Will LLMs Sink or Swim? Exploring Decision-Making Under Pressure (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown their ability to simulate human-like decision-making, yet the impact of psychological pressures on their decision- making processes remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They used explicit and implicit pressure prompts to induce specific pressures and tested them on reasoning, psychometric, and game theory tasks. |
| Outcome: | The results show that pressures significantly affect LLMs’ decision-making, varying across tasks and models. |
Similar Papers
Exploring the Sensitivity of LLMs’ Decision-Making Capabilities: Insights from Prompt Variations and Hyperparameters (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior studies have compared the decision-making abilities of large language models with those of humans from a psychological perspective. |
| Approach: | They examine LLMs' performance on the Horizon decision-making task studied by Binz and Schulz (2023) they observe that the decision- making abilities fluctuate based on input prompts and temperature settings. |
| Outcome: | The results show that LLMs display a human-like exploration–exploitation tradeoff after simple adjustments to the prompt. |
Investigating Human and LLMs’ Decisions in Unverifiable Environments: A Case Study with GitHub Activity Overview (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | examining the behaviors of Large Language Models as artificial social actors is underexplored, especially in unverifiable scenarios where conventional benchmarking has little to help improve their abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to collect, compare, and reason about human and LLMs' decisions in an unverifiable scenario and use it to examine their behaviors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method compared human and LLM decisions in an unverifiable scenario on GitHub and found that proprietary LLMs behave more like humans than open-source LLM systems. |
Exploring the Choice Behavior of Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted across various domains where they help to make choices. |
| Approach: | They construct a virtual QA platform that includes three different experimental conditions, with four models from GPT and Llama series participating in repeated experiments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model includes three experimental conditions and four models from GPT and Llama series. |
How Does Cognitive Bias Affect Large Language Models? A Case Study on the Anchoring Effect in Price Negotiation Simulations (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Cognitive biases can be observed in LLMs, affecting their reliability in real-world applications. |
| Approach: | They investigate the anchoring effect in LLM-driven price negotiations . reasoning models are less prone to the anchor effect, they find . |
| Outcome: | The proposed study shows that LLMs are influenced by the anchoring effect like humans . reasoning models are less prone to the anchor effect, but personality traits are not affected . |
Biased LLMs can Influence Political Decision-Making (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jillian Fisher, Shangbin Feng, Robert Aron, Thomas Richardson, Yejin Choi, Daniel W Fisher, Jennifer Pan, Yulia Tsvetkov, Katharina Reinecke
| Challenge: | Recent studies have found that biased LLMs can influence decisions in areas such as medical classifications and educational hiring. |
| Approach: | They conducted two interactive experiments on partisan bias in large language models while completing tasks with either a biased liberal, biased conservative, or unbiased control model. |
| Outcome: | The results show that prior knowledge of AI is weakly correlated with a reduction of the bias, suggesting that AI education can be crucial for mitigating bias effects. |
The LLM Effect: Are Humans Truly Using LLMs, or Are They Being Influenced By Them Instead? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models have shown capabilities close to human performance in various analytical tasks. |
| Approach: | They investigate the efficiency and accuracy of Large Language Models in specialized tasks . they integrate LLMs with expert annotators to observe the impact of LLM suggestions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves task completion speed but introduces anchoring bias . the proposed model is not suitable for open-ended analysis, but is capable of handling specialized tasks. |
Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current research suggests that LLM-based agents become increasingly human-like in their performance, sparking interest in using these AI agents as substitutes for human participants in behavioral studies. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LLMs to simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes. |
Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMs (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models inherit societal biases against protected groups and can be subject to functionally resembling cognitive bias. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to uncover, evaluate, and mitigate cognitive bias in large language models by using a dataset containing 13,465 prompts to evaluate LLM decisions on different cognitive biases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework uncovers, evaluates, and mitigates cognitive bias in large language models, particularly in high-stakes decision-making tasks. |
Your Mileage May Vary: How Empathy and Demographics Shape Human Preferences in LLM Responses (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | large language models (LLMs) increasingly assist subjective decision-making . prior work uses aggregate human judgments, but demographic variation and its linguistic drivers remain underexplored. |
| Approach: | They analyze how demographic background and empathy level correlate with LLM-generated dilemma responses . they also identify markers that predict group-level differences . |
| Outcome: | The authors show that demographic background and empathy level correlate with LLM preferences . their findings highlight the need for demographically informed LLM evaluations. |
Do LLMs Play Dice? Exploring Probability Distribution Sampling in Large Language Models for Behavioral Simulation (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | LLMs are used to emulate sequential decision-making processes of humans . however, their ability to perform probabilistic sampling is limited . |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models (LLMs) as agents to emulate the sequential decision-making processes of humans represented as Markov decision-makers (MDPs). |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can understand probabilities, but struggle with sampling precision . integrating coding tools can improve sampling precision, but this level of sampling precision still makes it difficult to simulate human behavior as agents. |