| Challenge: | Experimental results show that semantic parsing is more efficient than using simple decoders. |
| Approach: | They propose a structure-aware neural architecture which decomposes the semantic parsing process into two stages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed architecture consistently improves performance on four datasets characteristic of different domains and meaning representations. |
Similar Papers
Neural Semantic Parsing (P18-5)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Semantic parsing is the study of translating natural language utterances into machine-executable programs. |
| Approach: | They will describe the various approaches researchers have taken to translate natural language into a formal language . they will also discuss why much recent work has chosen to use standard programming languages instead of more linguistically-motivated representations. |
| Outcome: | This paper will describe the various approaches researchers have taken to translate natural language into a formal language. |
Discourse Representation Structure Parsing (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing semantic parsers are data-driven using annotated examples consisting of utterances and their meaning representations. |
| Approach: | They propose a method which transforms Discourse Representation Structures (DRSs) to trees and develop a structure-aware model which decomposes the decoding process into three stages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models on the Groningen Meaning Bank (GMB) by a wide margin. |
AdaNSP: Uncertainty-driven Adaptive Decoding in Neural Semantic Parsing (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Semantic parsing (SP) maps a natural language utterance into a formal language . standard Seq2Seq models ignore underlying grammars and may give ill-formed results. |
| Approach: | They propose an end-to-end model for semantic parsing that transduces a natural language sentence to the formal semantic representation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art models and does not need expertise like predefined grammar or sketches in the meantime. |
Improving Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing with Fine-grained Query Understanding (2022.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Jun Wang, Patrick Ng, Alexander Hanbo Li, Jiarong Jiang, Zhiguo Wang, Bing Xiang, Ramesh Nallapati, Sudipta Sengupta
| Challenge: | Recent research on Text-to-SQL semantic parsing relies on parser or heuristic based approach to understand natural language query. |
| Approach: | They propose a general-purpose, modular neural semantic parsing framework that is based on token-level fine-grained query understanding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms the state-of-the-art model by 2.7% on a WikiTableQuestions test set. |
AMR Parsing with Latent Structural Information (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs) capture sentence-level semantics structural representations to broad-coverage natural sentences. |
| Approach: | They investigate parsing AMR with explicit dependency structures and interpretable latent structures. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves best results on both AMR 2.0 and AMR 1.0 . the proposed model has been adopted in downstream NLP tasks, including text summarization and question answering. |
Learning Semantic Parsers from Denotations with Latent Structured Alignments and Abstract Programs (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Semantic parsing aims to map natural language utterances onto machine interpretable meaning representations. |
| Approach: | They propose to instill an inductive bias in the parser to help it distinguish between spurious and correct programs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is highly tractable on WikiTableQuestions and WikiSQL datasets. |
Context-Aware Neural Machine Translation Decoding (D19-65)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to enhance neural machine translation systems to take into account document-level information make the training process slower or require document- level annotated data. |
| Approach: | They propose a decoding architecture that fuses the semantic space language model and a neural translation model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves translation quality for English–Spanish using BLEU and METEOR. |
Confidence Modeling for Neural Semantic Parsing (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that neural semantic parsers are difficult to interpret due to their complexity. |
| Approach: | They propose to use confidence models to estimate predictions for neural semantic parsers . they outline three major causes of uncertainty and use metrics to quantify them . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms a widely used method that relies on posterior probability and improves interpretation quality. |
Discourse Representation Parsing for Sentences and Documents (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that our model outperforms competitive baselines by a wide margin. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural model which parses discourse structures of arbitrary length and granularity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models on sentence- and document-level benchmarks. |
Context Dependent Semantic Parsing: A Survey (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Semantic parsing is the task of translating natural language utterances into machine-readable meaning representations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use contextual information to translate natural language utterances into machine-readable meaning representations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods do not utilize contextual information, which could boost the semantic parsing systems. |