Conformal Feedback Alignment: Quantifying Answer-Level Reliability for Robust LLM Alignment (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing uncertainty-aware approaches weight preferences, but ignore reliability of the answers being compared. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that grounds preference weighting in Conformal Predictions to address this problem. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves alignment robustness and data efficiency across different datasets. |
Similar Papers
Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE-Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Arash Ahmadian, Chris Cremer, Matthias Gallé, Marzieh Fadaee, Julia Kreutzer, Olivier Pietquin, Ahmet Üstün, Sara Hooker
| Challenge: | Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is used for RLHF but requires high computational cost and sensitive hyperparameter tuning. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Proximal Policy Optimization to align large language models to human preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method preserves and even increases performance while preserving the motivational principles that led to the development of PPO. |
Probability-Consistent Preference Optimization for Enhanced LLM Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yunqiao Yang, Houxing Ren, Zimu Lu, Ke Wang, Weikang Shi, Aojun Zhou, Junting Pan, Mingjie Zhan, Hongsheng Li
| Challenge: | Recent advances in preference optimization have demonstrated significant potential for improving mathematical reasoning capabilities in large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that establishes two quantitative metrics for preference selection: surface-level answer correctness and intrinsic token-level probability consistency. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing outcome-only criterion approaches across a diverse range of LLMs and benchmarks. |
When to Trust LLMs: Aligning Confidence with Response Quality (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Shuchang Tao, Liuyi Yao, Hanxing Ding, Yuexiang Xie, Qi Cao, Fei Sun, Jinyang Gao, Huawei Shen, Bolin Ding
| Challenge: | Existing methods express reliability by confidence level, but lack objective guidance . Existing approaches express reliability but lack guidance on when to trust LLMs . |
| Approach: | They propose a reward-based approach to align confidence with quality to ensure reliability . they propose 'conqORD' to help model to verbalize greater confidence for higher quality responses . |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that CONQORD significantly improves confidence and response accuracy . the proposed approach can be used to determine reliability of large language models . |
CLHA: A Simple Yet Effective Contrastive Learning Framework for Human Alignment (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Feiteng Fang, Liang Zhu, Xi Feng, Jinchang Hou, Qixuan Zhao, Chengming Li, Xiping Hu, Ruifeng Xu, Min Yang
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have attracted considerable attention from academic and industrial communities due to their outstanding performance in various natural language processing tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a Contrastive Learning Framework for Human Alignment to evaluate the noise within the data and dynamically adjust the training process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses other algorithms in terms of reward model scores, automatic evaluations, and human assessments on the widely used dataset "Helpful and Harmless" |
A Deep Dive into the Trade-Offs of Parameter-Efficient Preference Alignment Techniques (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models are pre-trained on trillions of tokens and instruction-tuned or aligned to specific preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose guidelines to help researchers perform more effective parameter-efficient LLM alignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform preference optimization and outperformed pre-trained models on three key axes. |
ConU: Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Correctness Coverage Guarantees (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Zhiyuan Wang, Jinhao Duan, Lu Cheng, Yue Zhang, Qingni Wang, Xiaoshuang Shi, Kaidi Xu, Heng Tao Shen, Xiaofeng Zhu
| Challenge: | Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in natural language generation tasks remains an open challenge . however, black-box uncertainty measures require investigating with the proliferation of LLMs served via APIs. |
| Approach: | They propose a conformal uncertainty measure and a method to transform heuristic uncertainty notions into rigorous prediction sets. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods and can provide reliable guarantees for open-ended NLG tasks. |
Don’t Forget Your Reward Values: Language Model Alignment via Value-based Calibration (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating large language models have been criticized for their complexity and instability. |
| Approach: | They propose a value-based calibration method to better align Large Language Models with human preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method surpasses existing methods on AI assistant and summarization datasets, providing impressive generalizability, robustness, and diversity in different settings. |
Benchmarking and Improving LLM Robustness for Personalized Generation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations focus on whether a model’s responses align with a user’s preferences, but factuality is an important yet overlooked dimension. |
| Approach: | They propose a scalable framework for evaluating robustness of large language models in personalization and a new dataset, PERGData. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves robustness by 25% across models. |
Confidence Under the Hood: An Investigation into the Confidence-Probability Alignment in Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in high-stakes areas such as healthcare, law, and education. |
| Approach: | They propose a concept of Confidence-Probability Alignment that connects an LLM’s internal confidence to the confidence conveyed in the model’s response when explicitly asked about its certainty. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows the strongest confidence-probability alignment across a wide range of tasks. |
A Grounded Preference Model for LLM Alignment (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Tahira Naseem, Guangxuan Xu, Sarathkrishna Swaminathan, Asaf Yehudai, Subhajit Chaudhury, Radu Florian, Ramón Astudillo, Asim Munawar
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from factual inconsistency and hallucination despite recent advances . training a preference model requires substantial human annotation, which is expensive and labor-intensive. |
| Approach: | They propose to generate synthetic grounded preference data and train a Grounded Preference Model to assess the overall quality of grounded responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate much better grounded responses as judged by GPT4 and achieves the TRUE faithfulness Benchmark. |