| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating paraphrases fall into one of these broad categories -rule-based, seq2seq, deep generative models and a varied combination. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that combines transformer and sequence-to-sequence models for better quality of generated paraphrases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves on two datasets-QUORA and MSCOCO using transformer and sequence-to-sequence models. |
Similar Papers
Query and Output: Generating Words by Querying Distributed Word Representations for Paraphrase Generation (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models tend to memorize words instead of learning meaning of words . existing models tend not to model semantic information, resulting in incorrect sentences . |
| Approach: | They propose a novel model that generates words by querying distributed word representations . they evaluate model on two paraphrase-oriented tasks, namely text simplification and short abstractive summarization . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the baseline model on two paraphrase-oriented tasks . it achieves state-of-the-art performance on these benchmark datasets . |
Select, Extract and Generate: Neural Keyphrase Generation with Layer-wise Coverage Attention (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Generally, documents are truncated before being inputs to deep neural networks, resulting in missing keyphrases . evaluators use layer-wise coverage attention to cover all the critical points in a document . |
| Approach: | They propose a neural keyphrase generation model that identifies the salient sentences in a document and an extractor-generator that jointly extracts and generates keyphrases from the selected sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art keyphrase generation methods on keyphrases generated from scientific and web documents. |
Multi-task Learning for Paraphrase Generation With Keyword and Part-of-Speech Reconstruction (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | PGKPR is a deep learning approach to generate paraphrases using key semantics of the source sentence. |
| Approach: | They propose a model with keyword and part-of-speech reconstruction for paraphrase generation using deep learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms comparative models on two commonly-used datasets. |
Semi-Supervised Learning for Neural Keyphrase Generation (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for keyphrase generation only use labeled data, which is limited to resource-rich domains. |
| Approach: | They propose semi-supervised keyphrase generation methods by leveraging labeled data and large-scale unlabeled samples for learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform state-of-the-art models trained with labeled data and large-scale unlabeled samples for learning. |
Denoising based Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Text Generation (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | PoDA pre-trains encoders and decoders by denoising noise-corrupted text . Unlike encoder-only or decode-only methods, it can be used for text generation tasks without using any task-specific techniques. |
| Approach: | They propose a sequence-to-sequence (seq2sequ) pre-training method PoDA which denoises autoencoders by denoising noise-corrupted text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves model performance over strong baselines without using any task-specific techniques and significantly speed up convergence. |
Rethinking Model Selection and Decoding for Keyphrase Generation with Pre-trained Sequence-to-Sequence Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Keyphrase generation is a longstanding task in NLP with widespread applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a likelihood-based decode-select algorithm for seq2seq PLMs that improves greedy search by an average of 4.7% semantic F1 across five datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm improves greedy search by an average of 4.7% semantic F1 across five datasets. |
Pushing Paraphrase Away from Original Sentence: A Multi-Round Paraphrase Generation Approach (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent years, neural paraphrase generation models have demonstrated superior performance, but the output paraphrase still lacks diversity. |
| Approach: | They propose a back-translation guided multi-round paraphrase generation framework which leverages multi- round paraphrases to improve diversity while preserving semantic information. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves diversity while preserving semantic information. |
Paraphrase Generation with Deep Reinforcement Learning (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Paraphrase generation is an important but challenging task in natural language processing . traditional symbolic approaches to paraphrase generation include rule-based methods, thesaurus-based approaches and statistical machine translation (SMT) |
| Approach: | They propose a deep reinforcement learning approach to automatic paraphrase generation . they propose supervised learning and reinforcement learning for evaluators . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods in paraphrase generation on two datasets. |
Controllable Paraphrase Generation for Semantic and Lexical Similarities (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Lexically diverse paraphrases are crucial in data augmentation because they enhance the linguistic diversity of the corpus. |
| Approach: | They propose a controllable model for semantic and lexical similarities by attaching tags to the head of the input sentence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can paraphrase an input sentence according to the tags specified. |
Neural-Driven Search-Based Paraphrase Generation (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing non-supervised paraphrase generation models are biased toward specific problems like question answering or image captioning. |
| Approach: | They propose a search-based paraphrase generation scheme where candidate paraphrases are generated by iterated transformations from the original sentence and evaluated in terms of syntax quality, semantic distance, and lexical distance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithms perform well against non-supervised baselines. |