| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods can enhance LLMs' performance on long-tail biomedical knowledge, but their performance on high-frequency popular knowledge remains inferior to that on high frequency popular knowledge. |
| Approach: | They conduct the first comprehensive study to investigate the effectiveness of knowledge editing methods for editing long-tail biomedical knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve LLMs' performance on long-tail biomedical knowledge, but their performance on high-frequency popular knowledge remains inferior even after editing. |
Similar Papers
Editing the Mind of Giants: An In-Depth Exploration of Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge editing is a promising technique for updating factual knowledge in large language models (LLMs) but studies have identified side effects such as knowledge distortion and the deterioration of general abilities that have emerged after editing. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate the side effects of knowledge editing in large language models using metrics and benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The results of the study highlight the limitations of current knowledge editing methods and outline potential research directions. |
Editing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunities (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yunzhi Yao, Peng Wang, Bozhong Tian, Siyuan Cheng, Zhoubo Li, Shumin Deng, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang
| Challenge: | Recent advances in model editing for LLMs have created challenges and opportunities for the community. |
| Approach: | They propose to alter the behavior of LLMs efficiently within a specific domain without negatively impacting performance across other inputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method alters behavior of LLMs efficiently within a specific domain without negatively impacting performance across other inputs. |
Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models (2024.lrec-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are not immune to issues of factual accuracy or logically consistent. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will present cutting-edge methods and practical tools for editing Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Outcome: | The aim of this course is to familiarize researchers with the latest advancements and emerging strategies in the realm of knowledge editing for LLMs. |
Learning to Edit: Aligning LLMs with Knowledge Editing (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Chuhan Wu, Wanjun Zhong, Xingshan Zeng, Jiahui Gao, Liangyou Li, Xin Jiang, Lifeng Shang, Ruiming Tang, Qun Liu, Wei Wang
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing techniques rely on memorizing updated knowledge, impeding LLMs from effectively combining the new knowledge with their inherent knowledge when answering questions. |
| Approach: | They propose a Learning to Edit framework that equips LLMs with the ability to apply updated knowledge to input questions through a two-phase process . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods in knowledge editing tasks and compares it with four benchmarks and two LLM architectures. |
Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs? (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large language models lack knowledge of nuanced, domain-specific details and are susceptible to hallucinations. |
| Approach: | They construct a benchmark that measures head, torso, and tail facts in terms of popularity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on 18K question-answer pairs regarding head, torso, and tail facts in terms of popularity. |
Editing Conceptual Knowledge for Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Xiaohan Wang, Shengyu Mao, Shumin Deng, Yunzhi Yao, Yue Shen, Lei Liang, Jinjie Gu, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods can modify concept-level definitions, but they can distort instantial knowledge in LLMs, leading to poor performance. |
| Approach: | They construct a benchmark dataset ConceptEdit and establish new metrics for evaluation to investigate the editing capability of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods can modify concept definitions but can distort instantial knowledge in LLMs, leading to poor performance. |
Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge editing is a promising technique to adapt large language models to new knowledge without retraining from scratch. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multilingual dataset to translate a large-scale cross-lingual synthetic dataset from English to Chinese and then to evaluate their performance in Chinese. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can change model performance on several special cases without retraining from scratch. |
Can Factual Opinions Be Edited (Manipulated) in Large Language Models? (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for factual opinion editing focus on atomic facts, ignoring the risks associated with factual opinions. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that achieves opinion–evidence alignment without relying on explicit instructions to edit factual opinions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves opinion–evidence alignment without relying on explicit instructions. |
RuleEdit: Towards Rule-Level Knowledge Generalization to Mitigate Over-Editing in Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods focus on instance-level editing, which is prone to knowledge degradation and general ability deterioration due to redundant instance-specific modifications. |
| Approach: | They propose a rule-level editing method that generalizes rule-derived knowledge to update rule-based instances. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves portability and performance over baselines for LLaMA-2-7B on RULEmix. |
Beyond Memorization: A Rigorous Evaluation Framework for Medical Knowledge Editing (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods show promising results on general-domain benchmarks, but their effectiveness in the medical domain remains largely unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate medical knowledge editing using model-generated rationales as editing targets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves editing efficacy and generalization in medical models without full retraining. |