with a well-defined argumentation structure.
Approach: They present a corpus of carefully curated summaries for 266 news editorials.
Outcome: The summarization of opinionated articles with a well-defined argumentation structure is evaluated using a tailored annotation scheme.
SCAI-QReCC Shared Task on Conversational Question Answering (2022.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: evaluating systems for conversational QA remains an open research problem in its own right . evaluating (conversational) QA systems remains an important challenge for developing conversational information retrieval (conversional search) systems.
Approach: They propose to use a conversational question answering task to extend the original conversational QA dataset with alternative correct answers produced by participant systems.
Outcome: The proposed task was based on the SCAI-QReCC 2021 shared task on conversational question answering.
The Touché23-ValueEval Dataset for Identifying Human Values behind Arguments (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Cultural norms can influence the prioritization of values, leading to distinct perspectives on debatable topics.
Approach: They present a Touché23-ValueEval dataset that annotates 4780 new arguments and annotated 54 human values.
Outcome: The Touché23-ValueEval dataset doubles the original Webis-ArgValués-22 dataset to 9324 arguments.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations