Papers by Weidong Wu
Gaussian Process based Deep Dyna-Q approach for Dialogue Policy Learning (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning (RL) is the main dialogue policy learning method in recent years. |
| Approach: | They propose a Gaussian Process based Deep Dyna-Q approach to dialogue policy learning . they propose evaluating the quality of experiences generated by the world model using a discriminator . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves the effectiveness and efficiency of dialogue policy learning by 20% with fewer human-machine interactions. |
KnowDR-REC: Auditing Knowledge-Conditioned Visual Grounding in Referring Expression Comprehension (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics suggest that Multimodal large language models have acquired fine-grained visual grounding capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess Referring Expression Comprehension (REC) that uses intra-image visual cues to localize target objects and a controllable evaluation mechanism to test sensitivity to fine-grained factual changes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that multimodal large language models have a high level of performance on the RefCOCO family of benchmarks. |
CHESS: Optimizing LLM Inference via Channel-Wise Thresholding and Selective Sparsification (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for activation sparsification do not capture the relationship between activation and model performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a general activation sparsification approach using channel-wise thresholding and selective sparsifying to capture the relationship between activation and model performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach reduces the number of activated neurons during inference by 1.27x over eight downstream tasks while activating fewer parameters than existing methods. |
TiKMiX: Efficient Semi-Dynamic Data Mixture via Data Influence for LLM Pre-training (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yifan Wang, null Binbinliu, Fengze Liu, Yuanfan Guo, Jiyao Deng, Xuecheng Wu, Weidong Zhou, Xiaohuan Zhou, Taifeng Wang
| Challenge: | Static data mixing strategies in large language models are often suboptimal as they fail to adapt to the model’s evolving learning states. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-dynamic data mixing framework that uses a key observation of influence ranking invariance to reduce computational overhead by 80% . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces computational overhead by 80% and achieves an average performance gain of 2% across nine downstream benchmarks, effectively mitigating data under-digestion. |
MRT: Multi-modal Short- and Long-range Temporal Convolutional Network for Time-sync Comment Video Behavior Prediction (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using time-sync comments, it is difficult to understand user behavior due to complexity of interactions between users, videos, and comments. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel time-sync comment behavior prediction model that takes historical behavior into account and optimizes it on the basis of user preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the performance of time-sync comments on visual frames and textual comments on two cats playing simultaneously. |
Exploring the Choice Behavior of Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted across various domains where they help to make choices. |
| Approach: | They construct a virtual QA platform that includes three different experimental conditions, with four models from GPT and Llama series participating in repeated experiments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model includes three experimental conditions and four models from GPT and Llama series. |
The Lawyer That Never Thinks: Consistency and Fairness as Keys to Reliable AI (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in high-stakes domains like law and research. |
| Approach: | They evaluate six leading Large Language Models on rationality, stability, and ethical fairness through reasoning tests, legal challenges, and bias-sensitive scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The models perform well on reasoning tests, legal challenges, and bias-sensitive scenarios. |