| Challenge: | Existing Large Multi-modal Models lack a robust visual processing capability that is often masked by evaluation metrics that prioritize final-answer accuracy. |
| Approach: | They propose a three-layer evaluation framework that scrutinizes the generation of valid visual aids and the soundness of subsequent reasoning steps. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework examines the generation of valid visual aids and the soundness of subsequent reasoning steps on state-of-the-art models. |
Similar Papers
Selective Vision is the Challenge for Visual Reasoning: A Benchmark for Visual Argument Understanding (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Visual arguments rely on images to persuade viewers to do or believe something . |
| Approach: | They propose three tasks for evaluating visual argument understanding . they use visual premises, commonsense premises and reasoning trees to analyze visual arguments . |
| Outcome: | The proposed tasks evaluate visual argument understanding using a dataset of 1,611 images annotated with 5,112 visual premises (with regions), 5,574 commonsense premises, and reasoning trees connecting them into structured arguments. |
LlamaV-o1: Rethinking Step-by-step Visual Reasoning in LLMs (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Omkar Thawakar, Dinura Dissanayake, Ketan Pravin More, Ritesh Thawkar, Ahmed Heakl, Noor Ahsan, Yuhao Li, Ilmuz Zaman Mohammed Zumri, Jean Lahoud, Rao Muhammad Anwer, Hisham Cholakkal, Ivan Laptev, Mubarak Shah, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Salman Khan
| Challenge: | Existing approaches do not emphasize step-wise problem-solving. |
| Approach: | They propose a visual reasoning chain benchmark and a fine-grained reasoning metric that evaluates correctness and logical coherence at each step. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing models in six benchmarks and is 5x faster during inference scaling. |
SpatialMath: Spatial Comprehension-Infused Symbolic Reasoning for Mathematical Problem-Solving (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current models struggle to accurately decompose intricate visual inputs and connect perception with structured reasoning, leading to suboptimal performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a Spatial Comprehension-Infused Symbolic Reasoning Framework to integrate spatial representations into structured symbolic reasoning chains. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing models in vision-intensive mathematical problems. |
We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning? (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong, MinhuiWu MinhuiWu, Chong Sun, Xiaoshuai Song, Jiapeng Wang, Zhuoma GongQue, Shanglin Lei, YiFan Zhang, Zhe Wei, Miaoxuan Zhang, Runfeng Qiao, Xiao Zong, Yida Xu, Peiqing Yang, Zhimin Bao, Muxi Diao, Chen Li, Honggang Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus more on end-to-end performance, but neglect the underlying principles of knowledge acquisition and generalization. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark specifically designed to explore the problem-solving principles by decomposing 6.5K visual math problems into 10.9K step-level questions for evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers 6.5K visual math problems and 10.9K step-level questions spanning 5 layers of knowledge granularity and 67 hierarchical knowledge concepts. |
UTMath: A Benchmark for Math Evaluation with Unit Test (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prevailing benchmarks for mathematical reasoning include MATH and AIME . predicated on single-instantiation problems with fixed numbers, these models leave generalization on isomorphic problem variants untested. |
| Approach: | They propose a mathematical reasoning benchmark that quantifies solution accuracy and solution space generality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model solves 1,053 problems spanning 9 mathematical domains . the best-performing model solved only 32.57% of the problems . |
MathCanvas: Intrinsic Visual Chain-of-Thought for Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Weikang Shi, Aldrich Yu, Rongyao Fang, Houxing Ren, Ke Wang, Aojun Zhou, Changyao Tian, Xinyu Fu, Yuxuan Hu, Zimu Lu, Linjiang Huang, Si Liu, Rui Liu, Hongsheng Li
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to visual chain-of-thought are limited by external tools or fail to generate high-fidelity diagrams. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to enable large multimodal models with VCoT capabilities . they pre-train a model on a 15.2M-pair corpus and teach it how to leverage visual aids . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework unlocks complex, human-like visual reasoning in large language models . it pre-trains the model on a 15.2M-pair corpus and fine-tunes it on MathCanvas-Instruct . |
TurtleBench: A Visual Programming Benchmark in Turtle Geometry (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) are capable of reasoning about geometric patterns, but they are still a challenge to evaluate. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LMMs’ ability to interpret geometric patterns and generate precise code outputs. |
| Outcome: | The benchmark compared LMMs with turtle geometry and GPT-4V, and found that few-shot prompting improved their performance (2%). |
Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks for large reasoning models are saturated by a lack of reliable and verifiable benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They propose a rigorously curated, Olympiad-level math benchmark comprising 350 problems, each with parallel English and Chinese versions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark unifies two evaluation paradigms and offers 150 problems formalized in Lean 4 for rigorous process-level evaluation. |
Your Reasoning Benchmark May Not Test Reasoning: Revealing Perception Bottleneck in Abstract Reasoning Benchmarks (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus and ARC-AGI are widely used to assess progress in artificial intelligence. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage pipeline that separates perception and reasoning . they propose to test this pipeline against standard end-to-end one-stage evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline separates perception and reasoning, and isolates reasoning from bottlenecks. |
MathSight: A Benchmark Exploring Have Vision-Language Models Really Seen in University-Level Mathematical Reasoning? (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks rarely isolate how much visual information contributes to reasoning . a growing collection of benchmarks has catalyzed rapid progress in multimodal reasoning - but how much it contributes remains unclear . |
| Approach: | They propose a university-level multimodal mathematical reasoning benchmark to quantify the effect of visual input. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark disentangles and quantifies the effect of visual input on multimodal reasoning models. |