Dr. Assistant: Enhancing Clinical Diagnostic Inquiry via Structured Diagnostic Reasoning Data and Reinforcement Learning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yue Guo, Fanfu Wang, Jianwei Lv, Xincheng Shi, Yuchen Li, Youya Wang, Yunsheng Zeng, Yujing Liu, Yunhao Qiao, Gen Li, Junfeng Wang, Bo Yuan
| Challenge: | Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) provide reasoning and inquiry guidance for physicians, yet they face high maintenance costs and low generalization capability. |
| Approach: | They propose a clinical diagnostic model with clinical reasoning and inquiry skills, the Dr. Assistant, and a pipeline to capture abstract reasoning logic. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models and achieves competitive performance to closed-source model. |
Similar Papers
DDxTutor: Clinical Reasoning Tutoring System with Differential Diagnosis-Based Structured Reasoning (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled various medical educational applications, but they often provide direct answers that could reduce students’ cognitive engagement and lead to fragmented learning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that follows differential diagnosis principles to decompose clinical reasoning into teachable components. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework decomposes clinical reasoning into teachable components and generates structured teaching references and conducts diagnostic tutoring dialogues. |
Enhancing Study-Level Inference from Clinical Trial Papers via Reinforcement Learning-Based Numeric Reasoning (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior work has framed this task as a textual inference task by retrieving relevant content fragments and inferring conclusions from them. |
| Approach: | They propose to extract structured numerical evidence and apply domain knowledge informed logic to derive outcome-specific conclusions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms general-purpose LLMs of over 400B parameters and achieves a 21% improvement in F1 score over retrieval-based systems. |
MedCoach: Enhancing Medical Reasoning in LLMs via Knowledge Graph-Augmented Chain-of-Thought Distillation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for training specialized reasoning models for the medical domain are limited due to the scarcity of high-quality, large-scale Chain-of-Thought (CoT) data. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that introduces a dedicated coach role to guide the student model through question decomposition. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework smooths the learning curve in medical reasoning by facilitating domain adaptation before advancing to complex long-chain reasoning. |
Eliciting Medical Reasoning with Knowledge-enhanced Data Synthesis: A Semi-Supervised Reinforcement Learning Approach (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to enhance medical reasoning lack high-quality data. |
| Approach: | They propose a medical knowledge-enhanced data Synthesis and Semi-supervised Reinforcement learning framework that uses rare disease knowledge to synthesize distribution-controllable reasoning questions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods across ten medical benchmarks and achieves up to 5.93% gain on rare diseases tasks. |
Scaling is Not All You Need: Clinical-Oriented Reinforcement Learning Makes Parameter-Efficient Clinical Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models are increasingly used in medicine, but expert-level clinical reasoning remains a high-complexity, high-stakes frontier. |
| Approach: | They propose to train clinical reasoning models using a Reasoning-Oriented Data Strategy based on topological synthesis and CoT cold-start. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline outperforms existing models and outperformed the strongest open-source alternatives up to 671B in MedXpertQA. |
DiagnosisArena: Benchmarking Diagnostic Reasoning for Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yakun Zhu, Zhongzhen Huang, Linjie Mu, Yutong Huang, Wei Nie, Jiaji Liu, Shaoting Zhang, Pengfei Liu, Xiaofan Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing medical benchmarks for diagnostic reasoning are limited in their ability to perform complex tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to benchmark diagnostic capabilities of large language models to assess their accuracy and generalization bottlenecks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 45.82%, 31.09%, and 17.79% accuracy, compared to current models, o3-mini, e1 and DeepSeek-R1 . |
From Answers to Arguments: Toward Trustworthy Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning with Toulmin-Guided Curriculum Goal-Conditioned Learning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are obstructed by their opaque and often unreliable reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for trustworthy clinical argumentation by adapting the Toulmin model to the diagnostic process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves diagnostic accuracy comparable to resource-intensive RL methods while offering a more stable and efficient training pipeline. |
Integrating Physician Diagnostic Logic into Large Language Models: Preference Learning from Process Feedback (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have shown that large language models can enhance response richness and coherence, but there is a pressing need to bolster the model’s capacity for diagnostic logic to ensure patient safety. |
| Approach: | They propose an approach termed preference learning from process feedback (PLPF) that integrates the doctor’s diagnostic logic into LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves the diagnostic accuracy of the baseline model in medical conversations by 17.6%, surpassing the performance of traditional approaches. |
Reasoning Like a Doctor: Improving Medical Dialogue Systems via Diagnostic Reasoning Process Alignment (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Medical dialogue systems have attracted significant attention for their potential to act as medical assistants. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that emulates clinicians' diagnostic reasoning processes and aligns with clinician preferences through thought process modeling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework generates appropriate responses that relies on abductive and deductive diagnostic reasoning analyses and aligns with clinician preferences through thought process modeling. |
Med-PRM: Medical Reasoning Models with Stepwise, Guideline-verified Process Rewards (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jaehoon Yun, Jiwoong Sohn, Jungwoo Park, Hyunjae Kim, Xiangru Tang, Daniel Shao, Yong Hoe Koo, Ko Minhyeok, Qingyu Chen, Mark Gerstein, Michael Moor, Jaewoo Kang
| Challenge: | Large language models have shown promise in clinical decision making, but current approaches struggle to localize and correct reasoning errors at specific steps of the reasoning process. |
| Approach: | They propose a process reward modeling framework that leverages retrieval-augmented generation to verify each reasoning step against established medical knowledge bases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on five medical QA benchmarks and two open-ended diagnostic tasks by 13.50% on MedQA. |