Challenge: Existing semantic parsers only select a set of database constants at training time . current models only consider local information, not global ones .
Approach: They propose a semantic parser that globally reasons about the structure of the query to make a more contextually-informed selection of database constants.
Outcome: The proposed model increases accuracy from 39.4% to 47.4% on a zero-shot semantic parsing dataset with complex databases.

Similar Papers

Improving Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing with Fine-grained Query Understanding (2022.emnlp-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent research on Text-to-SQL semantic parsing relies on parser or heuristic based approach to understand natural language query.
Approach: They propose a general-purpose, modular neural semantic parsing framework that is based on token-level fine-grained query understanding.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms the state-of-the-art model by 2.7% on a WikiTableQuestions test set.
Representing Schema Structure with Graph Neural Networks for Text-to-SQL Parsing (P19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Semantic parsing to SQL has largely ignored the structure of the database schema . a recent study used a simple DB that was observed at both training and test time.
Approach: They propose a semantic parser where the schema structure is encoded with a graph neural network and used at both encoding and decoding time.
Outcome: The proposed parser improves from 33.8% to 39.4%, dramatically above the current state of the art, which is at 19.7%.
A Tale of Two Linkings: Dynamically Gating between Schema Linking and Structural Linking for Text-to-SQL Parsing (2020.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for text-to-SQL semantic parsing require strict structured prediction due to its application scenario where the output SQL will be sent to an executor program directly.
Approach: They propose to use schema linking and structural linking to link NL to the database schema.
Outcome: The proposed method shows significant gains on the Spider dataset.
Compositional Semantic Parsing across Graphbanks (P19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing semantic parsers that map sentences to graph-based meaning representations are hand-designed for specific graphbanks.
Approach: They propose a compositional neural semantic parser which achieves competitive accuracies across graphbanks.
Outcome: The proposed system achieves competitive accuracies across a variety of graphbanks.
Searching for Better Database Queries in the Outputs of Semantic Parsers (2023.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: generating a database query from a question in natural language is a longstanding task . the task is amplified when the system needs to generalize to databases unseen at training.
Approach: They propose to generalize a query to databases unseen at training . they use state-of-the-art semantic parsers to find queries that meet the criterion .
Outcome: The proposed approach finds that many queries pass all tests on different datasets.
Uni-Parser: Unified Semantic Parser for Question Answering on Knowledge Base and Database (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches on semantic parsing suffer from exponential growth of logical form candidates and can hardly generalize to unseen data.
Approach: They propose a unified semantic parser for question answering on KB and DB . they define the primitive as the essential element in their framework .
Outcome: The proposed framework can predict logical forms by altering and composing top-ranked primitives with different operations.
Error Detection for Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing text-to-SQL parsers are often over-confident, thus casting doubt on their trustworthiness when deployed for real use.
Approach: They propose a parser-independent error detection model for text-to-SQL semantic parsing . they use a language model of code as its bedrock and graph neural networks to learn structural features of queries .
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms parser-dependent uncertainty metrics on three strong parsers . it could improve the performance and usability of text-to-SQL semantic parsing, it is shown .
Coarse-to-Fine Decoding for Neural Semantic Parsing (P18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Experimental results show that semantic parsing is more efficient than using simple decoders.
Approach: They propose a structure-aware neural architecture which decomposes the semantic parsing process into two stages.
Outcome: The proposed architecture consistently improves performance on four datasets characteristic of different domains and meaning representations.
A Pilot Study for Chinese SQL Semantic Parsing (D19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing datasets to map natural language text into SQL are limited in their use in question-to-sql mapping.
Approach: They propose to use a Chinese-based semantic parser to map natural language text into SQL.
Outcome: The proposed dataset compares a character-based parser with a word embedding scheme for Chinese . the results show that the parsers are subject to segmentation errors and cross-lingual embedders are useful for text-to-SQL mapping.
Exploring Unexplored Generalization Challenges for Cross-Database Semantic Parsing (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation datasets such as Spider are used to support cross-database semantic parsing . XSP systems that map natural language utterances to SQL queries are evaluated on databases unseen during training.
Approach: They propose a setup that uses eight well-studied datasets to evaluate cross-database semantic parsing systems.
Outcome: The proposed system performs well on spider, but struggles to generalize to the repurposed set.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations