YongKang Liu, Jiayang Yu, Mingyang Wang, Yiqun Zhang, Ercong Nie, Shi Feng, Daling Wang, Kaisong Song, Hinrich Schuetze
| Challenge: | Argumentation is a key part of human reasoning and decision-making . existing argumentative corpora focus on single-turn settings, but multi-turn dialogues are often realized as multi-turned dialogues . |
| Approach: | They present a dataset for strategic multi-turn argumentation dialogues . they annotate each utterance with five strategy types, allowing multiple strategies per utterrance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that explicit prompting improves fluency, stylistic coherence and persuasiveness. |
Similar Papers
Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argumentation is an essential tool in various domains, including law, public policy, and artificial intelligence. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLMs on various computational argumentation tasks . they organize existing tasks into six main categories and standardize the format of 14 datasets . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on argument mining and argument generation tasks. |
Creating Large-Scale Argumentation Structures for Dialogue Systems (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
Kazuki Sakai, Akari Inago, Ryuichiro Higashinaka, Yuichiro Yoshikawa, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Junji Tomita
| Challenge: | Argumentation is a process of reaching consensus through premises and rebuttals and is important for making decisions and exchanging views. |
| Approach: | They propose to create argumentation structures in ten languages using argumentation databases . they also examine differences between the two languages to determine their effectiveness . |
| Outcome: | The proposed arguments can be applied to argumentative dialogue systems and can be used as training data. |
A Multi-layer Annotated Corpus of Argumentative Text: From Argument Schemes to Discourse Relations (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent interest in Argumentation Mining has brought to the fore the need for corpora annotated with argument information, which can be used as training data. |
| Approach: | They propose a set of guidelines for the annotation of argument schemes and a new annotation tool for the 'inferential' argument schemes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed corpus includes 112 argumentative microtexts and a new annotation tool. |
Recent Trends in Personalized Dialogue Generation: A Review of Datasets, Methodologies, and Evaluations (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Personalization is a multifaceted process that requires multiple definitions and varies between individuals. |
| Approach: | They propose to systemically survey the recent landscape of personalized dialogue generation including the datasets employed, methodologies developed, and evaluation metrics applied. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate fluent and coherent responses to human queries in a language-based conversational agent. |
Unveiling the Power of Argument Arrangement in Online Persuasive Discussions (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that the CMV is the best time period in human history for the vast majority of people. |
| Approach: | They extend a semantic argumentation unit type model by clustering type sequences into different argument arrangement patterns and representing discussions as sequences of these patterns. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing classifiers on the change my view forum discussion data. |
Combining Argumentation Structure and Language Model for Generating Natural Argumentative Dialogue (2022.aacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argumentative dialogue is important process where speakers discuss a specific theme for consensus building or decision making. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to generate argumentative dialogues by combining argumentation structure and language model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves the naturalness of arguments without losing consistency. |
We Argue to Agree: Towards Personality-Driven Argumentation-Based Negotiation Dialogue Systems for Tourism (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argumentation mechanisms are integrated into negotiation dialogue systems to improve conflict resolution and adaptability. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset of Argumentation Profile, Preference Profile, and Buying Style Profiles to generate personality-driven dialogues in negotiation dialogue systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task improves argumentation mechanisms and adaptability by aligning interactions with individuals’ preferences and styles. |
A Dataset of Argumentative Dialogues on Scientific Papers (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in question-answering models have made them a great asset in accessing the content of scientific papers. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset of 41 argumentative dialogues between scientists on 20 NLP papers to improve and evaluate their question-answering models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset includes both exploratory and argumentative questions and answers in a dialogue discourse on a scientific paper. |
Automatic Generation of Large-scale Multi-turn Dialogues from Reddit (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using a set of algorithms, we can generate large dialogue corpus from Reddit. |
| Approach: | They propose to automatically convert posts and their comments from discussion forums such as Reddit into multi-turn dialogues. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve on the baseline method by 36.3% . the best method shows an improvement of 36.6% over the previous one . |
Integrating Argumentation and Hate-Speech-based Techniques for Countering Misinformation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | scalable strategies to combat online misinformation are short-term and insufficient, authors say . current reactive approaches, like content flagging and banning, do little to change perception of misinformants . human evaluations show that our framework generates expert-like responses . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that generates persuasive responses from hate-speech counter-responses . human evaluations show that the framework generates expert-like responses . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework generates expert-like responses and is 14% more engaging, 21% more natural, and 18% more factual than the best available alternatives. |