CLHA: A Simple Yet Effective Contrastive Learning Framework for Human Alignment (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Feiteng Fang, Liang Zhu, Xi Feng, Jinchang Hou, Qixuan Zhao, Chengming Li, Xiping Hu, Ruifeng Xu, Min Yang
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have attracted considerable attention from academic and industrial communities due to their outstanding performance in various natural language processing tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a Contrastive Learning Framework for Human Alignment to evaluate the noise within the data and dynamically adjust the training process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses other algorithms in terms of reward model scores, automatic evaluations, and human assessments on the widely used dataset "Helpful and Harmless" |
Similar Papers
Improving Discriminative Capability of Reward Models in RLHF Using Contrastive Learning (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Lu Chen, Rui Zheng, Binghai Wang, Senjie Jin, Caishuang Huang, Junjie Ye, Zhihao Zhang, Yuhao Zhou, Zhiheng Xi, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Current methods rely on ranking losses to teach reward model to assess preferences, but they are susceptible to noise and ambiguous data, often failing to deeply understand human intentions. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that incorporates contrastive learning into the reward modeling process to enhance generalization and stabilize the reinforcement learning training process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method enhances generalization of the reward model, stabilizes the reinforcement learning training process, and improves the final alignment with human preferences. |
Aligning as Debiasing: Causality-Aware Alignment via Reinforcement Learning with Interventional Feedback (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to reduce LLMs' biased outputs rely on reward signals from current model outputs without considering the source of biases. |
| Approach: | They propose to leverage the reward model in RL alignment as an instrumental variable to perform causal intervention on LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces biases by using human feedback to fine tune LLMs to human values. |
Aligning Large Language Models with Human Preferences through Representation Engineering (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wenhao Liu, Xiaohua Wang, Muling Wu, Tianlong Li, Changze Lv, Zixuan Ling, Zhu JianHao, Cenyuan Zhang, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing methods for achieving this alignment involve employing reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) Existing approaches involve using RLHF to fine-tune LLMs based on human labels . however, RLRF is susceptible to instability during fine- tuning and presents challenges in implementation. |
| Approach: | They propose to use reinforcement learning from human feedback to fine-tune large language models with human preferences to achieve precise control of model behavior. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that RAHF can be used to capture and manipulate representations to align with a broad spectrum of human preferences or values rather than being confined to a single concept or function. |
RS-DPO: A Hybrid Rejection Sampling and Direct Preference Optimization Method for Alignment of Large Language Models (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) is widely employed to align large language models with user intent. |
| Approach: | They propose to combine rejection sampling and direct preference optimization to improve alignment with user intent by identifying pairs of contrastive samples from human annotator and alternative LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods including RS, PPO, and DPO in a limited resource environment. |
Reinforcement Learning with Supervised Alignment (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is a widely used method for adapting Large Language Models to specific tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that uses supervised fine-tuning to train a reward model for reinforcement learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods on in-domain benchmarks but surpasses them 50 times on out-of-domain and cross-task evaluations. |
Aligning to What? Limits to RLHF Based Alignment (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on RLHF and covert and overt biases in large language models are unclear . et al. analyzed off-the-shelf language models to evaluate their overt and cover racial biase . |
| Approach: | They evaluate the relationship between reinforcement learning from human feedback and biases in large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can be used to mitigat covert biases, the authors show . they found that the RLHF approach calcifies model biase . |
Aligning Large Language Models via Fully Self-Synthetic Data (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) require expensive human-annotated datasets and proprietary models like GPT-4 to annotate preference pairs. |
| Approach: | They propose a self-synthetic framework for LLM alignment where all training data, including prompts (i.e., user queries), responses, and preferences, are generated by the model itself. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enhances the model’s chat capabilities on standard benchmarks like AlpacaEval 2.0 while maintaining strong performance on downstream objective tasks. |
LIRE: listwise reward enhancement for preference alignment (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | prevailing approaches to preference alignment focus on pairwise comparisons, with limited exploration into multi-response scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a listwise reward enhancement approach that integrates offline rewards of multiple responses into a streamlined listwise framework. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms existing methods on dialogue and summarization tasks with good transferability to out-of-distribution data. |
Enhancing Persona Consistency for LLMs’ Role-Playing using Persona-Aware Contrastive Learning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for analyzing and analyzing large language models (LLMs) lack of emotion and fine-grained role awareness limits the model’s ability to provide personalized and diverse interactions further. |
| Approach: | They propose an annotation-free framework to align LLMs’ behavior during role-playing, enhancing the model’s role consistency. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms vanilla LLMs under automatic evaluation methods and human expert evaluation. |
DEFT: Distribution-guided Efficient Fine-Tuning for Human Alignment (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that the methods enhanced by DEFT outperform the original methods in both alignment capability and generalization ability, with significantly reduced training time. |
| Approach: | They propose a distribution-based alignment framework that integrates data filtering and distributional guidance to improve alignment efficiency and generalization ability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods in alignment capability and generalization ability with significantly reduced training time. |