Med-PRM: Medical Reasoning Models with Stepwise, Guideline-verified Process Rewards (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jaehoon Yun, Jiwoong Sohn, Jungwoo Park, Hyunjae Kim, Xiangru Tang, Daniel Shao, Yong Hoe Koo, Ko Minhyeok, Qingyu Chen, Mark Gerstein, Michael Moor, Jaewoo Kang
| Challenge: | Large language models have shown promise in clinical decision making, but current approaches struggle to localize and correct reasoning errors at specific steps of the reasoning process. |
| Approach: | They propose a process reward modeling framework that leverages retrieval-augmented generation to verify each reasoning step against established medical knowledge bases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on five medical QA benchmarks and two open-ended diagnostic tasks by 13.50% on MedQA. |
Similar Papers
Process-Supervised Reward Models for Verifying Clinical Note Generation: A Scalable Approach Guided by Domain Expertise (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Hanyin Wang, Chufan Gao, Qiping Xu, Bolun Liu, Guleid Hussein, Hariprasad Reddy Korsapati, Mohamad El Labban, Kingsley Iheasirim, Mohamed Hassan, Gokhan Anil, Brian Bartlett, Jimeng Sun
| Challenge: | Currently, no automated, scalable method exists to evaluate the quality of LLM-generated clinical notes, leaving manual evaluation the gold standard. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for training PRMs to deliver step-level reward signals for LLM-generated clinical notes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms reasoning and non-reasoning models on key evaluations and selects physician-preferred clinical notes with 56.2% accuracy. |
Retrieval-Augmented Process Reward Model for Generalizable Mathematical Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have advanced mathematical reasoning, but they still struggle with out-of-distribution (OOD) issues. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate the logical validity of reasoning steps . they retrieves semantically similar questions and steps for PRM as a warmup . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baseline models on multiple real-world datasets. |
R-PRM: Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Process Reward Models (PRMs) output evaluation scores directly, limiting both learning efficiency and evaluation accuracy. |
| Approach: | They propose a Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling (R-PRM) which activates inherent reasoning to enhance process-level evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models on ProcessBench and PRMBench by 13.9 and 8.5 F1 scores. |
PhysPRM: A Generative Process Reward Model with Fine-grained Diagnosis for Physics Problem Solving (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with physics problem solving due to difficulties in decoding implicit constraints and maintaining physical consistency. |
| Approach: | They propose a Generative PRM that treats evaluation as a generative task . it produces fine-grained diagnoses comprising critiques, final judgments, and specific error types . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves performance across seven benchmarks in Best-of-N and critique refinement strategies. |
A Comprehensive Survey of Process Reward Models: Data Generation, Model Construction, and Usage (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Congmin Zheng, Jiachen Zhu, Zhuoying Ou, Yuxiang Chen, Kangning Zhang, Rong Shan, Zeyu Zheng, Mengyue Yang, Jianghao Lin, Yong Yu, Weinan Zhang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced reasoning ability, yet conventional alignment remains dominated by outcome reward models that judge only final answers. |
| Approach: | They summarize applications across math, code, text, multimodal reasoning, robotics, and agents . goal is to clarify design spaces, reveal open challenges, and guide future research toward fine-grained, robust reasoning alignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model enables finer credit assignment, richer diagnostics, and improved robustness. |
Process Reward Models Meet Planning: Generating Precise and Scalable Datasets for Step-Level Rewards (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing PRM datasets are expensive to construct and limited to the mathematical domain. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to generate a corpus of one million reasoning steps using the Planning Domain Definition Language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generates a corpus of approximately one million reasoning steps across various PDDL domains and trains them. |
Reasoning or Knowledge: Stratified Evaluation of Biomedical LLMs (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Medical reasoning in large language models is a complex cognitive process through which clinicians interpret patient data and make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. |
| Approach: | They propose an evaluation framework that disentangles knowledge recall from reasoning by training a PubMedBERT-based classifier and applying it to 11 widely used biomedical QA benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework disentangles knowledge recall from reasoning by training a PubMedBERT-based classifier and applying it to 11 widely used biomedical QA benchmarks. |
ReasonMed: A 370K Multi-Agent Generated Dataset for Advancing Medical Reasoning (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yu Sun, Xingyu Qian, Weiwen Xu, Hao Zhang, Chenghao Xiao, Long Li, Deli Zhao, Wenbing Huang, Tingyang Xu, Qifeng Bai, Yu Rong
| Challenge: | Existing medical reasoning datasets are limited in scale and typically rely on incomplete data. |
| Approach: | They propose to use ReasonMed to train medical reasoning models using a multi-agent generation, verification, and refinement pipeline. |
| Outcome: | The largest medical reasoning dataset to date surpasses the prior best sub-10B models by 4.17% and even exceeds LLaMA3.1-70B on PubMedQA by 4.60%. |
CodePRM: Execution Feedback-enhanced Process Reward Model for Code Generation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in code generation focus on optimizing the thought process, but lack effective process supervision, making it difficult to optimize the thoughts. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that leverages the code execution feedback to build a code PRM by collecting a large dataset of thought traces and then training it to take both the reasoning process and code execution as input. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms baselines and strong LLMs in the inference stage. |
PRMBench: A Fine-grained and Challenging Benchmark for Process-Level Reward Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant performance in complex reasoning tasks such as mathematics and code generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a process-level benchmark specifically designed to assess the fine-grained error detection capabilities of PRMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model measures the accuracy, soundness, and sensitivity of 25 models across open-source and closed-source large language models. |