DKME: Rethinking Coupled Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing memory-based editors suffer from catastrophic forgetting as edits accumulate. |
| Approach: | They propose a method which injects factual updates into large language models without retraining or finetuning into existing memory-based editors. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on HalluEditBench, CKnowEdit, and WikiDatacounterfact show that the proposed model achieves a more favorable trade-off between editing success and locality compared to baselines while maintaining more stable performance as the edit scale increases. |
Similar Papers
Knowledge Decoupling via Orthogonal Projection for Lifelong Editing of Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for enhancing large language models (LLMs) have achieved some success, but their knowledge understanding and memory capacity significantly degrades after extensive editing. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that stores the basis vectors of the representation space of past edits in a knowledge cache and projects the gradient of the current edit onto a space orthogonal to previous knowledge for updating. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves question-answering ability and hallucination mitigation by 14% and 61% for large language models after 3,000 edits. |
Knowledge Graph-Driven Memory Editing with Directional Interventions (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are hampered by inaccuracies and outdated information. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that constructs knowledge graphs using available information to guide the direction of knowledge editing. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework allows consistent, aligned, and stable information during large-scale editing scenarios. |
Serial Lifelong Editing via Mixture of Knowledge Experts (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Lifelong Knowledge Editing methods struggle to overwrite outdated knowledge with the latest one. |
| Approach: | They propose a new Mixture-of-Knowledge-Experts scheme with an ARM . ARM ensures that each update completely overwrites old information with the latest one . Experimental results show that ARM performs favorably against SOTA knowledge editing methods . |
| Outcome: | The proposed scheme overwrites old knowledge with the latest data on a benchmark . it performs favorably against existing knowledge editing methods on the same concept . |
Learning to Edit: Aligning LLMs with Knowledge Editing (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Chuhan Wu, Wanjun Zhong, Xingshan Zeng, Jiahui Gao, Liangyou Li, Xin Jiang, Lifeng Shang, Ruiming Tang, Qun Liu, Wei Wang
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing techniques rely on memorizing updated knowledge, impeding LLMs from effectively combining the new knowledge with their inherent knowledge when answering questions. |
| Approach: | They propose a Learning to Edit framework that equips LLMs with the ability to apply updated knowledge to input questions through a two-phase process . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods in knowledge editing tasks and compares it with four benchmarks and two LLM architectures. |
MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questions (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for retraining from scratch are limited and only work on the recall of edited facts. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark method that allows users to ask multi-hop questions to assess whether edited models correctly answer questions where the answer should change as an entailed consequence of edited facts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing models and scales well with LLMs (up to 175B) it is based on a memory-based approach that stores all edited facts externally while prompting the language model iteratively to generate answers consistent with the edited facts. |
CaPEdit: Capability-Preserving Lifelong Knowledge Editing For Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to incrementally correct factual inaccuracies in large language models (LLMs) but sequential edits can lead to substantial degradation of capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that preserves model capabilities under LKE by decoupling fast-updating factual knowledge from slow-evolving procedural knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves capability preservation across all fundamental capabilities by 49.78% and achieves superior editing performance. |
Can We Edit LLMs for Long-Tail Biomedical Knowledge? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods can enhance LLMs' performance on long-tail biomedical knowledge, but their performance on high-frequency popular knowledge remains inferior to that on high frequency popular knowledge. |
| Approach: | They conduct the first comprehensive study to investigate the effectiveness of knowledge editing methods for editing long-tail biomedical knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve LLMs' performance on long-tail biomedical knowledge, but their performance on high-frequency popular knowledge remains inferior even after editing. |
AdaEdit: Advancing Continuous Knowledge Editing For Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods that can efficiently update knowledge in LLMs are limited due to budget constraints. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that can enhance the performance of edited LLMs in large-size continuous editing regimes. |
| Outcome: | Extensive empirical evaluations on multiple LLMs show that the proposed method outperforms existing methods without compromising the general abilities of these models. |
MindBridge: Scalable and Cross-Model Knowledge Editing via Memory-Augmented Modality (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods overfit to specific models, causing edited knowledge to be discarded during each LLM update and requiring frequent re-editing. |
| Approach: | They propose a solution that allows editors to edit knowledge in multiple LLMs at the same time. |
| Outcome: | The proposed solution performs better even in editing tens of thousands of knowledge entries and can adapt to different LLMs. |
The Model Agreed, But Didn’t Learn: Diagnosing Surface Compliance in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models internalize vast world knowledge as parametric memory, yet inherit the staleness and errors of their source corpora. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that subjects models to discriminative self-assessment under diverse contextual pressures to scrutinize subtle behavioral nuances induced by memory modifications. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves high benchmarks without overwriting internal beliefs, while recursive modifications accumulate representational residues, triggering cognitive instability and permanently diminishing the reversibility of the model’s memory state. |