Investigating Human and LLMs’ Decisions in Unverifiable Environments: A Case Study with GitHub Activity Overview (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | examining the behaviors of Large Language Models as artificial social actors is underexplored, especially in unverifiable scenarios where conventional benchmarking has little to help improve their abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to collect, compare, and reason about human and LLMs' decisions in an unverifiable scenario and use it to examine their behaviors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method compared human and LLM decisions in an unverifiable scenario on GitHub and found that proprietary LLMs behave more like humans than open-source LLM systems. |
Similar Papers
Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current research suggests that LLM-based agents become increasingly human-like in their performance, sparking interest in using these AI agents as substitutes for human participants in behavioral studies. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LLMs to simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes. |
Do LLMs Align Human Values Regarding Social Biases? Judging and Explaining Social Biases with LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models can lead to undesired consequences when misaligned with human values . previous studies have shown misalignment of LLMs with human value using expert-designed or agent-based emulated bias scenarios . |
| Approach: | They investigate whether large language models (LLMs) are misaligned with human values . they find no significant differences in understanding of HVSB between LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The results show that large language models do not have lower misalignment rates and attack success rates . the study also shows that smaller language models have the ability to explain HVSB . |
Human Alignment: How Much Do We Adapt to LLMs? (2025.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming a common part of our lives, yet few studies have examined how they influence our behavior. |
| Approach: | They propose a cooperative language game in which players aim to converge on a word and play a game in a group. |
| Outcome: | The proposed game shows that humans notice and adapt to differences regardless of whether they are aware they are interacting with an LLM. |
Will LLMs Sink or Swim? Exploring Decision-Making Under Pressure (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown their ability to simulate human-like decision-making, yet the impact of psychological pressures on their decision- making processes remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They used explicit and implicit pressure prompts to induce specific pressures and tested them on reasoning, psychometric, and game theory tasks. |
| Outcome: | The results show that pressures significantly affect LLMs’ decision-making, varying across tasks and models. |
Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? The Misleading Success of Simulating Social Interactions With LLMs (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have enabled richer social simulations . however, the role of information asymmetry in these simulations has been overlooked . |
| Approach: | They develop an evaluation framework to simulate social interactions with LLMs in different settings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework performs better in unrealistic, omniscient simulation settings but struggles in those with information asymmetry. |
Social Intelligence in the Age of LLMs (2025.naacl-tutorial)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are a powerful tool for integrating human-like communication and context-aware interactions into artificial systems. |
| Approach: | They propose to introduce and overview different aspects of artificial social intelligence and their relationship with LLMs by introducing scientific methods for evaluating social intelligence in LLM. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial will introduce scientific methods for evaluating social intelligence in LLMs, highlighting the key challenges, and identifying promising research directions. |
Exploring the Choice Behavior of Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted across various domains where they help to make choices. |
| Approach: | They construct a virtual QA platform that includes three different experimental conditions, with four models from GPT and Llama series participating in repeated experiments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model includes three experimental conditions and four models from GPT and Llama series. |
The LLM Effect: Are Humans Truly Using LLMs, or Are They Being Influenced By Them Instead? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models have shown capabilities close to human performance in various analytical tasks. |
| Approach: | They investigate the efficiency and accuracy of Large Language Models in specialized tasks . they integrate LLMs with expert annotators to observe the impact of LLM suggestions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves task completion speed but introduces anchoring bias . the proposed model is not suitable for open-ended analysis, but is capable of handling specialized tasks. |
Implicit Values Embedded in How Humans and LLMs Complete Subjective Everyday Tasks (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) can underpin AI assistants that help users with everyday tasks, such as making recommendations or performing basic computation. |
| Approach: | They audit how six popular large language models (LLMs) complete 30 everyday tasks and compare them to 100 human crowdworkers from the US. |
| Outcome: | The LLMs perform 30 tasks and are compared to 100 human crowdworkers in the US. |
Real or Robotic? Assessing Whether LLMs Accurately Simulate Qualities of Human Responses in Human-LLM Dialogue (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jonathan Ivey, Shivani Kumar, Jiayu Liu, Hua Shen, Sushrita Rakshit, Rohan Raju, Haotian Zhang, Aparna Ananthasubramaniam, Junghwan Kim, Bowen Yi, Dustin Wright, Abraham Israeli, Anders Giovanni Møller, Lechen Zhang, David Jurgens
| Challenge: | Recent work has sought to use large language models to simulate human-human and human-LLM interactions. |
| Approach: | They use a large-scale dataset to generate a paired LLM-LLM and human-LLm dialogues from the WildChat dataset and quantify how well they align with their human counterparts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform similarly in simulating English, Chinese, and Russian dialogues. |