Do LLMs Align Human Values Regarding Social Biases? Judging and Explaining Social Biases with LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models can lead to undesired consequences when misaligned with human values . previous studies have shown misalignment of LLMs with human value using expert-designed or agent-based emulated bias scenarios . |
| Approach: | They investigate whether large language models (LLMs) are misaligned with human values . they find no significant differences in understanding of HVSB between LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The results show that large language models do not have lower misalignment rates and attack success rates . the study also shows that smaller language models have the ability to explain HVSB . |
Similar Papers
How Inclusively do LMs Perceive Social and Moral Norms? (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Language models (LMs) are used in decision-making systems and as interactive assistants. |
| Approach: | They propose to prompt 11 LMs on rules-of-thumb and compare their outputs with 100 human annotators. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is compared with 100 human annotators to find out if they are inclusive of diverse human values. |
To Mask or to Mirror: Human-AI Alignment in Collective Reasoning (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to model and augment collective decision-making. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for assessing collective alignment using the Lost at Sea social psychology task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework compares LLMs with human-AI alignment on the Lost at Sea social psychology task. |
Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current research suggests that LLM-based agents become increasingly human-like in their performance, sparking interest in using these AI agents as substitutes for human participants in behavioral studies. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LLMs to simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes. |
Whose Emotions and Moral Sentiments do Language Models Reflect? (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research has focused on positional alignment, which measures how closely the models mimic the opinions and stances of different social groups. |
| Approach: | They define the problem of affective alignment, which measures how LMs’ emotional and moral tone represents those of different groups. |
| Outcome: | The results show that the models represent the perspectives of some social groups better than others, suggesting a systemic bias within LMs. |
Aligning Language Models to User Opinions (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Personality is a defining feature of human beings, shaped by a complex interplay of demographic characteristics, moral principles, and social experiences. |
| Approach: | They use public opinion surveys to model past user opinions in addition to user demographics and ideology to achieve up to 7 points accuracy gains in predicting public opinions from survey questions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 7 points accuracy gains in predicting public opinions from public opinion surveys across a broad set of topics. |
7 Points to Tsinghua but 10 Points to ? Assessing Large Language Models in Agentic Multilingual National Bias (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models have garnered significant attention for their capabilities in multilingual natural language processing, but studies on risks associated with cross biases are limited to immediate context preferences. |
| Approach: | They investigate multilingual bias in state-of-the-art Large Language Models by analyzing their responses to decision-making tasks across multiple languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can provide personalized advice across university applications, travel, and relocation scenarios. |
Ask LLMs Directly, “What shapes your bias?”: Measuring Social Bias in Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to evaluate social bias in large language models have limitations . et al., 1995: stereotypes shape social perceptions without objective basis . |
| Approach: | They propose a method to intuitively quantify social perceptions and suggest metrics to evaluate biases within LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics capture the multi-dimensional aspects of social bias, the paper shows . they show that the proposed metrics can be used to evaluate bias in large language models . |
Robustness and Confounders in the Demographic Alignment of LLMs with Human Perceptions of Offensiveness (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | despite evidence of demographic bias, reports with whom they align best are hard to generalize or contradictory . confounders introduced in the annotation process account for more variation in alignment patterns than demographic traits . |
| Approach: | They examine the alignment of large language models with human annotations in offensive language datasets. |
| Outcome: | The results show that LLMs align better with human annotations than other models. |
Unintended Harms of Value-Aligned LLMs: Psychological and Empirical Insights (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Value-aligned LLMs are more prone to harmful behavior than fine-tuned models . value-aligned models generate text according to the aligned values, which can amplify harmful outcomes. |
| Approach: | They propose to use in-context alignment methods to enhance the safety of value-aligned LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve value alignment and safety, the authors say . value-aligned models are more prone to harmful behavior than fine-tuned models . |
Your Mileage May Vary: How Empathy and Demographics Shape Human Preferences in LLM Responses (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | large language models (LLMs) increasingly assist subjective decision-making . prior work uses aggregate human judgments, but demographic variation and its linguistic drivers remain underexplored. |
| Approach: | They analyze how demographic background and empathy level correlate with LLM-generated dilemma responses . they also identify markers that predict group-level differences . |
| Outcome: | The authors show that demographic background and empathy level correlate with LLM preferences . their findings highlight the need for demographically informed LLM evaluations. |