Challenge: Existing evaluation datasets such as Spider are used to support cross-database semantic parsing . XSP systems that map natural language utterances to SQL queries are evaluated on databases unseen during training.
Approach: They propose a setup that uses eight well-studied datasets to evaluate cross-database semantic parsing systems.
Outcome: The proposed system performs well on spider, but struggles to generalize to the repurposed set.

Similar Papers

Improving Generalization in Semantic Parsing by Increasing Natural Language Variation (2024.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches generate question reformulations via models trained on Spider or only introduce local changes. Existing methods generate question form reformulation but lack robustness.
Approach: They use data augmentation to enhance the robustness of text-to-SQL parsers against natural language variations by generating more realistic and diverse questions.
Outcome: The proposed model improves on the new spider dataset by using a few prompts.
Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing datasets for semantic parsing are too small in terms of number of programs for training modern data-intensive models.
Approach: They propose a large-scale complex and cross-domain semantic parsing task for a database . they use a dataset with 10,181 questions and 5,693 unique complex SQL queries .
Outcome: The proposed task is different from previous tasks because it uses the same database and program . the best model achieves only 9.7% exact matching accuracy on a database split setting.
Bridging the Generalization Gap in Text-to-SQL Parsing with Schema Expansion (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing text-to-SQL parsers struggle with out-of-domain generalization problems, arguing that they lack the ability to match domain specific phrases to composite operations over columns.
Approach: They propose to use a synthetic dataset and a re-purposed train/test split to quantify out-of-domain generalization over column operations to address this problem.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms baseline parsers on the domain generalization problem, while boosting the underlying parser’ overall performance by 13.8% relative accuracy gain (5.1% absolute).
XSemPLR: Cross-Lingual Semantic Parsing in Multiple Natural Languages and Meaning Representations (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models for cross-lingual semantic parsing are not able to perform tasks on a wide range of datasets.
Approach: They propose a benchmark for cross-lingual semantic parsing that uses 22 natural languages and 8 meaning representations to translate queries into MRs.
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks cover 22 natural languages and 8 meaning representations on 164 domains and 5 tasks covering a wide range of multilingual language models.
A Pilot Study for Chinese SQL Semantic Parsing (D19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing datasets to map natural language text into SQL are limited in their use in question-to-sql mapping.
Approach: They propose to use a Chinese-based semantic parser to map natural language text into SQL.
Outcome: The proposed dataset compares a character-based parser with a word embedding scheme for Chinese . the results show that the parsers are subject to segmentation errors and cross-lingual embedders are useful for text-to-SQL mapping.
Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both? (2021.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to semantic parsing only evaluated on synthetic datasets that are not representative of natural language variation.
Approach: They propose a semantic parsing approach that handles both natural language variation and compositional generalization.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing models across compositional generalization challenges on non-synthetic datasets while being competitive with the state-of-the-art on standard evaluations.
Towards Generalizable and Robust Text-to-SQL Parsing (2022.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Text-to-SQL parsers must be generalizable and robust against input perturbations.
Approach: They propose a novel framework to learn text-to-SQL parsing in stages to improve parser's ability to acquire general SQL knowledge instead of capturing spurious patterns.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Spider, SParC, and CoSQL datasets.
Exploring Underexplored Limitations of Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Generalization (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing text-to-SQL models do not generalize when faced with domain knowledge that does not frequently appear in training data.
Approach: They propose a human-curated dataset based on the Spider benchmark for text-to-SQL translation.
Outcome: The proposed model performs better on unseen domains than existing models on public benchmarks.
Exploring Schema Generalizability of Text-to-SQL (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing text-to-SQL models are limited in their generalizability, despite their performance being over-estimated.
Approach: They propose a framework to generate novel text-to-SQL data via automatic and synchronous (DS, SQL) pair altering.
Outcome: The proposed framework generates text-to-SQL data via automatic and synchronous (DS, SQL) pair altering.
KaggleDBQA: Realistic Evaluation of Text-to-SQL Parsers (2021.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent large-scale datasets such as Spider and WikiSQL facilitated novel modeling techniques for text-to-SQl parsing.
Approach: They propose a new cross-domain evaluation dataset of real Web databases . they examine the choice of evaluation tasks for text-to-SQL parsers .
Outcome: The proposed model improves accuracy by 13.2% over state-of-the-art parsers in real-life environments.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations